岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 255-264.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0697

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于无人机摄影测量的露天矿边坡数值模拟

金爱兵1, 2,陈帅军1, 2,赵安宇3,孙浩1, 2,张玉帅1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083; 3. 苏宁置业集团有限公司,江苏 南京 210042
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-25 修回日期:2020-09-11 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 孙浩,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,主要从事采矿工艺与理论、岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: sunhao2019@ustb.edu.cn E-mail:jinaibing@ustb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:金爱兵,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51674015,No. 52004017);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No. FRF-TP-19-026A1);中国博士后科学基金(No. 2020M670138)

Numerical simulation of open-pit mine slope based on unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry

JIN Ai-bing1, 2, CHEN Shuai-jun1, 2, ZHAO An-yu3, SUN Hao1, 2, ZHANG Yu-shuai1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. Suning Real Estate Group Co. Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China
  • Received:2020-05-25 Revised:2020-09-11 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51674015, 52004017), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRF-TP-19-026A1) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project (2020M670138).

摘要: 数值模拟是露天矿山边坡稳定性分析的常用方法,边坡模型构建是数值模拟的基础,地形测量的准确性对于边坡稳定性分析精度具有十分重要的影响。近年来,低空低速小型无人机(UAV)被广泛应用于地质调查中,为复杂条件下地形快速测量提供了一种可行的方法。针对露天矿山边坡坡形更新快、地形复杂、人工测量困难的情况,采用搭载单镜头小型无人机,对露天矿山边坡进行低空摄影测量,并通过飞行试验,对比研究了无人机搭载镜头旋转角度对边坡测量精度的影响,最终得到高精度边坡数字高程模型(DEM),并通过Surfer、Rhino等软件转化为三维FLAC模型,实现从无人机测量到三维数值模型的快速建立。得到以下可供参考的研究结论:在目标边坡坡度小于45°时,无人机搭载镜头旋转角度不同对边坡测量精度有较大影响,当镜头旋转角度介于70°~90°时,获得的测量精度较高;与人工测量相比,无人机摄影测量获得的边坡坡形更符合真实边坡实际坡型;无人机航拍照片经过PhotoScan、Surfer、Rhino等软件的转化,能够快速建立三维数值模型,并获得更好的数值模拟计算结果,满足边坡稳定性分析需要。

关键词: 无人机, 摄影测量, 矿山边坡, 数值模拟, FLAC模型

Abstract: Numerical simulation is a normal method for slope stability analysis in open-pit mines. Slope model construction is the basis of numerical simulation, and the accuracy of topographic measurement data has an important influence on the accuracy of slope stability analysis. In recent years, low-altitude and low-speed small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been widely used in geological surveys, which provide a feasible method for rapid terrain measurement under complex conditions. Considering the situation of the rapid change of slope shape of the open-pit mine, the complex terrain, and the difficulty of manual measurement, a single-lens small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was used to perform low-altitude photogrammetry on an open-pit mine slope. Through UAV flight tests, the influence of the rotation angle of the UVA mounted lens on the slope measurement accuracy was compared and studied. Finally, a high-precision slope digital elevation model (DEM) was obtained, which was converted into a three-dimensional FLAC3D model using several softwares such as Surfer and Rhino. A rapid establishment was realized from the UAV measurement to the 3D numerical model. The following research conclusions can be obtained for reference: when the target slope is less than 45°, the rotation angle of UAV mounted lens has a large influence on the slope measurement accuracy. When the lens rotation angle is between 70° and 90°, relatively higher measurement accuracy can be obtained. Compared with manual measurement, the slope shape obtained by the UAV photogrammetry is more in line with the actual slope shape. After a series transformation of the aerial photos of UAV using the PhotoScan, Surfer, Rhino, etc., a 3D numerical model can be quickly built, and better numerical simulation results can be obtain to meet the needs of slope stability analysis.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), photogrammetry, mine slope, numerical simulation, FLAC model

中图分类号: 

  • P 231
[1] 王兆耀, 刘红军, 杨奇, 赵真, 胡瑞庚, . 波流作用下大直径单桩的局部冲刷特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1178-1185.
[2] 陈猛, 崔秀文, 颜鑫, 王浩, 王二磊. 岩石−钢纤维混凝土复合层抗压强度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 638-646.
[3] 石峰, 卢坤林, 尹志凯. 平移模式下刚性挡土墙三维被动滑裂面的确定与土压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 735-745.
[4] 李军, 翟文宝, 陈朝伟, 柳贡慧, 周英操, . 基于零厚度内聚力单元的水力裂缝 随机扩展方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 265-279.
[5] 孟敏强, 王磊, 蒋翔, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 基于尺寸效应的粗粒土单颗粒破碎试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2953-2962.
[6] 岳建勇. 地铁交通引起的建筑物振动实测与数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2756-2764.
[7] 邓玮婷, 丁选明, 彭宇, . 珊瑚砂地基中膨胀混凝土桩竖向受压承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2814-2820.
[8] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[9] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[10] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[11] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[12] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[13] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[14] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[15] 张传庆, 吕浩安, 刘小岩, 周辉, 高阳, 闫东明, . 隧道新型恒阻让压装置的工作机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4045-4053.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[6] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[7] 孙 勇. 滑坡面下双排抗滑结构的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2971 -2977 .
[8] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[9] 李 磊,朱 伟 ,林 城,大木宜章. 干湿循环条件下固化污泥的物理稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3001 -3004 .
[10] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .