岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2140-2153.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1187

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究

王辰霖1，张小东1, 2，杜志刚1   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 能源科学与工程学院，河南 焦作 454000；2. 河南理工大学 中原经济区煤层气（页岩气）协同创新中心，河南 焦作 454000
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-06 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 作者简介:王辰霖，男，1988年生，博士研究生，主要从事矿山岩体力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No.41372162）；河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划（No.14IRTSTHN002）。

Experimental study of the permeability of coal specimen with pre-existing fissure under cyclic loading and unloading

WANG Chen-lin1, ZHANG Xiao-dong1, 2, DU Zhi-gang1   

  1. 1. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Coalbed Methane (Shale Gas) in Central Plains Economics Zone, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
  • Received:2018-07-06 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372162) and the Science and Technology Innovation Team Support Plan of Henan Province (14IRTSTHN002)

PDF (Chinese)

162

摘要： 应用三轴加载煤岩渗流试验装置，对预制贯通裂隙煤样开展循环加卸载轴压渗透率试验，分析循环加卸载轴压作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透率的变化规律及其之间的差异。研究结果表明：预制裂隙煤样渗透率与轴压呈负指数函数关系，渗透率对应力敏感性随加卸载次数增加而降低。加载阶段渗透率差值与卸载阶段渗透率差值随加卸载次数增加而降低，渗透率差值与应力敏感性系数呈正相关性。加载阶段与卸载阶段渗透率存在明显差值，渗透率产生明显损失量，其随加卸载次数增加而降低。竖直裂隙煤样渗透率与应力敏感性系数明显高于水平裂隙煤样与完整煤样，水平裂隙煤样渗透性与完整煤样渗透性相差不大，但水平裂隙煤样应力敏感性系数高于完整煤样。竖直裂隙煤样渗透率差值与渗透率损失量明显高于水平裂隙煤样与完整煤样，水平裂隙煤样渗透率差值高于完整煤样，但两者渗透率损失量相差不大。循环加卸载轴压结束后，完整煤样渗透率损失率最大，水平裂隙煤样渗透率损失率居中，竖直裂隙煤样渗透率损失率最小；竖直裂隙煤样渗透率恢复率最大，水平裂隙煤样渗透率恢复率居中，完整煤样渗透率恢复率最小。

关键词: 循环加卸载, 轴压, 预制贯通裂隙, 渗透率, 应力敏感性

Abstract: The cyclic loading and unloading axial compression tests of coal specimens with the pre-existing transfixion fissure were carried out by triaxial loading coal rock seepage testing device. The permeability variation of coal specimen with pre-existing fissure and the difference with permeability of intact coal specimen were analyzed. The results show that the relationship between permeability and axial compression is a negative exponential function and the stress sensitivity of permeability decreases with the increase of the loading and unloading numbers for coal with pre-existing fissure. The permeability difference of the loading stage and permeability difference of unloading stage decrease with the increase of the loading and unloading numbers. There is a positive correlation between permeability difference and stress sensitivity coefficient. There exists a significant permeability difference during the loading and unloading stage, which indicates that there is apparent loss in permeability and it decreases with the increase of the loading and unloading numbers. The permeability and stress sensitivity coefficient of coal specimens with vertical fissure are higher than those of the coal specimens with horizontal fissure and the intact coal specimens. The permeability of coal specimen with horizontal fissure is similar to that of the intact coal specimen, but the stress sensitivity coefficient is higher than that of the intact coal specimen. The permeability difference and the loss quantity of permeability of coal specimens with vertical fissure are higher than those of the coal specimens with horizontal fissure and intact coal specimens. The permeability difference of coal specimens with horizontal fissure is higher than that of the intact coal specimens, but there is slight difference in the loss quantity of permeability between them. After the cyclic loading and unloading axial compression, the loss rate of permeability is the largest for intact coal specimen, followed by the coal specimen with horizontal fissure and last is the coal specimen with vertical fissure. The recovery rate of permeability is the largest for the coal specimen with vertical fissure, followed by the coal sample with horizontal fissure, and last is the intact coal sample.

Key words: cyclic loading and unloading, axial compression, pre-existing transfixion fissure, permeability, stress sensitivity

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[2] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[5] 赵军, 郭广涛, 徐鼎平, 黄翔, 胡偲, 夏跃林, 张頔. 三轴及循环加卸载应力路径下深埋 硬岩变形破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1521-1530.
[6] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[7] 高峰, 曹善鹏, 熊信, 周科平, 朱龙胤, . 冻融循环作用下受荷青砂岩的脆性演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[8] 杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透 特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[9] 周翠英, 梁宁, 刘镇, . 红层软岩压缩破坏的分形特征与级联失效过程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 21-31.
[10] 任青阳, 张黄梅, 刘佳申, . 两种卸荷路径下泥岩流变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 127-134.
[11] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 丁长栋, 张杨, 杨向同, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, . 致密砂岩高围压和高孔隙水压下渗透率 演化规律及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3300-3308.
[14] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[15] 付龙龙, 周顺华, 田志尧, 田哲侃, . 双轴压缩条件下颗粒材料中力链的演化[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2427-2434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发