岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2261-2270.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1522

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究

张磊1, 2,海维深1, 2,甘浩1, 2,曹卫平1, 2,王铁行1, 2   

  1. 1. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 西安建筑科技大学 陕西省岩土与地下空间工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710055
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-03 修回日期:2019-12-31 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:张磊,男,1981年生,博士,讲师,主要从事土与结构物相互作用方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51508455);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(No. 2019JM-232)

Study on bearing behavior of flexible single pile subject to horizontal and uplift combined load

ZHANG Lei1, 2, HAI Wei-shen1, 2, GAN Hao1, 2, CAO Wei-ping1, 2, WANG Tie-hang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Space Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China
  • Received:2019-09-03 Revised:2019-12-31 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508455) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2019JM-232).

摘要: 为探讨柔性单桩在水平与上拔组合荷载下的承载特性,开展了两组共6根单桩室内模型加载试验。其结果表明:相比于纯水平受荷桩的极限承载力Hu1,预先施加不超过0.5Tu1(纯上拔桩的极限承载力)的上拔荷载能够提高单桩的水平极限承载力,且随上拔荷载增加,水平极限承载力先增大后减小;增大预先施加的上拔荷载降低了同一水平荷载下桩身的弯矩及土反力,也削弱了地基的水平刚度,综合影响下桩身的水平位移先减小后增大;预先施加不超过0.5Hu1的水平荷载主要增大0~10D(D为外径)范围内桩身的平均摩阻力从而提高上拔极限承载力值,且水平荷载越大,其提高效果越显著;当水平荷载达到0.5Hu1时,对应的上拔极限承载力相比Tu1增加了17.1%,设计中可对增加的上拔极限承载力给予考虑。进一步通过理论研究验证了试验结果的合理性,给出了组合荷载下柔性桩的上拔极限承载力计算公式,其计算误差在6%范围内。

关键词: 桩基础, 承载特性, 模型试验, 组合荷载, 桩?土相互作用, 黄土地基

Abstract: In order to study the bearing behavior of a flexible single pile under combined horizontal and uplift loading, two groups of structural testing, comprised of 6 pile models in total have been carried out. The results show that for a flexible single pile, pre-applied uplift load with a magnitude smaller than half of pure uplifting capacity(Tu1) lead to significant improvement of ultimate horizontal bearing capacity, achieving greater horizontal resistance compared to pure ultimate horizontal bearing capacity (Hu1) Additionally, it has been observed that this horizontal bearing capacity increases initially but decreases subsequently under further increasing uplift load. This load increasing results in reduction of bending moment and soil resistance whilst degrades horizontal stiffness, and consequently, the horizontal displacement of pile increases initially but decreases subsequently under resultant effect. The ultimate uplift bearing capacity of a flexible single pile could be improved under pre-applied horizontal loads not exceeding 0.5Hu1, mainly attributed by increasing the average side friction of pile within the distance of 10 times the diameter of pile below the ground surface. This capacity is strengthened under larger horizontal load, and when this load reaches 0.5Hu1, the magnitude is increased by 17.1% compared with Tu1. This behavior could be taken into account with respect to pile design. The precision of test results has been verified by theoretical analysis, and a formula for calculating the ultimate uplift bearing capacity of flexible single pile under combined loads has been proposed. The corresponding analysis results have achieved good agreements with testing data and the error is less than 6%.

Key words: pile foundations, bearing behavior, model tests, combined loading, soil-pile interaction, loess subgrade

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[2] 杨军, 孙晓立, 卞德存, 邵继喜, . 基于平行地震波法探测桩基缺陷的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 874-881.
[3] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[4] 万志辉, 戴国亮, 龚维明, 高鲁超, 徐艺飞, . 钙质砂后压浆桩水平承载性状模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 411-418.
[5] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[6] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[7] 刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[8] 李建东, 王旭, 张延杰, 蒋代军, 刘德仁, 李盛, . 水蒸气增湿非饱和黄土热湿迁移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 186-192.
[9] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[10] 刘润, 曹添铭, 陈广思, 张海洋, 李成凤. 插拔桩靴对临近桩靴承载力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2943-2952.
[11] 曾超峰, 薛秀丽, 宋伟炜, 李淼坤, 白宁. 开挖前降水引发基坑变形机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2963-2972.
[12] 胡伟, 孟建伟, 姚琛, 雷勇, . 浅埋平板圆锚竖向拉拔极限承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3049-3055.
[13] 罗易, 张家铭, 周峙, 契霍特金, 米敏, 沈筠, . 降雨-蒸发条件下土体开裂临界 含水率演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2592-2600.
[14] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[15] 邓玮婷, 丁选明, 彭宇, . 珊瑚砂地基中膨胀混凝土桩竖向受压承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2814-2820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[6] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[7] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[8] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[9] 徐远杰,潘家军,刘祖德. 混凝土面板堆石坝的一种坝坡修整算法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3139 -3144 .
[10] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .