岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1395-1403.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1402

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑局部含水率效应的浅层土体开裂 过程与力学机制分析

汪时机1, 2,骆赵刚1,李贤1,文桃2   

  1. 1. 西南大学 工程技术学院, 重庆 400715;2. 长江师范学院 重庆市建筑物全生命周期健康检测与灾害防治工程研究中心,重庆 408100
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-16 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 骆赵刚,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土体裂隙量化表征方面的研究。E-mail: lzg319818@email.swu.edu.cn E-mail:shjwang@swu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:汪时机,男,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学方面的研究与教学工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 11972311,No. 11572262);中央高校基本业务费专项资金(No. XDJK2018AB003)

Analysis of cracking process and mechanical mechanism of shallow soil due to local water content change

WANG Shi-ji1, 2, LUO Zhao-gang1, LI Xian1, WEN Tao2   

  1. 1. College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Structure Full-Life-Cycle Health Detection and Disaster Prevention, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China
  • Received:2020-09-16 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11972311, 11572262) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2018AB003).

摘要: 裂隙的产生和发育会极大地影响土体的强度、变形和渗透特性,进而引发各种工程灾害。为了进一步探究土体开裂过程和裂隙的发育规律,试验对土体开裂前、开裂初期以及开裂中后期的局部含水率进行测试。结合土体随含水率变化的横向收缩特征,分析裂隙过程的力学机制,建立适用于浅层土体开裂全过程的定量化计算和判别公式。研究发现:土体在开裂前后的竖向含水率分布随着土体深度的增加而逐渐线性递增,其累计横向收缩率随含水率的下降而逐渐增大;通过浅层土体的表层含水率和土体深度,可以推导出适用于浅层土体的抗拉强度和张拉应力表达式,进而对浅层土体开裂的3个典型阶段进行定量化描述;在裂隙发育的初期,新裂隙的产生会导致土体张拉应力降低,将裂隙总长度、平均宽度、裂隙度等基本指标与张拉应力建立联系,能够清晰地对开裂初期的复杂变化过程进行解释和描述。此外,结合土体的初始缺陷、裂隙边缘的应力集中等特征,对裂隙发育过程进行了深入地分析讨论。

关键词: 浅层土体, 局部含水率, 裂隙发育, 受力特征, 定量分析

Abstract: The initiation and propagation of cracks will greatly affect the strength, deformation and permeability of soil, and then lead to various engineering disasters. In order to further explore the crack initiation and propagation mechanism of soil, the local water contents in three stages were measured. Besides, the lateral shrinkage characteristics of soil were also tested with the change of water content. The mechanical mechanism of the cracking process was analyzed, and the quantitative calculation and discriminant formulas for the whole cracking process of shallow soil were established. The results show that the vertical water content distribution increases linearly with the increase of soil depth during the first two cracking stages, and the cumulative horizontal shrinkage increases with the decrease of water content. Based on the surface water content and depth of shallow soil, the mathematical expressions of tensile strength and tensile stress for shallow soil can be deduced, and then the three typical cracking stages of shallow soil can be analyzed. At the early stage of cracking, the generation of new cracks leads to the decrease of tensile stress on the soil surface. The basic indicators such as total crack length, and the average width and degree of cracks, are related to tensile stress. The correlations between tensile stress and crack indicators could explain and describe the complex change process clearly in the initial stage of cracking. Moreover, combined with the initial defects of soil and the stress concentration at the crack edge, the cracking process was further analyzed and discussed.

Key words: shallow soil, local water content, cracking evolution, mechanics characteristic, quantitative analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[2] 蔡正银, 朱 洵, 黄英豪, 张 晨. 冻融过程对膨胀土裂隙演化特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4555-4563.
[3] 胡东旭,李 贤,周超云,薛 乐,刘洪伏,汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[4] 李学丰,何玉琪,刘金锋,何维刚,. 砂土正交组构幅值参量的定量分析[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3619-3626.
[5] 陈 结,刘剑兴 ,姜德义 ,范金洋 ,任 松,. 围压作用下盐岩应变与损伤恢复试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 105-112.
[6] 沙 鹏 ,伍法权 ,李 响 ,梁 宁 ,常金源,. 高地应力条件下层状地层隧道围岩挤压变形与支护受力特征[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1407-1414.
[7] 张俊儒 ,孙克国 ,卢 锋 ,郑宗溪 ,孙其清,. 不等跨连拱铁路隧道围岩压力分布及受力特征模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3077-3084.
[8] 詹红志,王亮清,王昌硕,张 楠. 考虑滑床不同地基系数的抗滑桩受力特征研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 250-256.
[9] 陈从新,刘秀敏,刘才华. 数字图像技术在岩石细观力学研究中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 53-61.
[10] 杨 慧,曹 平,江学良. 水-岩化学作用等效裂纹扩展细观力学模型[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2104-2110.
[11] 孙 秋 ,胡 昕 ,闵紫超 ,洪宝宁,. 单轴压缩条件下水泥土细观结构的试验研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 529-533.
[12] 周宇泉,洪宝宁. 粘性土压缩过程中的微细结构变化试验研究[J]. , 2005, 26(S1): 82-85.
[13] 谭罗荣. 葛洲坝泥化夹层的物质组成特性[J]. , 1984, 5(2): 27-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 雷金波,陈从新. 基于双曲线模型的带帽刚性桩复合地基荷载传递机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[6] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[7] 樊恒辉,高建恩,吴普特,娄宗科. 水泥基土壤固化剂固化土的物理化学作用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3741 -3745 .
[8] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[9] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[10] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .