岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1717-1726.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1609

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CT三维重建的注水煤岩体裂隙扩展规律研究

毛彦军1,陈曦1, 2,范超男1,葛少成1,李文璞1   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 安全与应急管理工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 太原理工大学 材料科学与工程学院,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-21 修回日期:2022-04-29 出版日期:2022-06-21 发布日期:2022-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 陈曦,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事矿井通风与粉尘防治方面的研究。E-mail: chenxi01@tyut.edu.cn E-mail:maoyanjun0690@link.tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:毛彦军,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事煤岩渗流力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52174195,No.51804211);山西省基础研究计划(自由探索类)面上项目(No.20210302123122);山西省应用基础研究计划(No.201901D211037)

Crack network evolution of water injection coal and rock mass by means of 3D reconstruction

MAO Yan-jun1, CHEN Xi1, 2, FAN Chao-nan1, GE Shao-cheng1, LI Wen-pu1   

  1. 1. College of Safety and Emergency Management Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2021-09-21 Revised:2022-04-29 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52174195, 51804211), the General Project of Shanxi Basic Research Program (Free Exploration) (20210302123122) and the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi(201901D211037).

摘要: 针对煤层注水防尘过程中注水压力设置不合理、注水渗流效果差等问题,采用CT扫描技术与RFPA软件相结合的方法,构建了可以表征注水煤岩体内部孔裂隙结构的三维细观非均匀渗流损伤数值模型。通过对经过CT三维重构的煤岩模型进行不同注水压力的渗流损伤模拟,研究了煤层注水压力对煤样的渗流破坏、渗透率演化及声发射特性变化的影响;并通过对重构的煤岩模型进行缩放处理,研究了煤岩尺寸对煤样的渗流破坏和声发射变化的影响。研究结果表明:在煤样微观裂隙扩展过程中,随着注水压力的递增,煤样损伤单元数、渗流运动的渗流场分布范围、渗透率、声发射数目和能量总体呈上升趋势,局部范围内有波动发生,发生波动的原因是由于渗流运动的渗流场与煤样裂隙内部应力场发生临界反应,致使煤样破坏单元位置发生改变;煤样渗透率由3.82×10−5 μm2上升至0.314 μm2,孔隙率由5.45%上升至48.45%,揭示了煤岩体裂隙总体上随注水压力增大而不断扩展贯通,局部上随注水压力增大而扩展趋势有所下降的影响规律;随着煤样尺寸的增加,注水破坏后煤样的孔隙率呈现先下降后逐渐平稳的趋势,声发射特性变化趋势正好与之相反,表明煤样的尺寸对注水煤岩渗流破坏有显著影响,但当煤样尺寸超过40 mm时,煤样尺寸对注水煤岩渗流破坏的影响趋于稳定。CT扫描技术与RFPA软件相结合的方法能够有效模拟注水煤岩的裂隙渗流扩展行为。

关键词: 煤层注水, 裂隙扩展, 渗透率, 尺寸效应

Abstract: In view of the unreasonable setting of water injection pressure and poor water injection seepage effect in the process of coal seam water infusion and dust prevention, a three-dimensional meso non-uniform seepage damage numerical model which can characterize the internal pore and fracture structure of water injection coal and rock mass is constructed by using the method of CT scanning technology and RFPA software. Through the seepage damage simulation of coal rock model reconstructed by CT with different water injection pressures, the influence of water injection pressure on the seepage damage permeability, evolution and acoustic emission characteristics of coal rock sample was studied. The effect of coal rock size on seepage damage and acoustic emission of coal rock samples is studied by scaling the reconstructed coal rock model. The results show that in the process of micro fracture propagation of coal sample, with the increase of water injection pressure, the number of damage units, seepage movement distribution range of seepage field, permeability, acoustic emission number and energy of coal sample generally show an upward trend, and there are fluctuations in local area. The reason for the fluctuation is the critical reaction between the seepage field and the internal stress field of coal sample fracture, resulting in the change of the position of coal sample failure unit. The permeability of coal samples increases from 3.82×10−5 μm2 to 0.314 μm2, and the porosity increases from 5.45% to 48.45%, which reveals the influence law that the fractures of coal and rock mass continue to expand and penetrate with the increase of water injection pressure on the whole, and the expansion trend decreases with the increase of water injection pressure on the part. With the increase of coal sample size, the porosity of the coal sample after the water injection failure shows a trend of first decreasing and then gradually stabilizing, and the change trend of acoustic emission characteristic is just the opposite, indicating that the coal sample size has a significant impact on the water injection coal rock seepage failure. However, the impact of the coal sample size on the water injection coal rock seepage failure tends to be stable when the coal sample size exceeds 40 mm. The combination of CT scanning technology and RFPA software can effectively simulate the fracture seepage propagation behavior of water injection coal and rock.

Key words: coal seam water infusion, fracture expansion, permeability, size effect

中图分类号: 

  • X964
[1] 蒋长宝, 余塘, 魏文辉, 段敏克, 杨阳, 魏财, . 加卸载应力作用下煤岩渗透率演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 13-22.
[2] 田佳丽, 王惠民, 刘星星, 向雷, 盛金昌, 罗玉龙, 詹美礼. 考虑不同尺度孔隙压缩敏感性的 砂岩渗透特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 405-415.
[3] 邓申缘, 姜清辉, 商开卫, 井向阳, 熊峰, . 高温对花岗岩微结构及渗透性演化机制影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1601-1611.
[4] 沈扬, 冯照雁, 邓珏, 陈锴嘉, 许俊红, . 南海珊瑚砂地基承载力模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1281-1290.
[5] 孙壮壮, 马刚, 周伟, 王一涵, 陈远, 肖海斌. 颗粒形状对堆石颗粒破碎强度尺寸效应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 430-438.
[6] 张宏学, 刘卫群, . 非平衡解吸状态下页岩气储层渗透率演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2696-2704.
[7] 孟敏强, 王磊, 蒋翔, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 基于尺寸效应的粗粒土单颗粒破碎试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2953-2962.
[8] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[9] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[10] 杨赫, 程卫民, 刘震, 王文玉, 赵大伟, 王文迪. 注水煤体有效渗流通道结构分形特征 核磁共振试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[11] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[12] 杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透 特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[13] 周梦佳, 温彦锋, 邓刚, 王蕴嘉, 宋二祥, . 堆石料单颗粒劈裂试验破碎强度随机性与 尺寸效应的三维离散元模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 503-510.
[14] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
[15] 王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .