岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1933-1943.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究

史林肯1, 2,周辉1, 2,宋明3,卢景景1, 2,张传庆1, 2,路新景4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430056;4. 黄河勘测规划设计有限公司,河南 郑州 450003
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-10 修回日期:2019-10-31 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:史林肯,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道及地下空间稳定性分析方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41941018,No.51709257);国家重点基础发展研究计划项目(973计划)(No.2014CB046902)。

Physical experimental study on excavation disturbance of TBM in deep composite strata

SHI Lin-ken1, 2, ZHOU Hui1, 2, SONG Ming3, LU Jing-jing1, 2, ZHANG Chuan-qing1, 2, LU Xin-jing4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. CCCC Second Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China; 4. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China
  • Received:2019-06-10 Revised:2019-10-31 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 周辉,男,1972年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩石力学试验、理论、数值分析与工程安全性分析方面的研究。E-mail: hzhou@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:shilinken16@mails.ucas.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41941018, 51709257) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB046902).

摘要: 针对全断面隧道掘进机(TBM)开挖过程掌子面岩体软硬交替变化的特点,以兰州水源地建设工程为背景,采用模型试验与数值模拟方法研究了复合地层TBM开挖过程隧洞围岩的动态响应规律。通过开展相似配比试验配制了不同围岩强度比的复合地层岩体相似材料,运用光纤光栅技术全程捕捉了隧洞开挖过程复合地层应变演化规律,并分析了隧洞围岩的宏观破裂形态。模型试验结果表明:TBM推进过程中复合地层应变变化规律体现了掌子面推进的空间效应,软岩部分应变要大于硬岩部分应变,且随着开挖步数的增加两种岩层应变差值越大;隧洞内岩体完全挖除后,围岩宏观破裂形态表明因复合地层岩体物理力学性质的差异,上覆软岩变形破坏较为严重,破裂和变形较为显著,在软、硬岩层交界面出现“变形不协调”现象。选取工程沿线某洞段的地质力学参数,基于破坏接近度(FAI)指标评价了隧洞开挖过程中复合地层围岩的稳定性,数值结果表明:开挖过程软岩中FAI变化较为明显,塑性区和破坏区分布范围更广,而下部硬岩受开挖扰动影响较小,只有拱底小范围岩体进入破坏状态。模型试验和数值结果均说明交替变化的掌子面岩体在开挖过程中其围岩在变形破坏等规律方面存在明显差异,因此,TBM在复合地层施工可采取重点部位监测预警、提前采取相应措施等手段,减少或避免卡机事故的发生。该研究成果对于指导复合地层TBM施工具有一定的借鉴和指导意义。

关键词: 复合地层, 模型试验, 全断面隧道掘进机(TBM), 输水隧洞, 破坏接近度, 数值模拟

Abstract: In view of the alternating change of soft and hard rock mass in the work face, physical model test and numerical simulation were conducted to investigate the dynamic response of tunnel surrounding rock during the process of TBM excavation in composite strata at the Lanzhou water source construction project. Similar composite rock mass materials with different strength ratios of surrounding rock were prepared by performing analogous proportion experiments. The fiber grating technology was used to capture the strain evolution law of surrounding rock in composite strata during tunnel excavation, and the macroscopic fracture morphology of the surrounding rock of the tunnel was also analyzed. The physical experimental results show that the variation law of strain in composite strata during the TBM propulsion process reflects the spatial effect of the face thrust. The strain of soft rock is greater than that of hard rock, and with the increase of excavation steps, the difference of strain between two rock strata becomes greater. After the excavation, the macroscopic fracture morphology of surrounding rock indicates that the deformation and failure of the overlying soft rock is more serious and significant due to the difference in physical and mechanical properties of the composite rock mass. The phenomenon of “uncoordinated deformation” can also be found at the interface between soft and hard rock layers. The geomechanical parameters of a tunnel section along the project are selected to evaluate the stability of surrounding rock in composite strata during tunnel excavation based on the failure approach index (FAI). The numerical results show that FAI changes obviously in soft rock during excavation, and the plastic zone and failure zone are more widely distributed, while the lower hard rock is less affected by excavation disturbance, and only a small range of rock mass at the arch bottom enters the failure state during excavation. Both the model test and the numerical results indicate that there are differences in change laws in the deformation and failure of the surrounding rock during the excavation process. Therefore, the construction of TBM in the composite stratum can take measures such as monitoring and early warning of key parts as well as early corresponding measures reduce or avoid the occurrence of TBM jamming accidents.

Key words: composite strata, physical experiment, tunnel boring machine (TBM), water conveyance tunnel, failure approach index, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • U455.4
[1] 陈猛, 崔秀文, 颜鑫, 王浩, 王二磊. 岩石−钢纤维混凝土复合层抗压强度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 638-646.
[2] 石峰, 卢坤林, 尹志凯. 平移模式下刚性挡土墙三维被动滑裂面的确定与土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 735-745.
[3] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[4] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[5] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[6] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[7] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[8] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[9] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[10] 金爱兵, 陈帅军, 赵安宇, 孙浩, 张玉帅, . 基于无人机摄影测量的露天矿边坡数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 255-264.
[11] 李军, 翟文宝, 陈朝伟, 柳贡慧, 周英操, . 基于零厚度内聚力单元的水力裂缝 随机扩展方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 265-279.
[12] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[13] 刘润, 曹添铭, 陈广思, 张海洋, 李成凤. 插拔桩靴对临近桩靴承载力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2943-2952.
[14] 孟敏强, 王磊, 蒋翔, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 基于尺寸效应的粗粒土单颗粒破碎试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2953-2962.
[15] 曾超峰, 薛秀丽, 宋伟炜, 李淼坤, 白宁. 开挖前降水引发基坑变形机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2963-2972.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[2] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[3] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[4] 张建国,张强勇,杨文东,张 欣. 大岗山水电站坝区初始地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3071 -3078 .
[5] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[6] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[7] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[8] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[9] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .
[10] 王星华,章 敏,王随新. 考虑渗流及软化的海底隧道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3267 -3272 .