岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 3066-3076.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1931

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑荷载方向效应的软硬相间层状岩体 综合变形模量取值研究

周洪福1, 2,刘彬3   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心,四川 成都 610081;2. 山东科技大学 地球科学与工程学院,山东 青岛 266590; 3. 四川省地质调查院,四川 成都 610081
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-13 修回日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-21
  • 作者简介:周洪福,男,1980年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,硕士研究生导师,主要从事工程地质与地质灾害调查研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究资助(No.2019QZKK0904);四川省重点研发项目(No.2020YFS0296);中国地质调查局项目(No.20160272,No.20190505)。

Parameter research for hard and soft layered rock mass of the integrated deformation modulus under practice building load

ZHOU Hong-fu1, 2, LIU Bin3   

  1. 1. Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China; 2. College of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. Sichuan Geological Survey, Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China
  • Received:2019-11-13 Revised:2020-04-22 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program(STEP) (2019QZKK0904) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2020YFS0296) and China Geological Survey Projects(20160272, 20190505).

摘要: 基于整体受力特征,提出用综合变形模量来表征多层层状岩体的整体变形效应。通过工程实例,建立体现各项异性特性的软硬相间层状岩体综合变形模量理论模型。采用弹性力学分别推求受力方向平行、垂直以及与层面呈任意角度情况下多层层状岩体综合变形模量理论解,并检验理论解一致性。推导受力方向平行层面的综合泊松比理论解和受垂直层面剪应力作用的综合剪切模量理论解。室内分别建立层面倾角为0o、30o、60o、90o的软硬相间层状岩体地质模型,试验获得其综合变形模量。对比分析试验值和理论计算值,两者差别在4.20%~8.77%之间,验证理论解的正确性。从理论分析和试验角度,研究工程荷载方向效应对层状岩体变形特性的影响,丰富完善现有层状岩体力学参数研究理论和技术方法。

关键词: 层状岩体, 荷载方向效应, 理论模型, 综合变形模量

Abstract: Based on the overall loading characteristics, this study was to propose an integrated deformation modulus for representing the integrated loading and deformation effect of the layered rock mass. The analysis of engineering cases was conducted to establish a theoretical model, which reflected the anisotropic characteristics of the integrated deformation modulus of the hard and soft layered rock mass. The theoretical solutions of integrated deformation modulus of hard and soft layered rock mass were separately deduced by using the plastic mechanics under the parallel, vertical and arbitrary directions of the stress to the bedding planes. The consistency of the theoretical solutions was also verified. We deduced the theoretical description of the integrated Poisson's ratio of the parallel direction of stress to bedding planes and the integrated shear modulus of the vertical direction of shear stress to bedding planes. The integrated deformation modulus was obtained by the geological model testing the hard and soft layered rock mass of the dip angles at 0o, 30o, 60o and 90o. The differences in the results from the laboratory test and the integrated deformation modulus were from 4.20 to 8.77%; therefore, the theoretical equation achieved great effects. This research studied the influence of engineering load direction on the deformation properties of layered rock mass by using theoretical analysis and laboratory tests, and improved the theory and technical methods for studying the mechanical parameters of the existing layered rock mass.

Key words: layered rock mass, practice building load, theoretical model, integrated deformation modulus

中图分类号: 

  • TU452
[1] 王旭一, 黄书岭, 丁秀丽, 周火明. 层状岩体单轴压缩力学特性的 非均质层面影响效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 581-592.
[2] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[3] 王立业, 周凤玺, 秦虎, . 饱和盐渍土分数阶蠕变模型及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 543-551.
[4] 鲁海峰, 孟祥帅, 颜伟, 姚多喜, . 采煤工作面层状结构底板采动稳定及 破坏深度的圆弧滑动解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 166-174.
[5] 胡中华,徐奴文,戴 峰,顾功开,李 昂,杨 莹,. 乌东德水电站地下厂房层状岩体稳定性及变形机制[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3794-3802.
[6] 邓华锋,张小景,张恒宾,王晨玺杰,方景成,肖 瑶. 巴西劈裂法在层状岩体抗拉强度测试中的分析与讨论[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 309-315.
[7] 韩昌瑞 ,白世伟 ,王玉朋 ,张东焕,. 层状岩体深埋长隧道锚杆支护优化设计[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 409-414.
[8] 张玉军 ,张维庆,. 不同的层状岩体抗剪强度表达式计算效果的有限元分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 359-364.
[9] 单仁亮,宋立伟,李东阳,黄宝龙,刘 念,赵文峰. 冻结红砂岩非线性蠕变模型的研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1541-1546.
[10] 左双英,叶明亮,唐晓玲,续建科,史文兵. 层状岩体地下洞室破坏模式数值模型及验证[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 458-465.
[11] 张敦福 ,王相玉 ,朱家明 ,李术才 ,朱维申 . 偶应力对层状岩体结构面边界层效应的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2181-2188.
[12] 史 玲 ,蔡美峰. 岩石节理在固定法向压力刚度条件下的剪切理论研究[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 739-744.
[13] 张桂民 ,李银平 ,施锡林 ,杨春和 ,王李娟. 一种交互层状岩体模型材料制备方法及初步试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 284-289.
[14] 刘自由,江学良,左文贵. 三维应力作用下岩体层面效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2835-2839.
[15] 李晓红,夏彬伟,李 丹,韩昌瑞. 深埋隧道层状围岩变形特征分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1163-1167.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[2] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[3] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[4] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[5] 陈中学,汪 稔,胡明鉴,魏厚振,王新志. 云南东川蒋家沟泥石流形成内因初探[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3053 -3056 .
[6] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[7] 赵明华,刘小平,黄立葵. 降雨作用下路基裂隙渗流分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3122 -3126 .
[8] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[9] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[10] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .