›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 378-386.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2390

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨活动断裂隧洞工程赋存区域地应力场分布特征研究

颜天佑1,崔 臻2,张勇慧2,张传健1,盛 谦2,李建贺1   

  1. 1. 长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司,湖北 武汉 430010; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-30 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 崔臻,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事地下岩石工程稳定性评价研究。E-mail: zcui@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: 36994311@qq.com
  • 作者简介:颜天佑,男,1982年生,高级工程师,主要从事水利水电岩石力学方面研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2015CB057905);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51779253,No. 41672319);湖北省自然科学基金项目(No. 2017CFB725);国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0401803)。

Study of distribution characteristics of in-situ stress field in occurrence area of crossing active fault tunnel engineering

YAN Tian-you1, CUI Zhen2, ZHANG Yong-hui1, ZHANG Chuan-jian1, SHENG Qian2, LI Jian-he1   

  1. 1. Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2017-11-30 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(2015CB057905), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51779253, 41672319), the Hubei Province Natural Science Found Project(2007CFB725) and the National Key R & D Program of China(2016YFC0401803).

摘要: 初始地应力的方向、量值和分布形式是影响岩石地下工程围岩应力、变形和破坏模式的重要因素,在工程区域难以开展大量实测工作,且实测结果具有相当的离散性,引入数值分析方法和数学理论对地应力场综合分析是有效的解决手段之一。结合滇中引水香炉山隧洞穿越龙蟠-乔后断裂段(楚波–白汉场断裂南段)工程,针对实测结果中方向结果离散性较大的问题,基于中国现代构造地应力场特征,对丽江地区复合断裂对区域地应力场影响的理论分析与数值模拟,获取了地应力场方向的定性认识。基于钻孔测试成果,通过基于多元线性回归的三维地应力场反演获取了地应力场方向与量值的定量认识。获得的初步结果表明,龙蟠–乔后断裂F10运动形式以正断错动为主;左旋走滑为辅的滑动,受其影响隧洞工程在穿越F10断裂部位的主应力发生偏转,偏转后最大主应力方向近似平行或小夹角相交于F10断裂走向;反演获得的香炉山隧洞趋近F10-1、F10-2段最大主应力量值范围为13~19 MPa,中间主应力为11~16 MPa,最小主应力为9~13 MPa,应力量值较高,并呈现 > > ( 、 分别为最大、最小水平主应力)的特征;F10断裂F10-1、F10-2主断带成为地应力场的控制性边界,其间应力量值明显小于上下两盘岩体,F10-1、F10-2主断带间岩体最大主应力量值范围在9~10 MPa,最小主应力量值范围在7~10 MPa,地应力最大主应力方向与隧洞纵轴线以约60°夹角相交,相交角度较大,对隧洞稳定性影响较大。

关键词: 地应力, 地应力反演, 构造应力, 多元线性分析

Abstract: The direction, magnitude and distribution of in-situ stress are important factors affecting the deformation and failure modes of underground engineering. It is difficult to carry out a lot of measuring test work in the engineering area; the measured results may be of great discreteness. Therefore, it is one of the effective methods to introduce the numerical analysis method and mathematical theory to analyze the in-situ stress field synthetically. This paper is based on the Xianlushan water dispersion tunnel that planned to across the active Longpan-Qiaohou fault, and aims to solve the problem of large discreteness of directional results in measured results. Qualitative understanding of the direction of in-situ stress field is firstly obtained by theoretical analysis and numerical simulation with the existing understanding of the tectonic stress field in China. Based on the test results, the quantitative understanding of the direction and magnitude of the in-situ stress field is obtained by the inversion of the three-dimensional in-situ stress field based on the multiple linear regression. The preliminary results obtained demonstrate that the movement form of Longpan-Qiaohou fault (F10) is mainly consists of normal sliding in conjunction with minor strike sliding. With its influence, the direction of the maximum principal in-situ stress is approximately parallel or small angle intersecting with the trend of F10. The regressed maximum principal in-situ stress for the rock mass near the tunnel will be 13-19 MPa; and the corresponding intermediate principal stress will be 11-16 MPa; and 9-13 MPa for the minimum principal stress. The stress level is relatively high, and presents a trend that > > ( and are the maximum and minimum horizontal principal stresses respectively). F10-1 and F10-2 become the control boundary of the in-situ field, and the stress level between the F10-1 and F10-2 is obviously smaller than the upper and lower rock mass, i.e. 9-10 MPa for the maximum principal in-situ stress, and 7-10 MPa for the minimum principal stress. The maximum principal stress direction of in-situ stress intersects with the longitudinal axis of tunnel with an angle of about 60 degrees, which has a negative impact on the stability of the tunnel.

Key words: in-situ stress, in-situ stress inversion, tectonic stress, multivariate linear analysis

中图分类号: 

  • U452

[1] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[2] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[3] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[4] 王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[5] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[6] 邓 珂, 陈 明, 卢文波, 严 鹏, 冷振东, . 地应力对坝肩槽预裂爆破成缝的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1121-1128.
[7] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[8] 王庆武,巨能攀,杜玲丽,黄 健,胡 勇,. 拉林铁路桑日至加查段三维地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1450-1462.
[9] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[10] 闫振雄,郭奇峰,王培涛, . 空心包体应变计地应力分量计算方法及应用[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 715-721.
[11] 蒙 伟,何 川,汪 波,张钧博,吴枋胤,夏舞阳. 基于侧压力系数的岩爆区初始地应力场二次反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[12] 钟 山,江 权,冯夏庭,刘继光,李邵军,邱士利,吴世勇,. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[13] 曾癸森,吕爱钟. 考虑构造应力作用下浅埋圆形隧洞的解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 79-86.
[14] 张社荣,胡安奎,王 超,彭振辉, . 基于SLR-ANN的地应力场三维智能反演方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2737-2745.
[15] 王成虎,邢博瑞,. 原生裂隙水压致裂原地应力测量的理论与实践新进展[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1289-1297.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!