岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 3047-3058.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2132

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应力幅值比对土-结构接触面非共轴特性影响研究

冯大阔1, 2, 3,张建民1   

  1. 1. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 100084;2. 郑州大学 水利科学与工程学院,河南 郑州 450001; 3. 中国建筑第七工程局有限公司,河南 郑州 450004
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-19 修回日期:2022-05-20 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 作者简介:冯大阔,男,1984年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事土与结构相互作用、绿色建造、装配式建造等研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52079126);中原青年拔尖人才支持项目(No. ZYQR201912156)。

Role of stress amplitude ratio in the non-coaxial behavior of the interface between gravel and structure

FENG Da-kuo1, 2, 3, ZHANG Jian-min1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. School of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China; 3. China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450004, China
  • Received:2021-12-19 Revised:2022-05-20 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079126) and the Tiptop Young Talent Program of Central Plains (ZYQR201912156).

摘要:

运用80 t大型三维多功能土工试验机(3DMAS),进行了不同应力幅值比下粗粒土与结构接触面大型三维循环直剪试验,深入分析了应力控制往返椭圆剪切路径下接触面切向位移、非共轴角和剪切柔度等三维力学特性以及应力幅值比的影响规律。应力控制往返椭圆剪切路径下,接触面产生了明显的x向和y向位移、非共轴角和剪切柔度。x向和y向位移幅值、剪切柔度峰值均随循环剪切的进行逐渐减小而后趋于稳定,表现出演化特性。非共轴角受切向应力幅值及切向应力增量方向共同影响,其最值、稳定值随循环周次基本保持不变;正向剪切时非共轴角最大值(最小值)与反向剪切时最小值(最大值)基本出现在同一位置。接触面剪切柔度与非共轴角随旋转角度的变化趋势相反,剪切柔度的增加会抑制非共轴角的发展,反之亦然,两者对立统一。应力幅值比对接触面切向位移间椭圆关系及其时程变化形式、切向应力位移类椭圆关系等影响较小,主要影响切向位移幅值及其偏移程度、切向位移间椭圆关系的长短轴大小及方向、切向应力位移类椭圆关系的长短轴大小、非共轴角的数值及其随旋转角度的变化形式和最值出现位置、剪切柔度随旋转角度的变化形式和峰值及其产生位置等。应力幅值比越大,切向位移幅值越大、向负向偏移越大,剪切柔度峰值越大,随循环剪切的进行减小的速率越慢。应力幅值比ξτ=1和ξτ≠1时接触面非共轴角和剪切柔度随旋转角度的发展变化形式差别很大。

关键词: 土与结构接触面, 三维直剪试验, 非共轴角, 剪切柔度, 应力幅值比

Abstract: A series of 3D cyclic large-scale direct-shear tests of a gravel-structure interface was conducted at different stress amplitude ratios using 80 t 3D multifunction apparatus for soil-structure interface (3DMAS). The 3D cyclic interface behavior, including tangential deformation, non-coaxial angle and shear flexibility, was addressed in stress-controlled two-way elliptical shear path and the influence of stress amplitude ratio was discussed in detail. Distinct tangential displacements in the x and y directions, non-coaxial angle, shear flexibility are observed subjected to two-way elliptical cycling of shear stress. The tangential displacement amplitudes in the x and y directions and the shear flexibility of the interface gradually decrease with cyclic shearing and then tends to be stabilized, indicating noticeable evolution characteristics. The non-coaxial angle is significantly dependent on the shear stress amplitude and the shear stress increment direction, and the maximum, minimum and stabilized non-coaxial angles almost remain invariable throughout cyclic shearing. The development of the shear flexibility against rotation angle is contrary to that of the non-coaxial angle, and the rapid growth of the peak shear flexibility will impede the development of the non-coaxial angle of the interface. The stress amplitude ratio slightly influences the relationship patterns of the tangential displacements in the x and y directions and their relationship patterns against shear cycle, and the shear stress-displacement relationship patterns, but significantly affects the tangential displacement amplitudes and their migration extent, the length of the major and minor axis of the elliptical curves of the tangential displacements in the x and y directions and of the shear stress-displacement response, as well as the magnitude and development trend of the non-coaxial angle and shear flexibility. Increased stress amplitude ratio leads to magnified tangential displacement amplitudes and enlarged migration towards the negative direction, increased peak shear flexibility and slowed evolution with cyclic shearing. In addition, the non-coaxial angle and the shear flexibility present different performances when the stress amplitude ratio equals and does not equal 1.0.

Key words: soil-structure interface, 3D direct-shear test, non-coaxial angle, shear flexibility, stress amplitude ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 冯大阔, 张建民, . 法向应力对接触面循环单剪力学特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 18-26.
[2] 王 伟 ,卢廷浩 ,宰金珉,. 含水率对不同接触面抗剪强度影响直剪试验分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 501-504.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .