›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3773-3782.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0231

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海黏土压缩指数和回弹指数经验关系

何 平1, 2，王卫东1, 3, 4，徐中华3, 4   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092；2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 200092； 3. 华东建筑设计研究院有限公司上海地下空间与工程设计研究院，上海 200011；4. 上海基坑工程环境安全控制工程技术研究中心，上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-07 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
  • 作者简介:何平，男，1988年生，博士研究生，主要从事基坑工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦江人才计划项目(No. 15PJ1433500)

Empirical correlations of compression index and swelling index for Shanghai clay

HE Ping1, 2, WANG Wei-dong1, 3, 4, XU Zhong-hua3, 4   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Underground Space Engineering Design & Research Institute, East China Architecture Design & Research Institute , Shanghai 200011, China; 4. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Safety Control for Facilities Adjacent to Deep Excavations, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2018-02-07 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Shanghai Pujiang Program (15PJ1433500).

PDF (Chinese)

1097

摘要： 压缩指数Cc和回弹指数Cs是土力学中表征土体变形特性的两个重要参数指标，可通过室内一维固结试验获得。但是试验过程耗时长，因此，很多学者提出了压缩指数Cc与物理指标（尤其是液限wL、天然含水率wn、初始孔隙比e0和塑性指数Ip）的经验关系。通过对比国内外压缩指数经验关系，发现压缩指数与天然含水率和孔隙比关系离散性较小，分别给出了一个统一的经验关系。采用薄壁取土器从上海某一场地取得第②～⑥层土的原状土样进行固结试验，并搜集整理分析已有文献中的试验数据和上海69个场地的岩土勘察数据，给出了上海典型土层压缩指数Cc与wL、wn、e0、Ip的经验关系。同时发现，Cc/n0与Cc以及Cs/n0与Cs（n0为初始孔隙率）之间具有高度的线性关系，从而给出了基于初始孔隙率n0预测上海黏土压缩指数Cc和回弹指数Cs的经验关系。分析了压缩指数和回弹指数的关系，结果表明，上海正常固结黏土Cc/Cs分布在4.8～6.9之间，平均值约为5.8；超固结黏土Cc/Cs分布在3.3～5.2之间，平均值约为4.3。

关键词: 压缩指数, 回弹指数, 上海黏土, 初始孔隙率, 经验关系

Abstract: Compression index Cc and swelling index Cs are two important deformation parameters in soil mechanics which can be obtained by oedometer tests. However, due to time-consuming of the test, several empirical correlations between compression index and some basic physical parameters (especially liquid limit wL, natural water content wn, initial void ratio e0 and plastic index Ip) have been proposed by many researchers. The empirical relationships of compression index all over the world have been compared and it is found that relationships between compression index and natural water content and void ratio are less discrete. Consequently, the unified correlation equations are given respectively. The oedometer tests have been conducted on specimens from 2nd to 6th soil layers in Shanghai. Samples were retrieved by the thin wall sampler. Consolidation test data available in literatures and geotechnical investigation data from 69 sites in Shanghai were collected and analyzed. Empirical relationships between compression index Cc and wL, wn, e0, Ip of Shanghai clay were given. Meanwhile, it was noted that there were highly linear relationships between Cc /n0 and Cc, Cs /n0 and Cs (n0 is initial porosity). Therefore, empirical formulas for predicting compression index Cc and swelling index Cs of Shanghai clay based on n0 were given. The relationship between compression index and swelling index was also analyzed. The results show that the value of Cc/Cs of Shanghai normally consolidated clay ranges from 4.8 to 6.9, with an average value of 5.8. While the value of Cc /Cs for over-consolidated clay ranges from 3.3 to 5.2, with an average value of 4.3.

Key words: compression index, swelling index, Shanghai clay, initial porosity, empirical relationship

中图分类号: 

  • TU 442
[1] 宋云奇，武朝军，叶冠林,. 上海浅部黏土渗透系数及其各向异性[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2139-2144.
[2] 高彦斌，张松波，葛潇楠，. 我国沿海地区软黏土压缩指数统计及与国外其他地区对比[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2713-2720.
[3] 刘维正 ，瞿 帅 ，张军辉，. 天然沉积结构性黏土原位压缩规律及预测模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 101-108.
[4] 李 青 . 侧装式弯曲元测量软黏土剪切波速的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 413-416.
[5] 璩继立，李贝贝，李陈财，刘宝石，魏天乐. 棕榈加筋上海黏土强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 142-148.
[6] 武朝军，叶冠林，王建华. 上海浅部土层压缩指数与天然含水率的关系[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3184-3190.
[7] 盛佳韧，武朝军，叶冠林，王建华. 上海黏土强度特性真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 47-52.
[8] 车东日 罗春泳 沈水龙 . 水泥混合上海黏土pH值和电导率与强度特性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3611-.
[9] 黄英豪 ，朱 伟 ，周宣兆 ，张春雷 . 固化淤泥压缩特性的试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2923-2928.
[10] 卢萌盟，谢康和，王玉林，蔡 新. 碎石桩复合地基非线性固结解析解[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1833-1840.
[11] 孙德安，陈 波，周 科. 重塑上海软土的压缩和剪切变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1389-1394.
[12] 王志萍，胡敏云，夏玲涛. 垃圾填土压缩特性的室内试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1681-1686.
[13] 刘颖； 朱莉； 仝筠；. 论抗震规范的砂土液化判别方法[J]. , 1979, 1(2): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发