不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1289

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3291-3299.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1289

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 下一篇

不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性

彭守建^{1, 2}，岳雨晴^{1, 2}，刘义鑫^{1, 2}，许江^{1, 2}

1. 重庆大学煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室，重庆 400044；2. 重庆大学复杂煤气层瓦斯抽采国家地方联合工程实验室，重庆 400044

收稿日期:2018-07-18 出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-03
作者简介:彭守建，男，1983年生，博士，副教授，主要从事矿山岩石力学、煤与瓦斯突出灾害动力学与控制等方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.51474040）；重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目（No.cstc2018jcyjA3145）；中央高校基本科研业务费（No.106112017CDJQJ248825）。

Anisotropic characteristics and shear mechanical properties of different genetic structural planes

PENG Shou-jian^{1, 2}, YUE Yu-qing^{1, 2}, LIU Yi-xin^{1, 2}, XU Jiang^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Methane Drainage in Complex Coal Gas Seam, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

Received:2018-07-18 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-03
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51474040), the Basic and Frontier Research Projects of Chongqing (cstc2018jcyjA3145) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (106112017CDJQJ248825).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 岩体结构面具有明显的各向异性，其直接影响岩体的变形特性、力学特性与渗流特性，因此对结构面的各向异性特征开展量化分析尤为重要。针对不同成因（劈裂、剪切）结构面，利用结构面量化参数（节理粗糙度系数JRC、节理平均倾角θ、分形维数DB）对其各向异性特征进行了分析，研究了各向异性特征对其剪切力学特性的影响。研究结果表明：（1）在劈裂断裂结构面中，平行劈裂方向的JRC与θ值普遍大于垂直方向，且随角度变化波动较小，DB在对角线方向变化较大，其值与所取剖面线长度有关；而在剪切断裂结构面中，平行剪切方向的JRC和θ值与垂直方向无明显差别，但DB同样在对角线方向变化较大；（2）在评价结构面各向异性时，采用θ、DB等参数评价时，劈裂断裂结构面与剪切断裂结构面各向异性系数无明显差别，采用JRC作为评价参数时，其各向异性系数差异较大，能较好反映不同结构面之间的差异特征；（3）剪切断裂结构面的峰值剪切荷载和法向位移均高于劈裂断裂结构面，两种结构面的剪胀角达到峰值时的剪切位移相近，剪切断裂结构面的开度分布较为集中且普遍较大，劈裂断裂结构面开度分布则较为分散。

关键词: 结构面, 劈裂, 剪切, 各向异性, 力学特性

Abstract: The structural plane of rock mass shows obvious anisotropy, which directly influences the deformation characteristics, mechanical properties and seepage characteristics of rock mass. It is significant to conduct the anisotropic quantitative analysis of the structure surface. In this paper, the anisotropy characteristics of different genetic structure planes are analyzed by the common structural surface quantization parameters (joint roughness coefficient JRC, the average joint angle θ, and fractal dimension DB), and their influences on the shear mechanical properties are also studied. The results show that in the tensile structure plane, the values of JRC and θ along the direction of splitting are larger than the values of these parameters perpendicular to the splitting direction and fluctuated slightly with the change of the angle. DB fluctuated largely in the diagonal direction, and its value is related to profile length. In shear structure plane, the values of JRC and θ parallel to the splitting direction have no significant differences from those perpendicular to the splitting direction. However, DB changes greatly in the diagonal direction. When θ and DB are used to evaluate the anisotropy of the structure plane, there is no obvious difference in anisotropy coefficients of splitting fracture plane and shear fracture plane. While, when JRC is used as evaluation parameter, the anisotropy coefficient is quite different, which could better reflect the different characteristics of different structural planes. The peak shear load and normal displacement of shear fracture plane are higher than those of splitting structure plane. The shear displacements of the two structural planes are similar when the dilation angle reached the peak value, and the aperture distribution of shear fracture structural plane is relatively concentrated and generally larger. The aperture distribution splitting fracture plane is more dispersed.

Key words: structure plane, splitting, shear, anisotropy, mechanical characteristics

中图分类号:

TU 452

彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.

PENG Shou-jian, YUE Yu-qing, LIU Yi-xin, XU Jiang, . Anisotropic characteristics and shear mechanical properties of different genetic structural planes[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈庆发, 杨承业, 尹庭昌, 王宇, . 金属矿山矿块单元结构体组合关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 74-82.
[2]	郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[3]	张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[4]	徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 林存刚, 梁荣柱, 冯苏阳, . 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧隧道的形变响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[5]	邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[6]	周跃峰, 杨哲, 饶锡保, 肖国强, 周黎明. 不同含水率下黏土弹性参数的弯曲−伸展元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 387-393.
[7]	许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[8]	白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[9]	蒋长宝, 魏财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[10]	梁珂, 陈国兴, 杭天柱, 刘抗, 何杨, . 砂类土最大动剪切模量的新预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[11]	洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[12]	刘海峰, 朱长歧, 汪稔, 王新志, 崔翔, 王天民, . 礁灰岩-混凝土界面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1540-1548.
[13]	侯钦宽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 徐敏娜, 曹泽敏. 结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1259-1269.
[14]	孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[15]	徐杰, 周建, 罗凌晖, 余良贵, . 高岭-蒙脱混合黏土渗透各向异性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性

Anisotropic characteristics and shear mechanical properties of different genetic structural planes

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0