生态酯类材料砂土改良及工程护坡应用

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1991

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 4828-4837.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1991

生态酯类材料砂土改良及工程护坡应用

周翠英^{1, 2}，赵珊珊^{1, 2}，杨旭^{1, 2}，刘镇^{1, 2}

1. 中山大学土木工程学院，广东广州，510275；2. 中山大学岩土工程与信息技术研究中心，广东广州，510275

收稿日期:2018-10-29 出版日期:2019-12-11 发布日期:2020-01-04
通讯作者: 刘镇，男，1981年生，博士，副教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程的教学与研究工作。E-mail: liuzh8@mail.sysu.edu.cn E-mail:ueit@mail.sysu.edu.cn
作者简介:周翠英，女，1963年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
广东省应用型科技研发专项资金重大项目（No.2015B090925016）；国家自然科学基金（No.41530638）。

Improvement of eco-ester materials on sandy soils and engineering slope protection

ZHOU Cui-ying^{1, 2}, ZHAO Shan-shan^{1, 2}, YANG Xu^{1, 2}, LIU Zhen^{1, 2}

1. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China; 2. Research Center of Geotechnical Engineering and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China

Received:2018-10-29 Online:2019-12-11 Published:2020-01-04
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Major Programs of Applied Science and Technology Research and Development Special Funds of Guangdong Province (2015B090925016) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41530638).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高砂土边坡的稳定性并实现生态护坡，采用生态酯类材料——纳米水性黏合剂对砂土进行改良，通过凝胶渗透色谱法和热重法分别对纳米水性黏合剂的相对分子质量及分布、热稳定性等进行了测试与分析；通过设计并开展不同纳米水性黏合剂掺入量条件下砂土的无侧限抗压强度试验和直接剪切试验，研究了砂土的强度改良效果与规律；通过崩解试验和边坡冲刷模型试验，研究了砂土的遇水稳定性和坡面抗冲刷能力的改良效果与规律，并进一步分析了砂土改良及生态护坡机制。结果表明，纳米水性黏合剂能提高砂土的强度、水稳定性及坡面抗冲刷能力。随黏合剂掺入量的增加，砂土的无侧限抗压强度和黏聚力增大，黏聚力的增加幅度可达46%～77%，而内摩擦角变化较小；砂土的崩解系数和峰值崩解速率减小，最大崩解速率出现的时间越发滞后；坡面冲刷率降低约68%～86%。边坡防护工程实际应用效果表明，纳米水性黏合剂的固土效果好，作用时间长，促进植被生长，实现了边坡的长效生态防护。

关键词: 生态酯类材料, 砂土, 水稳定性, 抗冲刷, 植被生长, 生态护坡

Abstract: To improve the stability of sandy slope and achieve ecological slope protection, a kind of eco-ester-polymer named as Aqua-Dispersing-Nano-Binder (ADNB) was used to reinforce sandy soils. Properties of molecular weight and thermal stability of ADNB were tested through gel permeation chromatography (GPC) method and thermogravimetric (TG) method. The effects and the regularity of strength improvement of sandy soils were studied by designing and carrying out tests of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and direct shear under the condition of different ADNB dosages. Finally, the disintegrating test and the slope scour model test have been performed to investigate the improvement effect and regularity of both water stability of sandy soils and the anti-erosion ability of slope surface, and the improvement mechanism of sandy soils and ecological slope protection was further analyzed. Results show that ADNB can improve the strength and water stability of sandy soils, and the erosion resistance of sandy slope surface is improved. With the increase of ADNB dosage, the UCS and cohesive force of sandy soils are increased, in which the increase of cohesive force is 46%-77% while internal friction angle has no significant change; the peak disintegration rate and the disintegration coefficient of sandy soils decreases, besides, the occurrence time of the maximum disintegration rate is more and more delayed; the erosion rate of slope surface decreases about 68%-86%. The application effect of slope protection engineering shows that ADNB performed well on stabilizing soils with a long time and promoting the vegetation growth. As a result, the long-term ecological protection of slope is achieved.

Key words: eco-ester materials, sandy soils, water stability, erosion resistance, vegetation growth, ecological slope protection

中图分类号:

TU 443

周翠英, 赵珊珊, 杨旭, 刘镇, . 生态酯类材料砂土改良及工程护坡应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4828-4837.

ZHOU Cui-ying, ZHAO Shan-shan, YANG Xu, LIU Zhen, . Improvement of eco-ester materials on sandy soils and engineering slope protection[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4828-4837.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[2]	孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[3]	米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[4]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[5]	孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[6]	孙逸飞, 陈成, . 无状态变量的状态依赖剪胀方程及其本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1813-1822.
[7]	庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[8]	魏星, 张昭, 王刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[9]	张勋, 黄茂松, 胡志平, . 砂土中单桩水平循环累积变形特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 933-941.
[10]	陆勇, 周国庆, 杨冬英, 宋家庆, . 砂土剪胀软化、剪缩硬化统一本构的显式计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[11]	张成功, 尹振宇, 吴则祥, 金银富, . 颗粒形状对粒状材料圆柱塌落影响的三维离散元模拟 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1197-1203.
[12]	董建勋, 刘海笑, 李洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[13]	王东伟, 陆武萍, 唐朝生, 赵红崴, 李胜杰, 林銮, 冷挺, . 砂土微观结构样品制备技术及量化方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4783-4792.
[14]	沙飞, 李术才, 林春金, 刘人太, 张庆松, 杨磊, 李召峰. 砂土介质注浆渗透扩散试验与加固机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4259-4269.
[15]	高源, 刘海笑, 李洲, . 适用于饱和砂土循环动力分析边界面塑性模型的显式积分算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3951-3958.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

生态酯类材料砂土改良及工程护坡应用

Improvement of eco-ester materials on sandy soils and engineering slope protection

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0