›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 819-826.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.026

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

隧道开挖引起邻近单桩水平反应分析

王 雨1,陈文化1,王锦华2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044;2. 铁道第三勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津 300251
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-10 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王雨,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道施工对周围环境影响的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51178035)。

Lateral response of adjacent single pile due to tunneling

WANG Yu1, CHEN Wen-hua1, WANG Jin-hua2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. The Third Railway Survey and Design Institute Group Corporation, Tianjin 300251, China
  • Received:2014-07-10 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (51178035).

摘要: 隧道开挖会降低邻近桩基承载力,如何更为合理评价桩基水平附加响应是需要解决的问题。基于Pasternak双参数地基模型和三折线弹塑性荷载传递模型,采用两阶段分析法,并考虑侧向土体作用及地基土层的非均质特性,提出了更符合实际的单桩水平反应简化分析方法。通过与Winkler地基梁法及边界元法的对比分析,验证了方法的合理性。结合对单桩水平反应的多种影响因素进行参数分析,通过各因素相应的修正系数来对基准工况中单桩最大水平反应进行修正,得到计算工况中单桩的最大水平位移和最大弯矩。分析结果表明,桩基水平位移计算时可忽略侧向土体作用,而弯矩计算时应予以考虑;桩基计算工况的最大水平位移 最大弯矩 与平均地层损失比 呈现线性关系,而与隧道半径R、隧道轴线深度H、桩距隧道中心线距离x及桩身柔度系数 均呈现非线性关系。

关键词: 隧道开挖, 邻近单桩, 水平反应, Pasternak地基模型, 修正系数

Abstract: Tunnel excavation can reduce the bearing capacity of adjacent pile foundation. How to accurately evaluate the additional pile responses is a problem yet to be solved. A simplified analytical method is developed based on a Pasternak-type two-parameter elastic foundation model and a three polyline-elastic-plastic load transfer model; a two-stage analytical method is used and the effect of lateral soil and heterogeneity characteristics of soil are considered. The validity of the proposed method is verified by the comparative analysis of the results obtained from proposed method, Winkler foundation beam method and boundary element method. Combining with parametric studies of the influencing factors of lateral response of a single pile, correction coefficients are used to correct the maximum lateral response of a single pile in the baseline engineering case, the maximum horizontal displacement and the maximum bending moment of a single pile under the calculation working condition are obtained. The results indicate that in calculating the horizontal displacement, the effect of lateral soil can be ignored, while it should be considered in calculating bending moment. The average ground loss ratio is linearly related to while it presents a nonlinear relationship with tunnel radius R, tunnel axis depth H, distance from the center line of the tunnel x and pile flexibility coefficient .

Key words: tunnel excavation, adjacent single pile, lateral response, Pasternak foundation model, correction factors

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[2] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[3] 李海丽,张陈蓉,卢 恺,. 隧道开挖条件下地埋管线的非线性响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 289-296.
[4] 汪恩良,姜海强,韩红卫,解 飞,崔恩彤,. 冻融模型相似性分析及试验验证[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 333-340.
[5] 阮永芬,王熙冬,李志伟,刘克文,. 砂衬齿形桩竖向承载力的小孔扩展理论研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2567-2573.
[6] 符亚鹏,姚志刚,方 勇,陈先国,. 隧道开挖对下伏水平薄煤层采空区地层的扰动及衬砌受荷特征[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 117-125.
[7] 郑帅群,周海祚,郑 刚 , . 压实填土地基承载力深度修正系数研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3240-3252.
[8] 靳军伟 ,杨 敏 ,邓友生 ,刘晨晖 , . 砂土中隧道开挖对邻近桩基竖向影响的简化计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 241-246.
[9] 左永振,程展林,丁红顺,廖建辉. 动力触探杆长修正系数试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1284-1288.
[10] 安建永 ,项彦勇 ,贾永州,. 既有桩基荷载对邻近浅埋隧道开挖效应及支护内力影响的研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 926-932.
[11] 姚志华 ,黄雪峰 , 陈正汉 ,方祥位 ,苗强强 ,张江水,. 关于黄土湿陷性评价和剩余湿陷量的新认识[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 998-1006.
[12] 陈孟乔,刘建坤,肖军华 . 砂土中盾构隧道开挖面失稳土体三维形状分析[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 961-966.
[13] 熊巨华 ,王 远 ,刘 侃 ,孙 庆 . 隧道开挖对邻近单桩竖向受力特性影响[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 475-482.
[14] 张敏静 ,罗 强 ,詹学启 ,张 良 . 高速铁路穿透型CFG桩复合地基沉降计算修正系数分析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 519-525.
[15] 赵 军 ,刘泉声 ,张程远 . 水源热泵井回灌堵塞颗粒迁移模型的建立[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3249-3253.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!