岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2899-2906.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.2012

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同应力下煤体钻孔试验及钻进能量响应研究

赵志刚1, 2,张凯1,尹延春1, 2,齐炎山1   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 能源与矿业工程学院,山东 青岛 266590; 2. 山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-29 接受日期:2023-03-28 出版日期:2023-10-13 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 尹延春,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,从事矿山岩体力学与测试方面的研究。E-mail: yycrsd@163.com E-mail:zzgwb1997@163.com
  • 作者简介:赵志刚,男,1972年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,从事矿山岩石力学与随钻测量方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金重大基础研究项目(No.ZR2019ZD13);国家自然科学基金(No.52074167)。

Drilling test and drilling energy response of coal under different stresses

ZHAO Zhi-gang1, 2, ZHANG Kai1, YIN Yan-chun1, 2, QI Yan-shan1   

  1. 1. College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2022-12-29 Accepted:2023-03-28 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Basic Research Project of Shandong Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019ZD13) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52074167).

摘要:

针对钻孔过程中煤体应力对钻进能量的影响问题,利用自制的恒钻压钻进试验装置开展煤岩钻孔试验,测定了钻进参数,研究了钻进能量与煤体应力的关系;利用钻屑参数计算了钻屑表面能,研究了煤体应力与表面能的关系,通过对比钻进能量和钻屑表面能,对钻孔过程中能量的转化进行了分析。研究结果表明:扭矩功在钻进能量中占比95%以上,钻进能量随煤体应力增加而增加,近似呈线性关系;钻屑量和钻屑表面能均随煤体应力增加而增加,钻进能量向钻屑表面能转化过程中存在8%~33%的能量损耗,损耗能量的形式主要是声能和钻头摩擦生热。

关键词: 钻进能量, 钻屑表面能, 能量转化, 能量传递效率, 煤体应力

Abstract: To investigate the effect of coal stress on drilling energy during coal drilling, the coal rock drilling experiment was carried out by using the self-made drilling experimental device with constant drilling pressure, the drilling parameters were measured, and the relationship between drilling energy and coal stress was studied. The surface energy of drill cuttings was calculated by using drill cuttings parameters, and the relationship between coal stress and surface energy was examined. By comparing the drilling energy and the surface energy of drill cuttings, the energy conversion during drilling was analyzed. It was shown that the torque work accounted for more than 95% of drilling energy, and the drilling energy increased with the increase of coal stress, which is approximately in linear correlation with coal stress. The amount of drill cuttings and the surface energy of drill cuttings were both increased with increasing of coal stress. There was 8%−33% energy loss during the conversion of drilling energy to the surface energy of drill cuttings. Energy loss was mainly contributed by acoustical energy and frictional heat loss.

Key words: drilling energy, surface energy of drill cuttings, transformation of energy, energy transfer efficiency, coal stress

中图分类号: 

  • TD313
[1] 闫长斌, 李高留, 陈健, 李严, 杨延栋, 杨风威, 杨继华, . 基于新表面理论的TBM破岩效率评价指标[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1153-1164.
[2] 张国凯,李海波,夏 祥,李俊如,于 崇,刘景森. 岩石单轴压缩下能量与损伤演化规律研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 94-100.
[3] 顾成壮 ,杨鸿发 ,胡卸文 ,曾锦秀 ,罗 刚 . 模糊综合评判法分析地震滑坡启程能量转换[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 297-302.
[4] 田 昊,李术才,薛翊国,邱道宏,苏茂鑫,王 凯. 基于钻进能量理论的隧道凝灰岩地层界面识别及围岩分级方法[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2457-2464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙树林,李 方,谌 军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[2] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[3] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[4] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .
[10] 马 刚 ,常晓林 ,周 伟 ,周创兵 . 基于Cosserat理论的重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1505 -1512 .