›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 9-27.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.01.002

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

以标贯试验为依据的砂土液化确定性及概率判别法

陈国兴1, 2,孔梦云1, 2,李小军3, 2,常向东4,周国良4   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京210009;2. 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009; 3. 中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081;4. 环境保护部核与辐射安全中心,北京 100082
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-16 出版日期:2015-01-12 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然基金项目(No. 41172258);国家重点基础研究发展计划(No. 2011CB013601);国家科技重大专项(No. 2011ZX06002-010-15, No. 2013ZX06002001-09)。

Deterministic and probabilistic triggering correlations for assessment of seismic soil liquefaction at nuclear power plant

CHEN Guo-xing1, 2,KONG Meng-yun1, 2,LI Xiao-jun3, 2,CHANG Xiang-dong4,ZHOU Guo-liang4   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 3. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China; 4. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection of P. R. China, Beijing 100082, China
  • Received:2013-08-16 Online:2015-01-12 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 核电厂址非基岩场地的地基液化问题是核电厂选址的关键问题,亟需建立核电厂址地基液化判别方法。回顾了以标贯试验和地表峰值加速度为依据的砂土液化判别方法的演化历史,依据Idriss-Boulanger确定液化临界曲线的基本方法,提出了确定液化临界曲线的基本原则,分别依据美国液化数据库、中国抗震规范液化判别式所用的液化数据及综合两者的液化数据资料,给出了相应的液化临界曲线,验证了液化临界曲线的位置对不同的细粒含量、有效上覆压力、现场试验方法的液化数据的合理性,分析了测量或估计土层循环应力比和修正标贯击数各种因素的不确定性对液化临界曲线的敏感性,结果表明:所提的液化临界曲线不易受各种因素的影响。利用Monte Carlo模拟、加权最大似然法和加权经验概率法,给出了液化临界曲线的名义抗液化安全系数与液化概率的经验关系式及概率等值线,并对核电厂Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类抗震物项地基,给出了相应的液化临界曲线。

关键词: 核电厂址非基岩场地, 土体液化判别, 确定性判别法, 概率判别法, 液化临界曲线, 标贯试验, 地表峰值加速度

Abstract: Seismic soil liquefaction problem in the soil site of nuclear power plants is a crucial point for the nuclear power plant siting. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a seismic soil liquefaction assessment procedure suitable for the soil site of nuclear power plants. The standard penetration test (SPT) and peak ground acceleration (PGA) based assessment method of soil liquefaction potential is reviewed. The basic principle to determine liquefaction triggering curve is proposed. Three corresponding liquefaction triggering correlations are derived respectively from the Idriss and Boulanger liquefaction case history database, the database of Chinese Code for Building Seismic Design and the two combined databases to reduce the possibility of mistaking liquefaction data points as no-liquefaction data points. The positions of the derived liquefaction triggering correlations are verified with respect to many factors including fines content, overburden stress and standard penetration test (SPT) procedures. In addition, the sensitivity of the database’s interpretation to a number of aspects and components of the analysis framework is examined. The results show these factors have a slight effect on the position of the proposed liquefaction triggering correlations. At last, the relationship among the nominal factor of safety and the probability of liquefaction as well as the probabilistic contours for the proposed liquefaction triggering correlation is given on the basis of Monte Carlo simulation, the weighted maximum likelihood technique and a weighted empirical probability approach. The soil liquefaction triggering correlations are proposed for the soil sites of seismic design categoryⅠ, Ⅱand Ⅲ of the structure, system and component of nuclear power plants, respectively.

Key words: soil site of nuclear power plants, soil liquefaction assessment, determinative assessment, probability assessment, liquefaction triggering curve, standard penetration test (SPT), peak ground acceleration

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, 孙锐. 液化判别临界曲线的变化模式与一般规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3603-3609.
[2] 陈国兴 ,金丹丹 ,朱 姣 ,李小军 , . 河口盆地非线性地震效应及设计地震动参数[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1721-1736.
[3] 孔梦云 ,陈国兴 ,李小军 ,常向东 ,周国良,. 以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1239-1252.
[4] 廖先斌,郭晓勇,杜 宇. 英标和国标标贯设备试验结果相关性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 143-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[4] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[5] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[6] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[7] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] 王云岗 ,章 光 ,胡 琦. 斜桩基础受力特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .