岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 819-830.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0479

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于广义张−朱强度准则的深埋隧道 围岩塑性分析及应用探讨

王永红1,杜文1,张国辉2,宋扬2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044;2. 中铁十九局集团第五工程有限公司,辽宁 大连 116100
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-27 修回日期:2022-02-05 出版日期:2022-03-22 发布日期:2022-03-23
  • 作者简介:王永红,男,1958年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程的科研、教学和工程开发工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51478037);中国工程院重大咨询项目(No.TM201503)

An elasto-plastic analysis of a deep buried tunnel in rock mass based on generalized Zhang-Zhu strength criterion and preliminary application

WANG Yong-hong1, DU Wen1, ZHANG Guo-hui2, SONG Yang2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of the Education Ministry, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. The 5th Engineering Corporation, China Railway 19th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Dalian, Liaoning 116100, China
  • Received:2021-11-27 Revised:2022-02-05 Online:2022-03-22 Published:2022-03-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51478037) and the Key Consultant Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (TM201503).

摘要: 深埋隧道是交通建设中关键性和控制性的工程,近几年得到了迅速和蓬勃的发展。目前,深埋隧道围岩塑性分析,多采用Hoek-Brown强度准则,该准则只考虑了最大、最小主应力对围岩屈服的影响,与深埋隧道围岩三向受力的特征不符。根据Lee和Pietruszczak提出的递推计算方法,对围岩服从广义张?朱(generalized Zhang-Zhu strength criterion,简称GZZ)强度准则时的变形及周边应力分布进行了研究。发现当采用GZZ强度准则时,深埋隧洞洞壁位移、塑性半径明显减小,塑性区径向应力、环向应力均增大;中主应力系数增大,隧洞周边应力进一步提高。上述解法与引入面外应力解法相比,洞壁位移减小了26.6%,但塑性半径相差不大。应用GZZ强度准则计算了建平隧道围岩变形控制值,解决对深埋隧道围岩变形控制值认识模糊和无法有效判定的问题;继而改进开挖方案,有效提高了Ⅳ、Ⅴ围岩的掘进速度,实现了建平隧道安全快速的施工,获得了良好的工程效果。

关键词: 深埋隧道, GZZ强度准则, 应变软化围岩, 安全快速施工

Abstract: The deep buried tunnels are the fundamental and dominating projects in the implementation of transportation routes, they have been developing rapidly and vigorously in the last decade. At present, the failure criterion of rock mass adopted in the elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening is the Hoek–Brown strength criterion, in which only the maximum and minimum principal stress are considered. Obviously, the Hoek-Brown strength criterion is not compatible with the rock mass of a deep buried tunnel which bears high-level three-dimensional geostresses. On the basis of numerical procedure proposed by Lee and Pietruszczak, the deformation and stresses considering the generalized Zhang-Zhu strength criterion(GZZ) of rock mass around a circular opening are analyzed in this paper. It is found that the tunnel wall displacement and plastic radius are reduced, and both of the radical stress and hoop stress in the plastic zone are increased. It is also proved that a greater intermediate principal stress coefficient leads to higher stresses. Compared to another approach, theoretical solutions considering the effect of out-of-plane stress, the tunnel wall displacement calculated by GZZ strength criterion is reduced by 26.6% and the plastic radii are approximately the same. Finally, the GZZ strength criterion is applied as a practical approach to estimate the critical tunnel wall displacements of Jianping tunnel, then the triple bench cut method is modified to improve the advance rates of type Ⅳ and type Ⅴ rock mass, the safe and efficient cut of Jianping tunnel is achieved with outstanding engineering performance.

Key words: deep buried tunnels, GZZ strength criterion, strain-softening rock mass, safe and efficient cut

中图分类号: 

  • TU451
[1] 陈有亮, 刘耕云, 杜曦, RAFIG Azzam, 吴东鹏, . 考虑膨胀应力和剪胀的深埋隧道弹塑性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2525-2535.
[2] 李桐, 冯夏庭, 王睿, 肖亚勋, 王勇, 丰光亮, 姚志宾, 牛文静, . 深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[3] 刘成禹,何满潮,. 深埋隧道地质构造发育段围岩压力的特点[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1101-1109.
[4] 陈 浩 ,任伟中 ,舒中根 ,李 丹 . 不同支护条件下锚杆支护作用的模型试验研究与数值分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 277-282.
[5] 陈智强,张永兴,周检英. 基于数字散斑技术的深埋隧道围岩岩爆倾向相似材料试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 141-148.
[6] 陈 浩 ,任伟中 ,李 丹 ,夏彬伟. 深埋隧道锚杆支护作用的数值模拟与模型试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 719-0724.
[7] 王长柏,李海波,周青春,夏 祥. P波作用下深埋隧道动应力集中问题参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 775-780.
[8] 李晓红,夏彬伟,李 丹,韩昌瑞. 深埋隧道层状围岩变形特征分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1163-1167.
[9] 吴益平 ,李亚伟 . 灰色-进化神经网络模型在深埋隧道围岩变形预测中的应用[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 263-266.
[10] 赵 瑜 ,李晓红 ,卢义玉 ,康 勇 ,陈陆望 . 深埋隧道围岩系统卸荷演化过程的 Lyapunov指数分析[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2871-2876.
[11] 李晓红 ,靳晓光 ,王宏图 ,姜德义,. 采动下卧煤层对深埋隧道结构稳定性的影响[J]. , 2005, 26(9): 1448-1451.
[12] 靳晓光 ,李晓红 ,杨春和 ,张宪鑫,. 深埋隧道围岩-支护结构稳定性研究[J]. , 2005, 26(9): 1473-1476.
[13] 贾剑青 ,王宏图 ,李晓红 ,胡国忠 ,李开学 ,庞 成 , . 深埋隧道软硬交替复合顶板岩体变形破坏分析[J]. , 2005, 26(6): 937-940.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .