›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2106-2114.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1824

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

页岩单轴压缩应力-应变特征及能量各向异性

张 萍1,杨春和1, 2,汪 虎2,郭印同2,徐 峰2,侯振坤1   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-06 出版日期:2018-06-11 发布日期:2018-07-03
  • 作者简介:张萍,男,1987年生,硕士研究生,主要从事页岩气开采中岩石力学问题的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.51574218);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(No.XDB10040200)。

Stress-strain characteristics and anisotropy energy of shale under uniaxial compression

ZHANG Ping1, YANG Chun-he1, 2, WANG Hu2, GUO Yin-tong2, XU Feng2, HOU Zhen-kun1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2016-09-06 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574218) and the Financial Support of a Special Program of Chinese Academy of Science (XDB10040200).

摘要: 层理对页岩力学性质和应变能的积聚和耗散具有重要影响,以不同层理面角度下龙马溪组页岩为研究对象,开展电镜扫描试验和单轴压缩试验,研究起裂、扩容和峰值特征点的应力-应变、弹性模量和泊松比的各向异性特征,分析其页岩变形破坏过程中输入应变能、可释放弹性应变能和耗散应变能的变化规律,揭示输入应变能与层理面角度和抗压强度的关系。结果表明:龙马溪组页岩脆性矿物含量达到72.58%,微观结构各向异性明显;随层理面角度增加,起裂、扩容和峰值特征点的应力和应变都先减少后增大,在 30°时均达到一个最低值,总体上呈现两边高、中间低的U型变化规律;随层理面角度增加,起裂、扩容和峰值特征点的输入应变能、可释放弹性应变能和耗散应变能也先减少后增大,在 30°时均达到一个最低值;各特征点的应力、应变和应变能各向异性敏感性明显,0°≤ ≤30°和30°≤ ≤60°内各向异性的敏感性大于60°≤ ≤90°;起裂应力和扩容应力均与峰值应力呈线性相关,同时峰值应变能与抗压强度存在相应的二次非线性关系,这为页岩气钻井、储层压裂改造和井壁稳定性预测预警提供了根据和参考。

关键词: 页岩, 单轴压缩, 各向异性, 应力-应变, 应变能

Abstract: The bedding plane has an important effect on mechanical properties of shale and its accumulation and dissipation of strain energy. In this study, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests and uniaxial compression tests were carried out on Longmaxi Formation shale with different bedding plane angles. Then, this study investigated anisotropy characteristics of elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio and the stress-strain of initial cracking, critical dilatancy and peak characteristic points. The evolutions of input strain energy, releasable elastic strain energy and dissipated strain energy during the deformation and failure of shale were analysed, and the relationship among the input strain energy, bedding angles and compressive strength was revealed. The results showed that the brittle mineral content of Longmaxi Formation shale was found to be as high as 72.58%, and its microstructure was distinctly anisotropic. With the increase of bedding plane angle, the stress and strain of initial cracking, critical dilatancy and peak characteristic points were all decreased first and then increased. A minimum value was found at 30°, and the curves generally presented U-shape. With the bedding plane angle increasing, the input strain energy, releasable strain energy and dissipated strain energy of initial cracking, critical dilatancy and peak characteristic points were also decreased first and then increased, reaching a minimum value at 30°. Stress-strain and strain energy of each feature point showed significant anisotropy sensitivity, and the anisotropic sensitivities at 0°≤ ≤30°and 30°≤ ≤60°were greater than that at 60°≤ ≤90°. The peak stress had correlations linearly with both the initial cracking stress and critical dilatancy stress, while there was a corresponding quadratic nonlinear relationship between the input strain energy and compressive strength. This study provides references for shale gas drilling, reservoir fracturing and wellbore stability prediction and warning.

Key words: shale, uniaxial compression, anisotropy, stress-strain, strain energy

中图分类号: 

  • P 642

[1] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[2] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[3] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[6] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[7] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[8] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[9] 徐杰, 周建, 罗凌晖, 余良贵, . 高岭-蒙脱混合黏土渗透各向异性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
[10] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[11] 修乃岭, 严玉忠, 胥云, 王欣, 管保山, 王臻, 梁天成, 付海峰, 田国荣, 蒙传幼, . 基于非达西流动的自支撑剪切裂缝导流 能力实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 135-142.
[12] 范运辉, 朱其志, 倪涛, 张坤, 张振南, . 基于弹性张量离散化的脆延转变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 181-188.
[13] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[14] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[15] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!