Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2389-2400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2122

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area

HE Jing-bin1, FENG Zhong-ju1, DONG Yun-xiu1, 2, HU Hai-bo1, LIU Chuang3, GUO Sui-zhu1, ZHANG Cong1, WU Min1, WANG Zhen4   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Longdong University, Qingyang, Gansu 745000, China; 3. Department of Transport of Hainan Province, Haikou, Hainan 570204 China; 4. Shandong Hi-speed Technology Development Group Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shangdong 250001, China
  • Received:2019-12-18 Revised:2020-04-21 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Hainan Provincial Transportation Science and Technology Project (HNZXY2015-045R).

Abstract: In order to study the dynamic response characteristics of pile foundation under the pile-soil-fault coupling effect, four different types of seismic waves with the peak acceleration of 0.35g are selected for shaking table test. The acceleration response, relative displacement of pile top, bending moment of pile body and damage of pile foundation under different types of seismic waves are studied. The test results show that the parameters of the pile on hanging wall are obviously larger than those on the footwall of the fault, showing the hanging wall effect. The peak acceleration of pile top is greater than that of pile bottom, and the upper soil layer has filtering effect on the input seismic wave. The acceleration response of pile top has hysteresis compared with that of pile bottom. The acceleration at the top of the pile and the amplification coefficient α of the peak acceleration are the largest for the El-Centro wave. The α difference between the hanging wall and footwall is the largest for the Kobe wave. The peak values of relative displacement of pile top and bending moment of pile foundation are the largest for the Kobe wave. The bending moment of pile body is larger at the soil interface. When different types of seismic wave are applied, the peak value of bending moment of pile body does not exceed the bending capacity of pile body. It is suggested that the pile foundation of bridge near fault in strong earthquake area can be checked according to different seismic waveforms.

Key words: geotechnical engineering, piles foundation, shaking table test, dynamic response, meizoseismal area, near fault

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473
[1] JIANG Xiao-tong, ZHANG Xi-wen, LÜ Ying-hui, LI Ren-jie, JIANG Hao, . Current applications and future prospects of machine learning in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[3] KE Wen-hai, YANG Wen-hai, LI Yuan, WU Lei, . Dynamic response of pile foundation in slope topography under SH wave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[4] YANG Ming-hui, CAI Ming-hui, CHEN Bo, YANG Han, . A method for calculating horizontal impedance of a single pile considering wave-induced seabed dynamic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[5] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[6] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[7] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[8] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[9] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[10] MA Jian-xun, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, PANG Pan-wang, LI Wen-xiao, YAN Hong-xiang. Effects of basement stories on seismic response of high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[11] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[12] LI Fu-xiu, GUO Wen-hao, ZHENG Ye-wei. Shaking table test of the back-to-back reinforced soil walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[13] HE Zi-lei, JIANG Guan-lu, FENG Hai-zhou, PAN Shen-xin, HE Xiao-long, LI Jie, . Dynamic response characteristics of bedrock and overburden layer slope supported by a combination of pile-sheet wall-anchor cables under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[14] WANG Zhi-de, SI Ying-ying, LI Jie, QIAN Meng-fan, AN Jia-xing, . Dynamic response of jointed granite under low strain rate impact load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[15] ZHU Dan, JIANG Guan-lu, CHEN Hong-yu, ZHAO Xin-hui, HUANG De-gui, LIU Yi-fu, . Shaking table experimental study on the dynamic response characteristics of single and double-row pile-supported road graben slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!