›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1761-1768.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.06.030

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

磁西矿超深井筒原岩地应力研究

周晓敏   

  1. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-14 出版日期:2015-06-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:周晓敏,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博导,主要从事岩土力学、人工地层冻结、地下工程结构设计

Study of in-situ geostress around an ultra-deep shaft in Cixi colliery

ZHOU Xiao-min   

  1. Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines of Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2014-10-14 Online:2015-06-11 Published:2018-06-14

摘要: 介绍了磁西超千米井筒设计和地质条件,展示了井壁受力的实测方案以及依据包神解析公式进行地层原岩应力反演计算的原理。实测结果反演得到了井筒1 208 m深处的水平应力平均估值以及不均匀分布情况,水平应力与垂直应力之比符合自重应力场的规律,侧压力系数估值约为0.256~0.278之间。通过有限元数值模拟,图形化展示了井筒地应力分布,验证了实测反演数据的合理性,同时也反映了岩层剪切模量和构造等地质条件对水平应力不均匀分布的影响规律。结合对该矿区宏观地质构造运动演化和地质力学的定性分析原理,综合地分析了实测结果、解析反演和数值计算之间的一致性,对水平原岩应力Hoek & Brown统计规律的普适性提出了质疑,讨论了现有原岩应力解析计算方法,为采用包神公式进行井壁设计供了参考。

关键词: 原岩应力, 井壁测试, 地应力反演, 超深井筒

Abstract: This paper reports the design of an auxiliary shaft at a depth of more than 1 000 m at Cixi colliery and its surrounding geological conditions, and addresses the scheme for monitoring the in-situ stress around the shaft and the principle of inverse calculation for the in-situ geostress using the “Baoshen” analytical solution. The average values and nonuniform distribution of horizontal stresses are actually obtained at the depth of 1 208 m through inverse calculation and analysis of field monitoring data, which reveals that the ratio of horizontal stress to vertical stress conforms to the dead weight stress field. The lateral pressure coefficient ranges from 0.256 to 0.278. The in-situ stress distribution around the shaft is illustrated based on finite element simulations; and thus the reliability of inverse data based on field measurements is corroborated. Meanwhile, it is shown that the nonuniform distribution of horizontal stress is related to some factors such as the shear modulus of rock and geological tectonic, etc. With combining the information on tectonic evolution in this area and geomechanical principles, the consistence among the results of in-situ test, analytical solution and numerical simulations is comprehensively analyzed. In this context, the universality of the Hoek & Brown statistic principle about the distribution of horizontal in-situ stress is questioned, and the existing analytical methods for calculating the in-situ horizontal stress are also discussed, laying a foundation for using the “Baoshen” solution to the shaft lining design.

Key words: in-situ stress, shaft lining test, inverse calculation of in-situ stress, super deep shaft

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 颜天佑,崔 臻,张勇慧,张传健,盛 谦,李建贺,. 跨活动断裂隧洞工程赋存区域地应力场分布特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 378-386.
[2] 付玉华,李夕兵,董陇军. 损伤条件下深部岩体巷道光面爆破参数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1420-1426.
[3] 隋 斌,朱维申,张 欣,王 刚. 某水电站地下厂房围岩稳定性分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 416-420.
[4] 余卫平,耿克勤,汪小刚. 某水电站地下厂房洞室群围岩稳定分析[J]. , 2004, 25(12): 1955-1960.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[2] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[3] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[7] 王学武,许尚杰,党发宁,程素珍. 水位骤降时的非饱和坝坡稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2760 -2764 .
[8] 王维铭,孙 锐,曹振中,袁晓铭. 国内外地震液化场地特征对比研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3913 -3918 .
[9] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .