岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4220-4228.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1615

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

动载下土工格栅加筋桥台挡墙承载性能分析

王家全，徐良杰，黄世斌，刘政权   

  1. 广西科技大学 土木建筑工程学院，广西 柳州 545006
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-03 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-11-13
  • 作者简介:王家全，男，1981年生，博士，教授，主要从事加筋结构、细观岩土力学、地基基础等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（No. 41962017, No. 51469005）；广西自然科学基金项目（No. 2017GXNSFAA198170）；广西学位与研究生教育创新计划项目（No. YCSW2018201）。

Bearing capacity analysis of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load

WANG Jia-quan, XU Liang-jie, HUANG Shi-bin, LIU Zheng-quan   

  1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China
  • Received:2018-09-03 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-11-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China(41962017, 51469005), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province of China(2017GXNSFAA198170) and Guangxi University of Science and Technology Graduate Education Innovation Program(YCSW2018201).

PDF (Chinese)

229

摘要： 为研究加筋土桥台结构在顶部条基动载作用下的动力响应问题，通过MTS伺服加载系统施加循环动载，开展室内加筋桥台挡墙动载破坏试验，对比分析3种格栅长度和3类格栅型式的加筋土挡墙沉降及面板水平位移、土压力、筋材应变等参数的分布规律，揭示加筋桥台挡墙的动力承载性能。试验结果表明：在循环动载下不同格栅长度及型式的加筋桥台挡墙破坏模式存在差异，M、A、B型格栅加筋长度 1.0H（H为挡墙高）的挡墙破坏模式均为冲切剪切破坏，A、B型格栅 0.7H和 0.4H的挡墙破坏模式为局部剪切破坏。加筋桥台挡墙面板侧移随筋材长度增加依次减小，A型格栅加筋土挡墙侧移系数总体上相比B型小。桥台挡墙因加筋格栅长度及型式不同导致动土压力衰减规律差异明显，当 1.0H时M型及A型筋材竖向动土压力衰减系数沿墙高呈抛物线函数模型，当 0.7H时，A型和B型筋材竖向动土压力衰减系数沿墙高皆呈指数函数模型。

关键词: 桥台挡墙, 土工格栅, 承载性能, 动力特性

Abstract: To investigate the dynamic response of reinforced earth abutment structure under dynamic action of the top strip footing, dynamic load failure test of the indoor reinforced abutment retaining wall was carried out by MTS servo loading system with cyclic dynamic load. Comparative analysis of the reinforced earth retaining wall parameters with three grid lengths and three grid types, such as settlement of reinforced soil retaining wall, horizontal displacement of the panel, earth pressure and strain of the reinforcement, etc. hence revealing the dynamic bearing capacity of reinforced abutment retaining wall. The test results show that there are differences in failure modes of different geogrid lengths and types of reinforced abutment retaining walls under cyclic dynamic loading. When 1.0H, the failure modes of retaining wall of M-A-B-type geogrids are punching shear failure. And when 0.7H and 0.4H, the failure mode of retaining wall of A-type and B-type geogrids are local shear failure. The lateral displacement of the reinforced abutment retaining wall panel decreases with increasing reinforcement length, and the lateral displacement coefficient of the A-type grid reinforced retaining wall is generally smaller than that of the B-type. Due to the length and type of the reinforced geogrid, the abutment retaining wall has significant difference in the attenuation law of the dynamic earth pressure. When 1.0H, the vertical dynamic earth pressure attenuation coefficient of M-type and A-type geogrids are parabolic function along the wall height. When 0.7H, the vertical dynamic earth pressure attenuation coefficient of A-type and B-type geogrids are exponential function along the wall height.

Key words: abutment soil retaining wall, geogrid, bearing behavior, dynamic characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • U 417
[1] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[2] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[3] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[4] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[5] 刘方成, 吴孟桃, 杨 峻, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶砂强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[6] 汪益敏，闫 岑，于 恒，李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[7] 周佳锦，龚晓南，严天龙，张日红, . 软土地区填砂竹节桩抗压承载性能研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3425-3432.
[8] 任非凡, 何江洋, 王 冠, 赵其华, . 基于交变移动本构模型的粗粒土 动力特性数值解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4627-4641.
[9] 王家全，张亮亮，刘政权，周圆兀. 土工格栅加筋砂土地基大模型动载试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3539-3547.
[10] 王志杰，Felix Jacobs，Martin Ziegler，. 土工格栅横肋对加筋砾石强度与变形特性的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2234-2240.
[11] 詹金武，李 涛. 破碎泥岩注浆结石体动力特性的SHPB试验及其数值模拟研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2096-2102.
[12] 唐晓松，郑颖人，王永甫，冯雨实，. 关于土工格栅合理网孔尺寸的研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1583-1588.
[13] 王家全，周岳富，唐咸远，黄世斌，. 可视大模型加筋土直剪数采仪的研发与应用[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1533-1540.
[14] 郑俊杰，曹文昭，周燕君，江金国. 三向土工格栅筋-土界面特性拉拔试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 317-324.
[15] 陈 俊，符文熹，戴 峰，邓建辉. 用于填筑路堤加固的竹筋格栅力学性能[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 174-179.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发