›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1417-1424.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.025

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

收敛约束法中隧道开挖面空间效应方法比较

张常光1,曾开华2, 3   

  1. 1.长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061;2.南昌工程学院 土木与建筑工程学院,江西 南昌 330099; 3.南昌工程学院 江西省水利土木特种加固与安全监控工程研究中心,江西 南昌 330099
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-05 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:张常光,男,1982年生,博士,副教授,主要从事非饱和土与地下工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41202191);江西省自然科学基金项目(No. 20142BAB206001);江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(No. GJJ151117)。

Comparisons of spatial-effect approaches for tunnel excavation using convergence-confinement method

ZHANG Chang-guang1, ZENG Kai-hua2, 3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330099, China; 3. Jiangxi Provincial Engineering Research Center of the Special Reinforcement and Safety Monitoring Technology in Hydraulic & Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330099, China
  • Received:2014-08-05 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41202191), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20142BAB206001) and the Science and Technology Program for Jiangxi Educational Committee (GJJ151117).

摘要: 合理的开挖面空间效应方法是充分调动与发挥围岩自承载能力的前提,对2种代表性的开挖面空间效应方法:T-N(09)支护力系数法和V-D(09)位移释放系数法,进行了来源、因素考虑、适用范围、空间效应实现及收敛约束差异等的定性与定量比较。研究结果表明:2种开挖面空间效应方法都易与围岩特征曲线相结合,便于实际工程应用,且在一定参数范围内二者具有很好的一致性;T-N(09)支护力系数法仅适用于理想弹-塑性围岩,得到的支护压力偏小、围岩稳定变形偏大,应对其材料模型及参数范围进行有效拓展;V-D(09)位移释放系数法适用于各种弹塑性围岩,能较直观地反映开挖面空间效应的变化及影响范围,具有广泛的工程应用前景。

关键词: 开挖面空间效应, 支护力系数, 位移释放系数, 支护压力, 围岩稳定变形

Abstract: A proper spatial effect approach of excavation face is the premise to make full use of the self-bearing capacity of rock mass. In this study, two representative spatial effect approaches of excavation face, i.e., the support stress coefficient approach of T-N (09) and the displacement release coefficient approach of V-D (09), are compared qualitatively and quantitatively about their sources, influencing factors, scopes of application, performances of spatial effect and differences of convergence-confinement and so on. It is found that the two spatial effect approaches of excavation face are both readily combined with ground response curve to practical engineering applications and have good consistency in some range of parameters; the support stress coefficient approach of T-N (09) is only suitable for elastic-perfectly plastic rock, which leads to a smaller support pressure and a larger stable deformation of rock mass, and thus the related material models and parameter ranges should be properly improved. The displacement release coefficient approach of V-D (09) can be applied to various elastoplastic rocks, directly reflecting the changes and influence ranges of spatial effect of excavation face, and thus it has a wide range of engineering applications.

Key words: spatial effect of excavation face, support stress coefficient, displacement release coefficient, support pressure, stable deformation of rock mass

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 张妍珺,苏 凯,周 利,伍鹤皋. 基于收敛-约束法的隧洞纵向变形演化规律研究与支护时机估算[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 471-478.
[2] 梁 桥,杨小礼,张佳华,周文权, . 非均质土体中盾构隧道开挖面支护力上限分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2585-2592.
[3] 冯利坡 ,郑永来 ,邓树新 ,李文峋,. 深埋盾构隧道开挖面三维对数螺旋破坏模式的上限分析[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 2105-2110.
[4] 张子新 ,张 帆 , . 软土地层TBM开挖面支护压力计算模型及可视化[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3193-3200.
[5] 李 铀 ,袁 亮 ,刘冠学 ,金学玉 ,薛俊华 ,余国锋 ,彭 意 ,张 明,. 深部开采圆形巷道围岩破损区与支护压力的确定[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 226-231.
[6] 陈孟乔,刘建坤,肖军华 . 砂土中盾构隧道开挖面失稳土体三维形状分析[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 961-966.
[7] 侯公羽,李晶晶. 弹塑性变形条件下围岩-支护相互作用全过程解析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 961-970.
[8] 乔金丽,张义同,高 健. 考虑渗流的多层土盾构隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1497-1502.
[9] 方 勇,何 川. 土压平衡式盾构掘削面支护压力特性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3528-3532.
[10] 韩月旺 ,钟小春 ,朱 伟 ,虞兴福,. 压力舱土体改良对盾构开挖面稳定影响研究[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 516-520.
[11] 周小文 , 濮家骝 . 砂土中隧洞开挖引起的地面沉降试验研究[J]. , 2002, 23(5): 559-563.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!