岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 144-154.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0565

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于物化特性的煤层注水难易程度模型

王刚1, 2, 3,冯净1, 2,陈雪畅1, 2,闫松1, 2,李胜鹏1, 2   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590; 2. 山东科技大学 安全与环境工程学院,山东 青岛 266590;3. 山东科技大学 能源与矿业工程学院,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 修回日期:2021-06-04 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 作者简介:王刚,男,1984年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事煤体微观渗流、增透及瓦斯防治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51934004,No.51974176);泰山学者专项经费资助(No.TS20190935);山东省杰出青年自然科学基金重点项目(No.ZR2020JQ22)

Model of difficulty degree of coal seam water injection based on physical and chemical characteristics

WANG Gang1, 2, 3, FENG Jing1, 2, CHEN Xue-chang1, 2, YAN Song1, 2, LI Sheng-peng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Teclnonogy, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. School of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. School of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Revised:2021-06-04 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51934004, 51974176), Taishan Scholar Project Special Foundation (TS20190935) and the Key Project of Shandong Outstanding Youth Natural Science Fund(ZR2020JQ22).

摘要: 增强煤层注水能力是目前需要亟待解决的问题,而煤层注水难易程度缺乏准确的判别标准。通过考虑煤体孔裂隙渗流分形结构特征和毛细作用下化学润湿特性,建立了煤层注水渗流量模型;基于概率论与数理统计方法基础,构建了集对联系度区间评价体系,划分了煤层注水的难易程度。结果显示:(1)注水效果受孔隙率、孔隙半径、接触角、液体的密度、表面张力、黏滞性系数、重力加速度等渗流结构参数和化学润湿特性等最简参数的影响,体系模型表征了煤体渗流结构和化学润湿特性与渗流量的关系。(2)在组合赋权下,孔隙率权重为0.32,对注水效果贡献较大,最大孔喉半径和接触角的贡献度次之;最小孔喉半径权重为0.17,对注水效果影响最小。(3)煤样X1、X2、X5评价指标值介于(0,0.25),属于难注水煤层;煤样X3、X4评价指标值介于(0.25,0.50),属于较难注水煤层。

关键词: 煤层注水, 物化特性, 难易程度, 评价模型

Abstract: Enhancing coal seam water injection capacity is an urgent problem to be solved, and the difficulty of coal seam water injection lacks accurate criteria. By considering the characteristics of the seepage fractal structure of the pores and cracks of the coal and the chemical wetting characteristics under capillary action, a model of the seepage flow of coal seam water injection is established. Based on the methods of probability theory and mathematical statistics, a set-pair connection degree interval evaluation system is constructed, and the difficulty of water injection into the coal seam is divided. The results show that: 1) The effect of water injection is affected by the simplest parameters such as porosity, pore radius, contact angle, liquid density, surface tension, viscosity coefficient, gravitational acceleration and other seepage structural parameters as well as chemical wetting characteristics. The system model characterizes the relationship between the seepage structure and chemical wetting characteristics of coal and the seepage flow. 2) Under combined weighting, the porosity weight is 0.32, which has a greater contribution to the water injection effect, followed by the maximum pore throat radius and contact angle, and the minimum pore throat radius weight is 0.17, which has the least impact on the water injection effect. 3) The evaluation index values of coal samples X1, X2 and X5 are between (0, 0.25), which indicate that the coal seam belongs to the coal seam with difficult water injection; the evaluation index values of coal samples X3 and X4 are between (0.25, 0.50), which imply the coal seam belongs to the one relatively difficult to inject water.

Key words: water injection, characteristics of physicochemical, degree of difficulty, model of evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • X 936
[1] 毛彦军, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成, 李文璞, . 基于CT三维重建的注水煤岩体裂隙扩展规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1717-1726.
[2] 杨赫, 程卫民, 刘震, 王文玉, 赵大伟, 王文迪. 注水煤体有效渗流通道结构分形特征 核磁共振试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[3] 蔡 灿,伍开松,袁晓红 ,吴霁薇 ,赵 攀,. 基于岩石损伤本构的破碎比功评价模型研究与应用[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2576-2584.
[4] 骆行文,姚海林. 基于主成分分析的岩石质量综合评价模型与应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 452-0455.
[5] 单仁亮,黄宝龙,李广景. 基于灰色关联分析的综合评价模型在爆破方案选定中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 206-210.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .