岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1133-1140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0663

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩体体积节理数表征岩体完整系数的结构面 类别修正研究

殷明伦1, 2,张晋勋1,江玉生2,江华2,商晓旭3   

  1. 1. 北京城建集团博士后工作站,北京 100088;2. 中国矿业大学(北京)力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083; 3. 中兵勘察设计研究院有限公司,北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-25 修回日期:2020-11-14 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-26
  • 作者简介:殷明伦,男,1990年生,博士,博士后,主要从事城市地下工程和隧道工程方面的研究

Study of correction of the structural plane category based on the rock mass integrity coefficient characterized by the volumetric joint count

YIN Ming-lun1, 2, ZHANG Jin-xun1, JIANG Yu-sheng2, JIANG Hua2, SHANG Xiao-xu3   

  1. 1. Postdoctoral Program, Beijing Urban Construction Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. China Ordnance Industry Survey and Geotechnical Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2020-05-25 Revised:2020-11-14 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-26

摘要: 岩体完整性是评价工程岩体稳定性的重要指标之一。众多研究结果表明,岩体完整性系数Kv能比较全面地体现岩体的完整性,但其测试难度高,且不利于现场测试工作的频繁开展,需要一种更易于测量的指标。基于文献调研及大量工程实测数据,通过研究岩体体积节理数Jv与岩体完整系数Kv的关系,提出了考虑结构面类别的Jv表征Kv的修正方法。修正方法中将结构面划分为5类,明确了结构面性状定性、定量划分依据,并依据实测数据确定了结构面修正系数Jp的取值方法。对比实际工程中的实测Kv值、国标推荐换算得到的Kv值、线性拟合得到的Kv值、修正换算方法得到的Kv值,结果表明,采用修正方法得到的Kv值与实测Kv值的拟合优度更高,绝对残差较国标推荐算法和线性拟合换算结果分别减少了58%和32%,换算准确度更高。这证明了研究提出的岩体体积节理数表征岩体完整系数的结构面类别修正方法在工程应用上是可行的,可以在后续工程中推广使用。

关键词: 岩体质量评价, 岩体完整性系数, 岩体体积节理数, 结构面类别划分, 结构面类别修正

Abstract: The integrity coefficient of rock mass is one of the important indice to evaluate the stability of engineering rock mass. Extensive research results show that the integrity coefficient Kv can comprehensively represent the integrity of rock mass. However, this parameter is difficult to obtain in frequent field tests. Therefore, a new integrity coefficient that can be easily obtained to represent the rock mass integrity is needed. Based on the literature review and a large number of engineering in situ data, this paper first studies the relationship between the volumetric joint count (Jv) and the integrity coefficient (Kv) of rock mass. A correction method of Jv representing Kv is then put forward considering the type of structural plane. The structural plane is divided into five categories according to the qualitative and quantitative properties of the structural plane. Moreover, the correction coefficient of structural plane, Jp, is determined based on the measured data. Comparing the Kv measured in the practical engineering, the Kv conversed from the international recommended standard value, the Kv conversed by the linear fitting, and the Kv conversed by the proposed correction method, it shows that the goodness-of-fit of the Kv conversed by the correction method and the measured Kv is the highest. The absolute residual reduce 58% and 32% compared to national recommended standard value and the linear fitting conversion, indicating that the conversion accuracy is higher. It is proved that the correction of the structural plane is feasible and exhibits promising application prospect in engineerings.

Key words: rock mass quality evaluation, rock integrity coefficient, volumetric joint count, classification of structural plane, correction of structural plane

中图分类号: 

  • U 45
[1] 丁振杰, 郑俊, 吕庆, 邓建辉, 童孟胜, . 《工程岩体分级标准》中边坡工程岩体质量 指标计算方法的讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 275-280.
[2] 雷光伟,杨春和,王贵宾,魏 翔,陈世万,霍 亮,. 基于结构面综合指标的岩体质量评价及应用[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2343-2350.
[3] 唐 海,万 文,刘金海. 基于未确知测度理论的地下洞室岩体质量评价[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1181-1185.
[4] 贾明涛,王李管. 基于区域化变量及RMR评价体系的金川III矿区矿岩质量评价[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1907-1912.
[5] 梁桂兰,徐卫亚,谈小龙. 基于熵权的可拓理论在岩体质量评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 535-540.
[6] 王瑞红 ,李建林 ,蒋昱州 ,王乐华 ,李红心 . 考虑岩体开挖卸荷边坡岩体质量评价[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2741-2746.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 奎,高 波. 地铁隧道下穿小河和桥梁的施工方案研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1509 -1516 .
[2] 杨 冰,杨 军,常 在,甘厚义,宋二祥. 土石混合体压缩性的三维颗粒力学研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1645 -1650 .
[3] 肖世国,鲜 飞,王唤龙. 一种微型桩组合抗滑结构内力分析方法[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2553 -2559 .
[4] 叶海林,郑颖人,黄润秋,杜修力,李安洪,许江波. 强度折减动力分析法在滑坡抗滑桩抗震设计中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 317 -323 .
[5] 吕玺琳,黄茂松,钱建固. 真三维状态下土体强度及变形分叉影响[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 21 -26 .
[6] 曹 平,张 科,汪亦显,林 杭. 多层边坡破坏机制数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 872 -878 .
[7] 刘功勋 ,栾茂田 ,唐小微 ,邵 琪 ,张俊峰. 复杂应力条件下原状饱和海洋黏土残余变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 1931 -1938 .
[8] 吴礼舟 ,张利民 ,黄润秋. 成层非饱和土渗流的耦合解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2391 -2396 .
[9] 刘 润 ,王秀妍 ,刘月辉 ,王武刚. 点支撑缺陷下海底埋管热屈曲分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 64 -69 .
[10] 胡安峰 ,陈博浪 ,应宏伟. 土体本构模型对强度折减法分析基坑整体稳定性的影响[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 592 -597 .