岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 82-90.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1875

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究

何鹏飞1, 2, 4,马 巍2,穆彦虎2,黄永庭2, 4,董建华3   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 理学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;2. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院 冻土工程国家重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000; 3. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;4. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 马巍,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,从事冻土力学与工程方面研究。E-mail:mawei@lzb.ac.cn E-mail:hepf17@163.com
  • 作者简介:何鹏飞,男,1989年生,博士研究生,从事冻土力学与工程方面研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划重点专项(No.2017YFC0405101);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41630636, No.41772325)

Experimental analysis of interfacial shear behavior of loess-mortar block and construction of constitutive model

HE Peng-fei1, 2, 4, MA Wei2, MU Yan-hu2, HUANG Yong-ting2, 4, DONG Jian-hua3   

  1. 1. School of Science, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 4. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-10-08 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFC0405101) and the National Natural Science Foundations of China(41630636, 41772325).

摘要: 构筑物与土体接触面力学行为是岩土工程研究的热点之一。基于一系列直剪试验,研究不同法向压力、土体含水率条件下黄土?水泥砂浆块界面剪切特性。结果表明,(1) 在土体含水率为9.2和13.1%条件下,法向压力为50、100 kPa时黄土?沙浆块界面剪切应力?位移曲线表现为应变软化型,且可分为峰值前、峰值后及残余阶段三部分,在法向压力为200、300 kPa时表现为应变硬化型;在土体含水率为17.1、20.8%条件下,不同法向压力时黄土?砂浆块界面剪切应力?位移曲线均为应变硬化型;(2) 黄土?砂浆块界面的抗剪强度包络线符合摩尔?库仑准则,随着含水率的增大,界面黏聚强度降低显著,摩擦强度略有增加,整体抗剪强度降低。当土体含水率由9.2%增加至20.8%时,界面黏聚力由41.5 kPa下降至3.6 kPa,界面摩擦系数由0.50增大至0.58。用非线性模型对界面剪切应力?位移曲线关系进行拟合,结果表明非线性模型可较好反映黄土?砂浆块界面的剪切特性。

关键词: 剪切试验, 界面特性, 非线性本构模型, 黄土, 水泥砂浆

Abstract: The mechanical behavior of the interface between the structure and soil has become one of the hotspots in geotechnical engineering. A series of direct shear tests on the loess-cement mortar interface was carried out to study the interfacial shear properties under different normal stresses and water contents of soil. The results show that: (1) the shear stress-horizontal displacement curve of the loess-cement mortar interface presents strain-softening characteristics, including the pre-peak, post-peak and residual strength regions, with the normal stress of 50 and 100 kPa and the water content of 9.2% and 13.1%. While it presents a strain- hardening state when the normal stress is 200 and 300 kPa. When the water content of the soil is 17.1% and 20.8%, the shear stress-displacement curves at the loess-cement mortar interface show the strain-hardening effect with different vertical stresses. (2) The shear strength envelope of the loess-cement mortar interface is in accordance with the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. The shear strength of the loess-sand block interface meets the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. As the water content increases, the interface cohesive strength decreases significantly, while the frictional strength increases slightly, and the overall shear strength decreases. When the soil moisture content increased from 9.2% to 20.8%, the interface cohesion decreased from 41.5 to 3.6 kPa, and the interface friction coefficient increased from 0.50 to 0.58. The nonlinear model is used to fit the shear stress-displacement curve of the interface. The results show that the nonlinear model can better reflects the shear behavior of the loess-mortar block interface.

Key words: direct shear test, interface properties, nonlinear constitutive model, loess, cement mortar

中图分类号: 

  • TU444
[1] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[2] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 温馨, 胡志平, 张勋, 柴少波, 吕新波, . 基于Green-Ampt模型的饱和−非饱和黄土入渗 改进模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1991-2000.
[5] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[6] 刘华, 何江涛, 赵茜, 王铁行, 郭超翊, . 酸污染原状黄土渗透微观特征演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 765-772.
[7] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[8] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[9] 闫超萍, 龙志林, 周益春, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, . 钙质砂剪切特性的围压效应和粒径效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[10] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] 刘华, 张硕成, 牛富俊, 邵珠山, 牛泽林, 鲁洁, . 酸碱污染Q3黄土的一维压缩特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 210-216.
[12] 朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合 管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[13] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[14] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[15] 王铁行, 金 鑫, 罗 扬, 张松林. 考虑卸荷作用的黄土湿陷性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1281-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!