动载确定方法对岩石动态断裂韧度测试的影响

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 2721-2726.

动载确定方法对岩石动态断裂韧度测试的影响

张盛¹，李新文^{1, 2}，杨向浩¹

1. 河南理工大学能源科学与工程学院，河南焦作 454003；2. 潞安集团余吾煤业公司，山西长治 046103

收稿日期:2013-05-09 出版日期:2013-09-11 发布日期:2013-09-13
作者简介:张盛，男，1976年生，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事岩石力学与矿井巷道支护方面的教学与研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51004043)；河南理工大学硕士学位论文创新基金(No. 2011-M-39)

Influence of different dynamic load calculating methods on rock dynamic fracture toughness test

ZHANG Sheng¹，LI Xin-wen^{1, 2}，YANG Xiang-hao¹

1. College of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 2. Yuwu Coal Industry Corporation, Lu’an Group, Changzhi, Shanxi 046103, China

Received:2013-05-09 Online:2013-09-11 Published:2013-09-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考察不同方法确定的动态载荷对测试岩石动态断裂韧度的影响，在SHPB压杆系统上动态冲击直径80 mm的大理岩圆孔裂缝平台巴西圆盘，获得了弹性压杆上的应力波形，间接计算得到3种不同的作用在圆盘端部的动态载荷。将载荷输入ANSYS动态有限元模型中，求得了相应的动态应力强度因子，并根据试验-数值分析方法确定了岩石的动态断裂韧度测试值。结果表明，在加载速率约为4.0×104 MPa•m1/2/s的条件下，采用三波法确定的大理岩的平均动态断裂韧度为 3.92 MPa•m1/2，采用一波法比三波法计算的结果偏低11.22%，采用二波法比三波法计算的结果偏高20.15%，3种方法得到的结果差异较大。应力波在传播过程中，通过圆盘表面和预制裂缝面发生散射，部分能量不断发生释放是造成圆盘试件两端加载载荷不相等的主要原因。三波法是3种方法中比较理想的动态载荷确定方法，但需要考察试件的动态应力平衡性。

关键词: 动态载荷, 岩石动态断裂韧度, 圆盘试件, 分离式霍普金森压杆, 三波法

Abstract: To investigate the influence of testing rock dynamic fracture toughness by dynamic load calculated using different methods, some holed-crack flattened Brazilian disc specimens（HCFBD）with diameter of 80 mm are impacted in SHPB system. The stress waveforms in the elastic compression bar are got, and the dynamic loads applied on the disc are calculated indirectly using three kinds of methods. When the different loads are inputted in ANSYS dynamic finite element mode, the dynamic stress intensity factors could be made, and the corresponding test values of dynamic rock fracture toughness are got on the base of experimental—numerical method. Results show that the average dynamic fracture toughness of marble is 3.92 MPa•m1/2, as the loading rate is about 4.0× 104 MPa•m1/2/s. Compared with the test value by “three wave method”, it is 11.22% less by “one waves method”; and 20.15% more by “two waves method”. So, the results are very different using three methods. The dynamic loads on both ends of disc specimen are not equal, because part of energy is released continually when the stress waves scatter through the surfaces and the prefabricated crack of the disc specimen in the whole transmission process. “Three waves method” is a relatively ideal one to determine the dynamic load on the disc specimen in three methods, but the dynamic stress balance should be surveyed.

Key words: dynamic load, rock dynamic fracture toughness, disc specimen, split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), three waves method

中图分类号:

TU 452

张盛，李新文，杨向浩 . 动载确定方法对岩石动态断裂韧度测试的影响[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2721-2726.

ZHANG Sheng ，LI Xin-wen ，YANG Xiang-hao . Influence of different dynamic load calculating methods on rock dynamic fracture toughness test[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2721-2726.

参考文献

相关文章 11

[1]	吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王斌, 李玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[2]	魏久淇, 吕亚茹, 刘国权, 张磊, 李磊, . 钙质砂一维冲击响应及吸能特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 191-198.
[3]	马冬冬，马芹永，袁璞，姚兆明, . 主动围压状态人工冻结砂土SHPB试验与分析[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2957-2961.
[4]	李明，茅献彪，曹丽丽，茅蓉蓉，陶静，. 高温后砂岩动力特性应变率效应的试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3479-3488.
[5]	丁育青，汤文辉，徐鑫，冉宪文. 单轴压缩下非饱和黏土动态力学性能试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2546-2550.
[6]	袁璞，马芹永. 干湿循环条件下煤矿砂岩分离式霍普金森压杆试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2557-2562.
[7]	苟小平，杨井瑞，王启智 . 基于P-CCNBD试样的岩石动态断裂韧度测试方法[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2449-2459.
[8]	代仁平，郭学彬，宫全美，蒲传金，张志呈. 隧道围岩爆破损伤防护的霍普金森压杆试验[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 77-83.
[9]	张盛，王启智. 用5种圆盘试件的劈裂试验确定岩石断裂韧度[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 12-18.
[10]	胡华，顾恒星，俞登荣. 淤泥质软土动态流变特性与流变参数研究[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 696-700.
[11]	胡华. 动载作用下淤泥质软土流变模型与流变方程[J]. , 2007, 28(2): 237-240.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed