岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1818-1828.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0931

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究

侯公羽1, 2,荆浩勇1,梁金平1,谭金鑫1,张永康1,杨希1,谢鑫1   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083;2. 新疆工程学院 矿业工程与地质学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830091
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-23 修回日期:2019-10-31 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-07-31
  • 作者简介:侯公羽,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程、岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51574247)

Experimental study on surrounding rock deformation and acoustic emission characteristics of rectangular roadway under different loads

HOU Gong-yu1, 2, JING Hao-yong1, LIANG Jin-ping1, TAN Jin-xin1, ZHANG Yong-kang1, YANG Xi1, XIE Xin1   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Mining Engineering and Geology, Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830091, China
  • Received:2019-05-23 Revised:2019-10-31 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-07-31
  • Contact: 荆浩勇,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: jinghaoyong@126.com E-mail:hgyht@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51574247).

摘要: 为研究不同初始地应力下矩形巷道在开挖卸荷过程中围岩的变形破坏特征以及声发射(AE)特性,使用水泥砂浆浇筑胚体并加工成矩形巷道围岩试件,进行开挖卸荷模型试验,得到顶板、隅角和帮部围岩的变形破坏特征以及AE撞击计数、损伤变量、频谱的演化特点。试验结果表明:(1)矩形巷道在开挖卸荷过程中以顶板和帮部围岩径向受拉、隅角围岩切向受压变形为主,且顶板围岩变形特征与帮部类似。(2)地应力量级增加,对顶板(巷帮)的径向以及隅角围岩的切向应变速率影响显著,对其他方向影响较小。(3)AE撞击计数和损伤变量的演化特征揭示了围岩试件内部微裂隙萌生、扩展以及宏观裂缝出现直至发生主破裂的损伤过程;地应力越高,主破裂发生的时间会相对推迟,且开挖卸荷后的相对损伤比重随初始地应力增加呈非线性增长。(4)AE信号峰值频率集中区段增多,且幅值逐渐升高的现象可看作围岩即将发生主破裂的前兆信息;地应力越高,峰频集中区段分布越广。(5)随地应力增大,围岩试件内壁展现了从微裂纹―分层碎胀―块状剥落的变化过程;矩形巷道破坏形式主要以顶板和帮部围岩的张拉性隆起为主,并伴随离层碎胀现象,隅角围岩在试件失去承载力时表现为压剪破坏的特征。

关键词: 初始地应力, 矩形巷道, 开挖卸荷, 变形破坏, 声发射

Abstract: To investigate the unloading deformation, failure and acoustic emission characteristics during excavation of rectangular roadway under different initial geostresses, excavation unloading model tests were carried out on casted surrounding-rock specimens made of cement mortar. The deformation and failure characteristics of the roof, corner and surrounding rock as well as the evolution characteristics of AE impact count, damage variable and frequency spectrum were obtained. Experimental results showed that: 1) The failure of rectangular roadway was mainly caused by the radial tension strain of the roof and surrounding rock, and the tangential compression strain of the corner. The deformation characteristics of the surrounding rock at the roof were similar to that at the side wall. 2) Increase of the initial geostress had significant effect on the radial strain rate of the roof (or the side wall) and the tangential strain rate of the corner while not significant on others. 3) The evolution characteristics of AE impact count and damage variable revealed the phased failure process of surrounding rock from micro-fracture initiation, expansion to macro-crack development until the occurrence of main fracture. The time of main fracture occurring may be relatively delayed as the geostress increased, and the relative damage proportion after excavation unloading increased nonlinearly with the increase of the initial geostress. 4) The phenomenon that the peak frequency of AE signal was concentrated with gradually increased amplitude could be regarded as a precursor information of the main fracture occurring in the surrounding rock. The higher the initial geostress, the wider the distribution of the peak frequency concentrated section. 5) As the initial geostress increased, the inner wall of surrounding rock specimens demonstrated the evolution of damage from micro-cracks to abscission layer, and to block fracture of rock mass. The failure modes of rock mass were dominated by the tensile heave in the roof and side wall, and accompanied by the phenomenon of delamination and fragmentation. Furthermore, compression and shear failure were observed at the corner when the specimens lost the bearing capacity.

Key words: initial geostress, rectangular roadway, excavation unloading, deformation failure, acoustic emission

中图分类号: 

  • TD 315
[1] 王本鑫, 金爱兵, 王树亮, 孙浩, . 3D打印交叉节理试件力学破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 39-49.
[2] 王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱 演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[3] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[4] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[5] 徐晓冬, 孙光华, 姚旭龙, 梁学健, 邵陆航, . 基于能量耗散与释放的充填体失稳 尖点突变预警模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3003-3012.
[6] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[7] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[8] 舒芹, 王学滨, 赵扬锋, 白雪元, . 应力球量不变应力跌落方式下非均质岩样 破坏过程数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3465-3472.
[9] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[10] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[11] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[12] 楼烨, 张广清. 压裂液黏度对循环水力压裂影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 109-118.
[13] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[14] 杨道学, 赵奎, 曾鹏, 卓毓龙, . 基于粒子群优化算法的未知波速声发射 定位数值模[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
[15] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 张广东, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, . 不同卸荷速率下矩形巷道变形及 声发射特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3309-3318.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[3] 荣 冠,王思敬,王恩志,刘顺桂. 白鹤滩河谷演化模拟及P2β3玄武岩级别评估[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3013 -3019 .
[4] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[5] 朱泽奇,盛 谦,梅松华,张占荣. 改进的遍布节理模型及其在层状岩体地下工程中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3115 -3121 .
[6] 杨有莲,朱俊高,余 挺,吴晓铭. 土与结构接触面力学特性环剪试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3256 -3260 .
[7] 王 威,王水林,汤 华,周平根. 基于三维GIS的滑坡灾害监测预警系统及应用[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3379 -3385 .
[8] 贾 强,张 鑫,应惠清. 桩基础托换开发地下空间不均匀沉降的数值分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3500 -3504 .
[9] 赵明华,张 玲,曹文贵,马缤辉. 基于弹性地基梁理论的土工格室加筋体变形分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3695 -3699 .
[10] 李维树,黄志鹏,周火明,景 锋. 基于P-R相关性研究的岩石地基承载力优化取值[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3700 -3704 .