›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 2523-2530.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.09.008

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海软黏土的孔径分布试验研究

陈 波1, 2,孙德安2,高 游2,李 健2   

  1. 1. 衢州学院 建筑工程学院,浙江 衢州 324000;2. 上海大学 土木工程系,上海 200444
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-19 出版日期:2017-09-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:陈波,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事软黏土的基本性质及本构模型方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.41402271);衢州市科技计划项目(No.2014Y012);衢州学院中青年学术骨干培养基金(No.XNZQN201514)。

Experimental study of pore-size distribution of Shanghai soft clay

CHEN Bo1, 2, SUN De-an2, GAO You2, LI Jian2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Quzhou University, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
  • Received:2016-08-19 Online:2017-09-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41402271), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Quzhou (2014Y012) and the Academic Backbone Training Fund for Young and Middle-aged Teacher of Quzhou University (XNZQN201514).

摘要: 为研究结构性对软黏土变形特性的影响,对上海软黏土原状样和不同制样方式得到的重塑样、泥浆样和压实样开展了压缩试验和压汞试验,确认固结压力和制样方式对软黏土的孔径大小及分布具有重要影响。试验结果表明:上海软黏土原状样的孔径分布为单峰孔径分布,孔径大小主要分布在0.01~1.00 ?m之间;结构性对孔径分布影响较大,随着固结压力的增大,大孔隙和中孔隙逐渐向小孔隙转化,尤其是固结压力大于结构屈服应力后,这种现象更加明显;不同制样方法得到的重塑样、泥浆样和压实样,在饱和状态下的孔径分布均为单峰孔径分布,但不同制样方式得到的土样孔径分布差别较大,压实样的孔径相对较大,泥浆样的孔径分布较为集中;随着固结压力的增大,不同制样方法在相近孔隙比下的土样孔径分布差别虽然有所减小,但仍无法达到相同或接近,即固结压力无法消除制样方式对土体孔径分布的影响。用简单表示组构的参考孔隙比对不同土样的压缩曲线进行归一化整理,得到4种土样的压缩曲线可归一化为一条相关度极高的直线,说明参考孔隙比用于简单表述土体的组构是合理、有效的。

关键词: 上海软黏土, 压汞试验, 孔径分布, 结构性, 参考孔隙比

Abstract: To study the effect of soil structure on deformation characteristics, a series of odometer and mercury intrusion porosimetry tests on undisturbed, remolded, reconstituted and compacted samples of Shanghai soft clay, was carried out to obtain the compression curves and the pore-size distributions (PSD) of samples. The test results show that consolidation pressures and sample preparations have important influence on the PSD curves, and the PSD of undisturbed sample of Shanghai soft clay exhibits a unimodal shape, with a pore-size mainly ranging from 0.01 to 1.0 ?m. The unimodal PSD of undisturbed sample is greatly influenced by soil structure. Large and medium interparticle pores are compressed into the small interparticle pores with increasing consolidation pressures, particularly under the consolidation pressure larger than the structural yield stress. The unimodal PSD also was found in saturated soft clay, no matter undisturbed, remolded, reconstituted or compacted samples. However, the PSD curves of samples using different sample preparation methods are different. The compacted samples have larger pore size and the reconstituted samples generate uniform pore size. The differences of micro-pore structure among different samples will be reduced with increasing consolidation pressure, yet never eliminated even at large consolidation pressure. Lastly, the reference void ratio, i.e., a simple expression of clay fabric, is used to normalized the compression curves of the samples with different preparation. Different compression curves of four types’ samples are normalized to a high correlative unified compression curve, which shows that the reference void ratio is a reasonable and effective parameter to illustrate the PSD of clay.

Key words: Shanghai soft clay, mercury intrusion porosimetry, pore-size distribution, soil structure, reference void ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[2] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[3] 牛庚, 邵龙潭, 孙德安, 韦昌富, 郭晓霞, 徐华. 土−水特征曲线测量过程中孔隙分布的演化规律探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1195-1202.
[4] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[5] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[6] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[7] 张玉伟, 翁效林, 宋战平, 谢永利, . 考虑黄土结构性和各向异性的修正剑桥模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1030-1038.
[8] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, . 陇东Q3结构性黄土压剪损伤本构模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3855-3870.
[9] 姚志华, 陈正汉, 方祥位, 黄雪峰, . 非饱和原状黄土弹塑性损伤流固耦 合模型及其初步应用 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 216-226.
[10] 段晓梦,曾立峰, . 非饱和土的承载结构与岩土广义结构性[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3103-3112.
[11] 王丽琴,邵生俊,赵 聪,鹿忠刚,. 黄土初始结构性对其压缩屈服的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3223-3228.
[12] 丑亚玲,郏书胜,张庆海,曹 伟,盛 煜,. 考虑结构性的冻融作用对黄土湿陷系数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2715-2722.
[13] 姚志华,连 杰,陈正汉,朱元青,方祥位,. 考虑细观结构演化的非饱和Q3 原状黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1553-1563.
[14] 孙 凯,陈正林,路德春,. 一种考虑黏聚强度的改良土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1589-1597.
[15] 牛 庚,孙德安,韦昌富,颜荣涛,. 基于孔径分布的全风化泥岩持水曲线推算[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1337-1345.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!