岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3426-3436.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0087

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高静应力与低频扰动耦合作用下砂岩的 力学响应特征

文晓泽1, 2, 3,冯国瑞1, 2, 3,王朋飞1, 2, 3,郭军1, 2, 3, 4,钱瑞鹏1, 2, 3, 白锦文1, 2, 3, 4,樊一江1, 2, 3,朱林俊1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 太原理工大学 矿山岩层控制及灾害防控山西省重点实验室,山西 太原 030024; 3. 山西浙大新材料与化工研究院,山西 太原 030024;4. 山西焦煤集团有限责任公司,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-17 修回日期:2022-05-17 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 冯国瑞,男,1976年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事遗留煤炭资源开采与灾害防控方面的研究工作。E-mail: fguorui@163.com E-mail:wenxiaoze@163.com
  • 作者简介:文晓泽,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51904203,No.51925402,No.52174125);山西省科技重大专项项目(No.20201102004)。

Mechanical response of sandstone under coupling action of high static stress and low frequency disturbance

WEN Xiao-ze1, 2, 3, FENG Guo-rui1, 2, 3, WANG Peng-fei1, 2, 3, GUO Jun1, 2, 3, 4, QIAN Rui-peng1, 2, 3, BAI Jin-wen1, 2, 3, 4, FAN Yi-jiang1, 2, 3, ZHU Lin-jun1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. College of Mining Technology, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Shanxi Province for Mine Rock Strata Control and Disaster Prevention, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 3. Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 4. Shanxi Cooking Coal Group Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2022-01-17 Revised:2022-05-17 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51904203, 51925402, 52174125) and the Shanxi Science and Technology Major Project (20201102004).

摘要: 低频扰动荷载作用下高应力状态岩石的力学响应特性是残采区上行开采层间岩层稳定性的重要影响因素。基于自主研发的动静载耦合电液伺服试验机,开展动静载耦合作用下高应力状态砂岩巴西劈裂试验,分析低频扰动荷载幅值对高静应力砂岩力学响应特征的影响。结果表明:(1)高应力状态砂岩不会在小幅扰动荷载作用过程中破坏,但扰动损伤会降低岩样抗拉强度,基于层间岩层静态力学特性的上行开采稳定性分析中应纳入合适的折减系数;(2)高静应力砂岩破坏前的扰动荷载循环次数随幅值升高而降低,幅值为5.0、7.5、10 kN组岩样破坏前的扰动荷载循环次数均值分别为157、70、3;(3)引入描述流体状态的“紊流”形象化表达扰动荷载作用过程中附加能量的快速输入与输出,呈“紊流”状态的附加能量弱化了砂岩裂纹扩展的有序性,诱使砂岩破坏瞬间发生大规模裂纹扩展。该研究成果可为残采区上行开采稳定性分析提供一定参考。

关键词: 高静应力, 动静载耦合, 动态响应, 上行开采

Abstract: The dynamic response of rock in high stress state under low-frequency disturbance load are important factors affecting the stability of interlayer strata during upward mining in residual mining area. Brazilian splitting test on sandstone in high stress state under dynamic and static load coupling was carried out using the self-developed dynamic and static load coupling test machine. The effect of low frequency disturbance load amplitudes on the mechanical response characteristics of high static stress sandstone was analyzed. The results show that: 1) The sandstone in high stress state will not be destroyed in the process of small disturbance load, but the disturbance damage will reduce the tensile strength of rock specimens. Therefore, the appropriate reduction factor should be introduced into the upward mining stability analysis based on the static mechanical parameters of interlayer rock. 2) The fatigue life of sandstone decreases with the increase of the amplitude of the disturbance load. The average number of dynamic load cycles before failure of the sandstone subjected to the load the amplitude of 5.0, 7.5 and 10 kN is 157, 70 and 3, respectively. 3) The “turbulence” describing the fluid state is introduced to visualize the fast input and output of additional energy in the process of disturbance load. The additional energy flow in the state of “turbulence” weakens the orderliness of sandstone crack propagation, and induces large-scale crack propagation at the moment of sandstone failure. The research results can provide certain reference for the stability analysis of upward mining in residual mining area.

Key words: high static stress, dynamic and static load coupling, dynamic response, upward mining

中图分类号: 

  • TU452
[1] 牛婷婷, 孙广超, . 高速铁路X形桩桩网复合地基动态响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1266-1280.
[2] 王新志,谌 民,魏厚振,孟庆山,余克服,. 车辆荷载作用下钙质砂路基的动态响应试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4093-4101.
[3] 王汉鹏 ,薛俊华 ,李建明 ,张庆贺 ,马芹永,. 隧洞开挖围岩动态卸载响应特征模拟研究[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1481-1487.
[4] 徐 平 ,李小春 ,周新民,. 瓦斯抽采过程中孔壁的动态响应分析[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 123-130.
[5] 李志勇,邓宗伟. 预应力锚索桩板墙动态响应规律研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 645-648.
[6] 毕忠伟,张 明,金 峰,丁德馨. 地震作用下边坡的动态响应规律研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 180-183.
[7] 卿启湘 ,王永和 ,赵明华 . 秦沈客运专线路桥(涵)过渡段路基的动力特性分析[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2415-2421.
[8] 肖 宏 ,罗 强 ,邓江东 ,华 明 . 混凝土夯扩桩和土工格室加固铁路基床试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2157-2162.
[9] 贾永刚,董好刚,单红仙,刘小丽,刘红军. 黄河三角洲粉质土硬壳层特征及成因研究[J]. , 2007, 28(10): 2029-2035.
[10] 上官子昌 ,李守巨 ,程 冬 ,曹海云,. 爆炸荷载作用下浅埋结构动态响应有限元计算[J]. , 2006, 27(S2): 841-844.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .