›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 318-324.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2458

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析

胡东旭,李 贤,周超云,薛 乐,刘洪伏,汪时机   

  1. 西南大学 工程技术学院,重庆 400715
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-07 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 汪时机,男,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学方面的教学和研究。E-mail: shjwang@swu.edu.cn E-mail:742394258@qq.com
  • 作者简介:胡东旭,男,1991年生,硕士研究生,主要从事非饱和土理论方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 11572262);中央高校基本科研业务费项资金(No. XDJK2018AB003)

Quantitative analysis of swelling and shrinkage cracks in expansive soil

HU Dong-xu, LI Xian , ZHOU Chao-yun, XUE Le, LIU Hong-fu, WANG Shi-ji   

  1. College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China
  • Received:2017-12-07 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China(11572262) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2018AB003).

摘要: 为研究膨胀土在降雨与蒸发过程中的胀缩裂隙演化规律,对原状膨胀土进行干湿循环的CT扫描试验。利用Matlab软件编写程序对土体CT图进行三维体重建以及裂隙信息的提取,从定性与定量的维度研究土体三维空间裂隙与干湿循环之间的关系。定性研究发现,裂隙发育开始于土体内部初始孔洞与微纹裂等薄弱处,并扩展延伸,形成裂隙面、裂隙体,最后形成复杂的三维裂隙网络;随着干湿循环的进行,裂隙面积和体积逐渐增加,最后趋于稳定。定量研究发现,裂隙面积沿试样轴向的分布具有明显的周期性规律,随着干湿循环的进行,周期逐渐减小,振幅A先增加后减小;裂隙开展分为3个阶段,即裂隙酝酿期、裂隙快速发育期和裂隙平稳发展期,而裂隙发育主要发生在裂隙快速发育期。得出了试样径向裂隙面积、轴向高度与累计干缩体变之间的近似关系,以裂隙体积定义了符合Logistic函数变化规律的扰动函数,可以预测裂隙在试样局部的发展及分布情况,为裂隙膨胀土的渗透特性以及整体与局部的应力、应变研究提供参考。

关键词: 膨胀土, 干湿循环, 裂隙, 定量分析

Abstract: To study swell-shrink fissure evolution rule of expansive soil in the natural rainfall and evaporation process, wetting-drying cycles tests, and CT scanning tests have been done. The three-dimensional reconstruction of soil CT images and the extraction of fracture information are carried out using Matlab software. The relationship between three-dimensional space cracks and wetting and drying cycles is studied from qualitative and quantitative dimensions. The relationship between soil’s fracture in three dimensional space and d wetting-drying cycles are studied from the qualitative and quantitative dimensions. Qualitative studies have found that the development of fractures begins at the weak spots such as initial pores and microcracks within the soil; and thus extends to form fracture surfaces and fissure bodies; and finally forms a complex three-dimensional fracture network. As the wetting-drying cycles progresses, the area and volume of the fracture gradually increase; and finally tend to stability. Quantitative studies have found that the distribution of fracture area along the axial direction of the sample has obvious periodicity. As the wetting-drying cycle proceeds, the period gradually decreases, and the amplitude A increases first and then decreases. The development of fissure is divided into three stages: i.e, fissure gestation period, fissure rapid development period and fissure steady development period; and fissure development mainly occurs during fissure development period. The approximate relationship between radial fracture area, axial height, and cumulative dry shrinkage volume change is obtained. The fracture volume is defined as a function of the Logistic function. It can predict the development and distribution of fissures in the sample, and can provide references for the permeability characteristics of fissured expansive soil and the study of the overall and local stress and strain.

Key words: expansive soil, wetting-drying cycle, fissure, quantitative analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[3] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[4] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[5] 高雪峰, 张延军, 黄奕斌, 赵熠, 倪金, 马静晨. 花岗岩粗糙单裂隙对流换热特性的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1761-1769.
[6] 夏才初, 王岳嵩, 郑金龙, 吕志涛. 裂隙岩体不均匀冻胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1161-1168.
[7] 侯晓萍, 陈胜宏. 采用复合单元法模拟裂隙多孔介质变饱和流动[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1437-1446.
[8] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[9] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
[10] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[11] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[12] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[13] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[14] 肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[15] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!