岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 737-742.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1276

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非均质边坡稳定性上限分析评价研究

王 珍1, 2,曹兰柱1,王 东1   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 矿业学院,辽宁 阜新 123000;2. 黄河科技学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450000
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-25 出版日期:2019-02-11 发布日期:2019-02-14
  • 作者简介:王珍,女,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程领域的科研和教学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    高等学校博士学科点专项基金(No. 20122121110003);辽宁省煤炭资源安全开采与洁净利用工程研究中心开放基金(No. LNTU15KF08)

Evaluation on upper limit of heterogeneous slope stability

WANG Zhen1, 2, CAO Lan-zhu1, WANG Dong1   

  1. 1. School of Mining, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Huanghe Science and Technology College, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • Received:2017-08-25 Online:2019-02-11 Published:2019-02-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Special Foundation of University Doctoral Degree(20122121110003) and the Open Foundation of Liaoning Province Research Center of Resources Safe Mining and Clean Utilization(LNTU15KF08).

摘要: 边坡稳定性评价研究是土力学经典问题。为研究非均质边坡稳定性问题,以上限分析法为理论基础,建立非均质边坡分段对数螺旋线破坏机构。应用拟合多项式近似描述对数螺旋线,计算破坏机构外力功率和内能耗散率,应用设计的计算流程进行强度折减循环计算,使边坡逐步过渡至极限平衡状态,确定边坡安全系数。以某露天矿南帮边坡为工程背景,经过反复强度折减,最终确定安全系数,通过变换初值的方式验证计算流程的稳定性,应用严格Morgenstern-Price法验证计算结果的准确性。研究结果表明:该流程性能稳定,不受初始值影响。相比于严格Morgenstern-Price法,二者安全系数计算结果偏差小于5%,可充分满足工程实践要求。同时,上限分析法求得的最危险滑面满足速度分离关系,具有更强的工程参考价值。

关键词: 非均质边坡, 上限分析法, 对数螺旋线, 函数拟合, 强度折减

Abstract: Slope stability evaluation is a classic problem for soil mechanics. In order to study the stability of heterogeneous slopes, this paper uses the upper limit analysis method to establish the failure mechanism of segmented logarithmic spiral arcs for heterogeneous slope. Then fitting polynomial is used to approximately describe the logarithmic spiral arcs. External force power and internal energy dissipation power of the failure mechanism can be determined. The calculation process is applied to repeat the strength reduction until the slope gradually transition to the ultimate balance and the slope stability factor can be obtained. Taking the south slope in an open-pit mine as the background, the slope stability factor is determined by the method of repeated strength reduction. The stability of the calculation process is verified by the method of changing initial value, and the accuracy of the calculation result is verified by the method of strict Morgenstern-Price. The results show that the process is stable and is not affected by the initial value. Compared with the strict Morgenstern-Price method, the difference of stability factor calculation results between the two methods is less than 5%. The stability factor calculation results can fully satisfy the requirements of engineering practice. At the same time, the most dangerous slip surface formed by upper limit analysis method can satisfy the speed separation relationship.

Key words: heterogeneous slope, upper limit analysis, logarithmic spiral arc, fitting function, strength reduction

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[2] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[3] 李清川,李术才,王汉鹏,张红军,张 冰,张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[4] 涂义亮,刘新荣,钟祖良,杜立兵,王 鹏, . 三类边坡失稳判据的统一性[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 173-180.
[5] 朱彦鹏,杨晓宇,马孝瑞,杨校辉,叶帅华, . 边坡稳定性分析双折减法的几个问题[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 331-338.
[6] 郑 刚,聂东清,刁 钰,程雪松,. 基坑多级支护破坏模式研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 313-322.
[7] 刘路路,宋 亮,焦玉勇,王 浩,张秀丽,谢壁婷, . 库水位波动条件下黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体稳定性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 359-366.
[8] 程 恒,傅志浩,张国新,杨 波,江晨芳,. 五嘎冲拱坝坝肩加固效果分析及整体安全度评价[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 374-380.
[9] 王金梅,张迎宾,赵兴权,余鹏程,王 潘,侯瑞彬,黄小福,魏 涛,. 用点接触模拟滑面的滑坡稳定性分析方法[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2746-2756.
[10] 聂治豹,郑 宏,张 谭. 基于强度折减法确定边坡临界滑面的小波变换法[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1827-1831.
[11] 闫 超,刘松玉,邓永锋, . 一种基于强度折减法的刚性桩复合地基整体稳定性评价方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 875-882.
[12] 许胜才,张信贵,马福荣,陈子兴, . 水泥土桩加固边坡变形破坏特性及模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3187-3196.
[13] 张玉成 ,杨光华 ,张有祥 ,钟志辉 ,胡海英,. 古滑坡滑带土的力学特性与库水位变化对其稳定性影响及加固措施[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 43-52.
[14] 韩龙强,吴顺川,李志鹏, . 基于Hoek-Brown准则的非等比强度折减方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 690-696.
[15] 王 双,李小春,石 露,刘召胜,. 物质点强度折减法及其在边坡中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2672-2678.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!