岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2313-2323.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1507

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析

骆赵刚1,汪时机1, 2,杨振北1   

  1. 1. 西南大学 工程技术学院,重庆 400715;2. 长江师范学院 土木建筑工程学院,重庆 408100
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:骆赵刚,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土体裂隙量化表征方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.11572262,No.11972311);中央高校基本业务费专项资金(No.XDJK2018AB003)。

Quantitative analysis of fracture evolution of expansive soils under wetting-drying cycles

LUO Zhao-gang1, WANG Shi-ji1, 2, YANG Zhen-bei1   

  1. 1. College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China
  • Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Contact: 汪时机,男,1977年生,博士,教授/博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学方面的研究与教学。E-mail: shjwang@swu.edu.cn E-mail:1769897044@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572262, 11972311) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2018AB003).

摘要: 膨胀土是一种分布广泛且具有明显胀缩性的裂隙土,其裂纹萌生及裂隙扩展会受到诸多因素的影响。此试验利用基于MATLAB开发的图像处理与裂隙定量分析程序,研究了膨胀土裂隙开展的尺寸和温度效应。制备25个不同初始状态的膨胀土泥浆试样,利用拍照台对其失水收缩过程中试样表面裂隙演化过程以及对应含水率进行记录。运用裂隙定量分析程序,分别对两类效应单独作用、耦合作用下的膨胀土裂隙度 、长径比C、裂隙平均宽度 、分形维数值等指标进行定量化分析发现:膨胀土裂隙的分形维数值具有较好的稳定性,其指标仅受试样厚度轻微影响,分形维数与含水率ω的关系呈近似对数曲线;在失水收缩过程中膨胀土最终裂隙指标主要受到试样厚度的影响,表面尺寸对裂隙长径比、宽度最终值也有一定影响,温度影响主要体现在促使裂隙更早、更快的发育并稳定,对最终指标影响相对不明显,影响显著性顺序为:厚度>表面尺寸>温度;此外还对膨胀土失水收缩开裂过程机制进行分析,进一步研究膨胀土的裂隙发育以及两类效应对其裂隙扩展的影响规律。

关键词: 膨胀土, 裂隙, 尺寸效应, 温度效应, 定量表征

Abstract: Expansive soil is a widely distributed soil with obvious dilatancy, shrinkage and crack-rich properties. Its crack initiation and propagation are affected by many factors. In this study, the image processing and crack quantitative analysis program developed by MATLAB were used to explore the size and temperature effects of the crack evolution of expansive soil samples. Firstly, twenty-five expansive soil mud samples with different initial states were prepared. Then, the evolution of cracks on the surface and the corresponding water content of the samples during the shrinkage due to water loss were recorded using a designed camera system. Finally, using crack quantitative analysis program, some indexes including fracture degree, aspect ratio, average crack width and fractal dimension, were quantitatively analyzed under the size effect or temperature effect, and the size-temperature combined action, respectively. It is shown that the fractal dimension value of the crack remains stable, and is only slightly affected by the thickness of the samples. But there exists an approximate logarithmic relationship between the fractal dimension and the moisture content. In the process of water loss and shrinkage, the final fracture index of the expansive soil was mainly affected by the thickness of the sample, and the surface size also had a certain impact on the final value of the fracture length to diameter ratio and width. Temperature accelerates fracture development and stability. However, the impact of average width value and temperature on the final index was not obvious. The thickness was the most significant factor, followed by the surface size, and finally temperature. Additionally, the microcosmic mechanism of shrinkage and cracking process of expansive soil were also analyzed according to this experiment.

Key words: expansive soil, fracture, size effect, temperature effect, quantitative characterization

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 孙壮壮, 马刚, 周伟, 王一涵, 陈远, 肖海斌. 颗粒形状对堆石颗粒破碎强度尺寸效应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 430-438.
[2] 薛松, 杨志兵, 李东奇, 陈益峰. 滴状流条件下非饱和交叉裂隙分流机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 59-67.
[3] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[4] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[5] 李福秀, 吴志坚, 严武建, 赵多银, . 基于振动台试验的黄土塬边斜坡 动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2880-2890.
[6] 孟敏强, 王磊, 蒋翔, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 基于尺寸效应的粗粒土单颗粒破碎试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2953-2962.
[7] 张科, 齐飞飞, 陈宇龙, . 基于3D打印和DIC技术的裂隙网络模型 变形破裂特征及填充物影响效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2555-2563.
[8] 罗易, 张家铭, 周峙, 契霍特金, 米敏, 沈筠, . 降雨-蒸发条件下土体开裂临界 含水率演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2592-2600.
[9] 商拥辉, 徐林荣, 蔡雨, . 浸水环境下重载铁路改良土路基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2739-2745.
[10] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[11] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[12] 高雪峰, 张延军, 黄奕斌, 赵熠, 倪金, 马静晨. 花岗岩粗糙单裂隙对流换热特性的数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1761-1769.
[13] 夏才初, 王岳嵩, 郑金龙, 吕志涛. 裂隙岩体不均匀冻胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1161-1168.
[14] 侯晓萍, 陈胜宏. 采用复合单元法模拟裂隙多孔介质变饱和流动[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1437-1446.
[15] 田威, 王震, 张丽, 余宸, . 高温作用后3D打印岩体试样力学性能初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 961-969.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 张 凯,周 辉,冯夏庭,房敬年,张元刚. Biot固结理论中连续性方程形式的讨论[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3273 -3277 .
[3] 孔位学,芮勇勤,董宝弟. 岩土材料在非关联流动法则下剪胀角选取探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3278 -3282 .
[4] 刘 晓,唐辉明,刘 瑜. 基于集对分析和模糊马尔可夫链的滑坡变形预测新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3399 -3405 .
[5] 蔚立元,李术才,徐帮树. 舟山灌门水道海底隧道钻爆法施工稳定性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3453 -3459 .
[6] 兰四清,王玉林,谢康和. 径向双侧壁排水软土地基固结数学模型及解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3871 -3875 .
[7] 张莎莎,谢永利,杨晓华,戴志仁. 典型天然粗粒盐渍土盐胀微观机制分析[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 123 -127 .
[8] 齐吉琳,马 巍. 冻土的力学性质及研究现状[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 133 -143 .
[9] 张福海,王保田,刘汉龙. 压实膨胀土路基的膨胀变形规律研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 206 -210 .
[10] 姚仰平,冯 兴,黄 祥,李春亮. UH模型在有限元分析中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 237 -245 .