岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1453-1468.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1038

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

硫铝酸盐水泥协同垃圾焚烧副产物固化浓缩液 污泥的强度和水稳定性试验研究

梁仕华,冯德銮   

  1. 广东工业大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-09 修回日期:2022-03-21 出版日期:2022-06-21 发布日期:2022-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 冯德銮,男,1985年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: wolfluan@126.com E-mail:shihua_l@gdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:梁仕华,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52078142);广州市科技计划项目(No.202002030194)

Experimental study on strength and water stability of concentrated solution sludge solidified with sulfoaluminate cement collaborating waste incineration by-products

LIANG Shi-hua, FENG De-luan   

  1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2021-07-09 Revised:2022-03-21 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078142) and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (202002030194).

摘要: 采用浸没燃烧工艺产生的生活垃圾卫生填埋场浓缩液污泥具有含水率高、有机质含量和重金属含量低,但含盐量极高的特点。选用硫铝酸盐水泥作为主固化剂,垃圾焚烧飞灰和底渣作为辅助固化剂,制备不同水泥、飞灰和底渣掺量的固化污泥试样,进行一系列的无侧限抗压试验、水稳定性试验和微观测试试验,以定量分析不同固化剂对浓缩液污泥的固化效果,探索固化污泥强度演化规律和浸水劣化机制的宏微观耦合控制机制。试验结果表明:单掺10%水泥,固化污泥的7 d无侧限抗压强度大于50 kPa,即可达到填埋的强度要求;当单掺50%以上的水泥时,28 d龄期的固化污泥才具有满足填埋强度要求的水稳定性;飞灰和底渣对水泥固化试样28 d强度的提升存在一个最优掺量,分别为5%(水泥掺量<40%)和10%(水泥掺量≥40%);在水稳定性方面,复掺底渣较复掺飞灰有效。扫描电镜(SEM)和X射线衍射(XRD)微观测试结果表明:水泥与一定量的飞灰或底渣共同生成的针柱状钙矾石晶体与水泥水化产物形成空间镶嵌互锁结构,是掺飞灰或底渣固化试样水稳定性提高的主要原因。

关键词: 浓缩液污泥, 极高含盐量, 固化稳定化, 垃圾焚烧副产物, 水稳定性

Abstract: The concentrated solution sludge (CSS) produced by submersion combustion process has special characteristics, such as high water content, low organic matter and heavy metals content and extremely high salinity. In this study, sulfoaluminate cement (SAC) was used as the main curing agent, and two kinds of waste incineration fly ash and bottom ash were added as auxiliary curing agents to quantificationally investigate the influence of different curing agents on the solidification effectiveness of CSS, and various solidified CSS samples with a variety of curing agent combinations were prepared for a series of unconfined compressive strength tests, water stability tests and microscopic observation tests. The results show that the strength of CSS solidified with 10% SAC can meet the strength requirement (50 kPa) of landfill under the condition of 7 d curing age; the 28 d strength of the cement solidified samples meet the requirement of water stability as the SAC content exceeds 50%. The optimal dosages of fly ash and bottom ash of 28 d solidified samples are 5% (SAC content <40%) and 10% (SAC content ≥40%). Bottom ash is more effective than fly ash for improving water stability of solidified samples. The SEM and XRD results show that the formation of interlocked structure composed of hydration product of cement and ettringite crystal generated from the interaction between SAC and fly ash or bottom ash, is the major factor improving the water stability of solidified samples with a certain dosage of fly ash or bottom ash.

Key words: concentrated solution sludge, extremely high salinity, solidification/stabilization, waste incineration by-products, water stability

中图分类号: 

  • X53
[1] 周翠英, 赵珊珊, 杨旭, 刘镇, . 生态酯类材料砂土改良及工程护坡应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4828-4837.
[2] 洪宝宁,化君晖,刘 鑫,易进翔, . 高液限土路堤填筑的双指标控制方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 255-262.
[3] 夏威夷 ,杜延军 ,魏明俐 ,薄煜琳 ,宋德君,. 挥发性有机物污染泥浆固化稳定化试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1281-1290.
[4] 杨康辉,欧忠文,肖寒冰,莫金川,刘晋铭. 水泥基渗透结晶型防水材料对硫铝酸盐水泥固化土性能影响及机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 477-486.
[5] 魏明俐,伍浩良,杜延军,夏威夷. 冻融循环下含磷材料固化锌铅污染土的强度及溶出特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 215-219.
[6] 肖寒冰,欧忠文,刘晋铭,莫金川,杨康辉. 钾盐和磷酸盐对固化土早期强度的影响研究[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1643-1648.
[7] 聂庆科,王英辉,梁书奇,张全秀. 广西靖西红黏土及其击实后的水稳定性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1134-1138.
[8] 张大捷 ,田晓峰 ,侯浩波 ,刘 浩 ,谭石康 . 矿渣胶凝材料固化软土的力学性状及机制[J]. , 2007, 28(9): 1987-1991.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .