岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1540-1548.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0882

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

礁灰岩-混凝土界面剪切特性试验研究

刘海峰1,朱长歧1,汪稔1,王新志1,崔翔1, 2,王天民1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-16 修回日期:2019-09-16 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 朱长歧,男,1963年生,硕士,研究员,主要从事海洋工程地质、胶结钙质土的力学特性及地基加固理论的研究工作。E-mail: cqzhu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:hfliu@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘海峰,男,1989年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事海洋钙质沉积物的工程力学特性的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(No. XDA13010201,No. XDA13010301);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41877271)。

Shear test on reef limestone-concrete bonding interface

LIU Hai-feng1, ZHU Chang-qi1, WANG Ren1, WANG Xin-zhi1, CUI Xiang1, 2, WANG Tian-min1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-05-16 Revised:2019-09-16 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA13010201, XDA13010301) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877271).

摘要: 为探究礁灰岩地层中钻孔灌注嵌岩桩的桩-岩界面剪切作用规律,试验选取南海某岛礁的块状结构、砾块结构、砾屑结构及砂屑结构礁灰岩岩芯,开展室内物理力学性质试验及常法向应力条件下的礁灰岩-混凝土界面剪切强度试验研究,探究桩-岩界面剪应力-剪切位移关系曲线的变化规律。开展红砂岩-混凝土界面剪切对比试验,揭示两种不同沉积作用类型的岩石与混凝土黏结面产生剪切强度差异的根本原因。试验结果表明:礁灰岩-混凝土界面的剪切强度受礁灰岩的结构类型、桩-岩强度比等因素影响;由于水泥浆在礁灰岩中的扩散填充作用,礁灰岩-混凝土界面的黏结力和内摩擦角均高于砂岩-混凝土界面;桩-岩强度比产生的界面剪切强度响应受礁灰岩结构类型的影响,低桩-岩强度比时,块状结构、砾块结构礁灰岩-混凝土界面的黏结力均高于高强度比条件;桩-岩强度比增大,块状结构礁灰岩-混凝土界面的内摩擦角增加,而砾块结构礁灰岩-混凝土界面的内摩擦角变化不大。

关键词: 珊瑚礁灰岩, 嵌岩桩, 界面剪切, 结构类型, 强度比

Abstract: This project planed to investigate the law of shear action in pile-rock interface of bored rock-socketed pile in reef limestone stratum. For this purpose, the shear test, physical and mechanic property test were performed on the four structure types of reef limestone core samples including framestone, bindstone, rudstone and bioclastic limestone which were sampled from a certain core reef in South China sea. In this way, the variation law of shear stress-shear displacement curve of pile-rock interface was explored. Meanwhile, shear test on the interface between red sandstone and concrete was also carried out to reveal the basic reason for the difference of shear strength between two different sedimentary types of rock and concrete bond surfaces. Based upon these, the investigation suggested that shear strength of reef limestone-concrete interface was affected by the structure type of reef limestone and the strength ratio of pile-rock interface. As a result of the diffusive filling effect of cement slurry in reef limestone, the cohesive force and internal friction angle of the interface between reef limestone and concrete were both larger than those of sandstone-concrete interface. The shear strength response of the strength ratio of pile-rock interface was influenced by the type of reef limestone structure. Cohesive force of the limestone-concrete interface of framestone and bindstone were both larger at a small strength ratio of pile-rock interface than that at a large strength ratio. Internal friction angle of the interface between framestone and concrete was bigger at a large strength ratio of pile-rock interface than that at a small strength ratio while this index changed little in the bindstone -concrete interface.

Key words: coral reef limestone, rock-socketed piles, interface shear test, structural types, strength ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 刘海峰, 郑坤, 朱长歧, 孟庆山, 吴文娟. 基于应力−应变曲线的礁灰岩脆性特征评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 673-680.
[2] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[3] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 吴文娟, . 不同结构类型珊瑚礁灰岩弹性波特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3081-3089.
[4] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[5] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[6] 刘海峰,朱长歧,孟庆山,王 星,李小刚,吴文娟, . 礁灰岩嵌岩桩的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1581-1588.
[7] 万志辉,戴国亮,龚维明, . 珊瑚礁灰岩层后压浆桩增强效应作用机制[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 467-473.
[8] 吕小波,赵其华,韩 刚. 基于应力集中强度比的单裂隙岩石破坏过程研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 87-95.
[9] 张传庆 ,俞 缙,陈 珺,卢景景,周 辉,. 地下工程围岩潜在岩爆问题评估方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 341-349.
[10] 王卫东,吴江斌,王向军. 嵌岩桩嵌岩段侧阻和端阻综合系数研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 289-295.
[11] 王向军. 嵌岩桩承载变形特性的数值分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 585-591.
[12] 罗 勇 ,李春峰 ,邢皓枫,. 基于分布式光纤测试技术的大直径嵌岩桩承载性能研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1406-1412.
[13] 王铁行,刘 衡,杨 波. 厚层沉渣嵌岩桩承载性状研究[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 2072-2076.
[14] 张慧乐 ,马 凛 ,张智浩 ,孙映霞 . 岩溶区嵌岩桩承载特性影响因素试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 92-100.
[15] 王成虎 ,宋成科 ,刘立鹏 . 地下洞室围岩脆性破坏时的应力特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[3] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[4] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[5] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[6] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[7] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[8] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[9] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .
[10] 倪骁慧,朱珍德,赵 杰,李道伟,冯夏庭. 岩石破裂全程数字化细观损伤力学试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3283 -3290 .