›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 359-366.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.044

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

库水位波动条件下黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体稳定性研究

刘路路1, 2,宋 亮3,焦玉勇1,王 浩1,张秀丽1,谢壁婷1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100040; 3. 贵州省交通规划勘察设计研究院股份有限公司,贵州 贵阳550081
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-14 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:刘路路,男,1991年生,硕士研究生,主要从事滑带涉水劣化机理的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2011CB710602);国家自然科学基金(No.51509243, No.51479191)。

Study of stability of Huangtupo riverside slumping mass #1 under reservoir water level fluctuations

LIU Lu-lu1, 2, SONG Liang3, JIAO Yu-yong1, WANG Hao1, ZHANG Xiu-li1, XIE Bi-ting1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China; 3. Guizhou Provincial Communications Planning & Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China)
  • Received:2016-07-14 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB710602) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (51509243, 51479191).

摘要: 水库蓄水是诱发三峡地区库岸滑坡的主要因素之一,开展库水位波动条件下滑坡稳定性研究意义重大。通过现场地质调查、原位监测、理论分析和数值模拟等手段,对三峡库区黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体在库水位波动条件下的稳定性进行了研究。利用现场监测数据,分析了滑坡体地下水位与库区水位的关系、滑坡体深部不同高程处位移随时间的变化值以及库水位波动对滑坡体变形的影响。采用三维离散元程序“3DDEC”,对临江1#崩滑堆积体进行了数值模拟,分析了库水位波动条件下滑坡体内应力、应变的变化规律,并提出了考虑干湿循环作用的强度折减法,定义了安全系数的求解方法。研究结果表明,三维离散元法结合强度折减法研究水库滑坡是可行的;黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体在目前的调水曲线作用下处于稳定状态;由2013年12月16日巴东地震前后滑坡堆积体的变形可现低烈度地震对滑坡体的稳定性影响不大。

关键词: 黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体, 地下水位、深部位移, 三维离散元, 强度折减法, 数值模拟

Abstract: Because reservoir water is one of the master factor inducing slope landslide in the Three Gorges area, it is significant to study the stability of landslide under the condition of water level fluctuation of reservoirs. We make a study of the stability of Huangtupo riverside slumping mass #1 in Three Gorges area under the condition of water level fluctuation of reservoirs by the measure of geologic survey and in situ monitoring and theoretical analysis as well as numerical simulation. We make a study of the relationship between reservoir water level and the landslide groundwater level in the place mentioned above based on the analysis of field monitoring data. And we also analyze the deep displacement changed over time at different altitudes of the landslide as well as the influence of the variation of water level of reservoirs on the deformation of landslide via the same data. We make a simulation of landslide mentioned above through “3DDEC” and analyze the changeable rule of stress-strain of landslide under the variation of water level of reservoirs; and we put forward the strength reduction method considering the action of drying-wetting cycle and define the method to solve the safety factor. The results show that: it is reasonable adopting “3DDEC” to anlyze sliding slope; Huangtupo riverside slumping mass #1 is in a stable state under the action of current water transfer curve; in particular, we find that the low seismic intensity has little effect on the stability of the landslide based on the analysis of the deformation of the slumping mass before and after the Badong earthquake in December 16, 2013.

Key words: Huangtupo riverside slumping mass #1, groundwater level, deep displacement, 3D discrete elements, strength reduction method, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU444

[1] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[4] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[5] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[6] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[7] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[8] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[9] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[10] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[11] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[12] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[13] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[14] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[15] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!