岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2333-2341.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1669

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究

段君义1,杨果林1,胡敏1,邱明明2,俞昀1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 延安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 延安 716000
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-27 修回日期:2019-12-10 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:段君义,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事加筋土结构动力特性的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2019YFC1509800);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51678571,No. 51778641);中国铁路设计集团有限公司科技开发项目(No. 721630)

Experimental study on deformation characteristics of reinforced soil cushion subjected to loading and unloading

DUAN Jun-yi1, YANG Guo-lin1, HU Min1, QIU Ming-ming2, YU Yun1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an, Shaanxi 716000, China
  • Received:2019-09-27 Revised:2019-12-10 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Contact: 杨果林,男,1963年生,博士后,教授,博士生导师,主要从事加筋土路基静动力特性的研究。E-mail: yangguolin6301@163.com E-mail:junyidjy@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1509800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678571, 51778641) and the Science and Technology Development of China Railway Design Corporation (721630).

摘要: 加筋垫层由于具有诸多优点而被广泛应用于反复加卸载作用下公路、铁路路基等工程构筑物中。为研究加卸载作用下加筋垫层结构的变形特征,针对加筋与未加筋垫层2组模型,开展了单次加卸载静力试验。测试并获得了不同荷载作用下垫层竖向变形、筋材应变变化规律,对比分析了加筋与未加筋垫层的变形特征,并从能量角度对加筋垫层工作机制进行了探讨。结果表明:与未加筋情况相比,荷载作用下加筋垫层(加载板处)的沉降变形和残余变形更小。加筋后垫层表面(加载板范围外)的竖向变形及其受影响范围均增大,且在卸载过程中垫层表面竖向变形的水平分布曲线特征由“凹”型变为“凸”型,其加卸载曲线呈“∞”型。格宾网筋材应变沿横向呈现非均匀分布特点,其最大应变小于0.06%,筋材始终处于弹性变形状态。加筋垫层中筋材具有储存、释放及横向传递应变能效应,这使得加筋后垫层具有更好的承载能力与弹性性能,进而可降低循环加卸载作用下垫层的塑性变形或累计变形。

关键词: 加筋垫层, 格宾网筋材, 竖向变形, 筋材应变, 应变能

Abstract: Reinforced cushion has been widely used in engineering structures such as highways and railway subgrades subjected to repeated loading and unloading due to its many advantages. To study the deformation characteristics of reinforced cushion under loading and unloading, a single loading and unloading static test was carried out for the two models of gabion mesh reinforced and unreinforced cushions. Variations of vertical deformation of the cushion and reinforcement strain under different loads were monitored and obtained. The deformation characteristics of the reinforced and unreinforced cushions were compared and analyzed, and the working mechanism of the reinforced cushion was discussed in terms of energy. The results show that the settlement and residual deformations of the reinforced cushion (at the location of the loading plate) under loading are smaller than those without reinforcement. The vertical deformation of the surface of the cushion after reinforcement (outside the range of the loading plate) and its affected range have increased. The shape of the horizontal distribution curve of the vertical deformation during the unloading process changes from concave to convex, and its loading and unloading curve shows a shape of “∞”. The reinforcement strain shows a non-uniform distribution along the transverse direction, and the maximum strain is less than 0.06%. The reinforcements are always in an elastic deformation state. The reinforcement in the reinforced cushion has the effect of storing, releasing and laterally transmitting strain energy, which results in better bearing capacity and elastic property of the reinforced cushion, thereby reducing plastic deformation or cumulative deformation of the cushion under cyclic loading and unloading.

Key words: reinforced cushion, gabion mesh, vertical deformation, reinforcement strain, strain energy

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472
[1] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[2] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[3] 张 萍,杨春和,汪 虎,郭印同,徐 峰,侯振坤,. 页岩单轴压缩应力-应变特征及能量各向异性[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2106-2114.
[4] 黄俊杰,王 薇,苏 谦,李 婷,王 迅,. 素混凝土桩复合地基支承路堤变形破坏模式[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1653-1661.
[5] 谢学斌,李建坤,董宪久,田听雨,. 胶结充填体-顶板系统稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4183-4190.
[6] 郭建强,刘新荣,赵 青,. 岩石卸荷力学特性的理论研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 123-130.
[7] 王 蕉,楚锡华,姜清辉. 一个与弹性应变能相协调的脆性横观各向同性材料破坏准则[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2221-2226.
[8] 杜海民,马 巍,张淑娟,周志伟. 围压与含水率对冻结砂土破坏应变能密度影响特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1943-1950.
[9] 谢 璨,李树忱,平 洋,李景龙,李术才,. 峰后裂隙岩石非线性损伤特性与数值模拟研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2128-2136.
[10] 汪 泓,杨天鸿,刘洪磊,赵永川,邓文学,侯宪港,. 循环荷载下干燥与饱和砂岩力学特性及能量演化[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1600-1608.
[11] 郭建强 ,刘新荣 ,王军保 ,黄质宏,. 基于弹性应变能的岩石强度准则[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 129-136.
[12] 张传庆 ,俞 缙,陈 珺,卢景景,周 辉,. 地下工程围岩潜在岩爆问题评估方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 341-349.
[13] 杨建平,陈卫忠,杨典森,田洪铭,. 一种基于弹性应变能的裂隙岩体等效弹性模量评价方法[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2159-2164.
[14] 范 勇 ,卢文波 ,杨建华 ,严 鹏 ,陈 明 , . 深埋洞室开挖瞬态卸荷诱发振动的衰减规律[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 541-549.
[15] 曹国福,徐 兵,王茂胜,姚顺雨,刘 丽,刘益锋. 圈围工程中高强有纺土工布加筋垫层变形试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 238-244.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .
[3] 李鸿博,郭小红. 公路连拱隧道土压力荷载的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3429 -3434 .
[4] 贾剑青,王宏图,刘大鹏,安龙奇. 隧洞地表稳定性监测及计算分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3765 -3770 .
[5] 路军富,刘 立,王明年,李培楠. 多荷载作用下层状土路基的力学特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 76 -80 .
[6] 刘林超,杨 骁. 基于薄层法的饱和土桩纵向振动研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 92 -98 .
[7] 王光勇,顾金才,陈安敏,徐景茂,张向阳. 全长粘结式锚杆加固洞室抗爆性能试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 107 -112 .
[8] 木林隆,黄茂松,龚维明,殷永高. 水平荷载作用下根式基础受力特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 287 -292 .
[9] 曹雪山,殷宗泽. 非饱和土二维固结简化计算的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2575 -2580 .
[10] 许尚杰,尹小涛,党发宁. 晶体及矿物颗粒大小对岩土材料力学性质的影响[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2581 -2587 .