岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1813-1822.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0081

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

无状态变量的状态依赖剪胀方程及其本构模型

孙逸飞1,陈 成2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098; 2. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-12 出版日期:2019-05-11 发布日期:2019-06-02
  • 作者简介:孙逸飞,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,主要从事分数阶塑性力学及土体本构模型方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费(No. 2017B05214);博士后面上基金项目(No. 2017M621607)。

A state-dependent stress-dilatancy equation without state index and its associated constitutive model

SUN Yi-fei1, CHEN Cheng2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070
  • Received:2018-01-12 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017B05214) and the Research Funds from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M621607).

摘要: 粗粒土的剪胀行为具有状态依赖特性。为了考虑这一特性,不同的状态依赖变量被唯像地提出,并被经验性地内嵌入已有剑桥、修正剑桥等剪胀方程中。基于分数阶梯度律,用理论推导出了分数阶状态依赖剪胀方程,并阐述了分数阶数的物理意义。所得剪胀比大小受3个因素影响:分数阶求导阶数、当前加载应力以及当前应力到临界状态应力的距离。当分数阶求导阶数从1开始增大时,分数阶剪胀曲线自修正剑桥剪胀曲线向剑桥剪胀曲线移动;而当求导阶数从1开始减小时,分数阶剪胀曲线逐渐远离修正剑桥剪胀曲线;当求导阶数等于1时,分数阶剪胀曲线与修正剑桥剪胀曲线重合。为验证所提出的状态依赖剪胀方程,基于该方程进一步建立了砂土的状态依赖分数阶塑性力学本构模型,并对砂土和堆石料的三轴排水与不排水试验结果进行了模拟。研究表明,基于状态依赖分数阶剪胀方程建立的本构模型,可以合理地描述砂土在不同初始状态及加载条件下的应力-应变行为。与砂土UH模型预测结果对比发现,UH模型预测较好。

关键词: 分数阶微分, 塑性力学, 本构模型, 状态依赖, 砂土

Abstract: It has been recognized that the stress-dilatancy behaviour of granular soil depends on its material state. To consider such state-dependence, a variety of state parameters were suggested phenomenologically and incorporated into existing stress-dilatancy equations, e.g. Cam-clay equation, modified Cam-clay equation, by experience. In this study, a novel state-dependent stress-dilatancy equation is developed by using fractional stress gradient, where physical meaning of the fractional order is provided. The obtained stress-dilatancy ratio is determined by three factors: the fractional order, current load stress, and the distance from current stress to critical state stress. When the fractional order is larger than 1, the stress-dilatancy curve shifts from the modified Cam-clay stress-dilatancy curve towards the Cam-clay stress-dilatancy curve. However, when the fractional order is smaller than 1, the stress-dilatancy curve is located above the modified Cam-clay stress-dilatancy curve. When the fractional order is equal to 1, the proposed stress-dilatancy curve coincides with the modified Cam-clay curve. To validate the proposed approach, a state-dependent fractional plasticity model for sand soils is established by using the proposed stress-dilatancy equation. Then, a series of drained and undrained triaxial compression tests on sand and rockfill with different initial states is simulated and compared, from which a good agreement between the model simulations and the corresponding test results can be observed. Comparison with the model predictions of the UH sand model indicates that the UH model gives better prediction.

Key words: fractional calculus, plasticity, constitutive model, state dependence, sand

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[3] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[5] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[6] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[7] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[8] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[9] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[10] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[11] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[12] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[13] 覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合 受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[14] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[15] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!