›› 2014, Vol. 299 ›› Issue (2): 351-358.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桩承式加筋路堤三维土拱效应试验研究

曹卫平,胡伟伟   

  1. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,西安 710055
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-20 出版日期:2014-02-11 发布日期:2014-02-18
  • 作者简介:曹卫平,男,1969年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51078308)。

Experimental study of 3D soil arching in piled reinforced embankments

CAO Wei-ping, HU Wei-wei   

  1. School of Civil Engineering , Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
  • Received:2013-07-20 Online:2014-02-11 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 桩承式加筋路堤受力性状比较复杂,土拱效应对路堤的承载变形性状具有重要影响。通过三维土拱效应模型试验,研究桩-土相对位移、路堤高度、桩帽净间距和水平加筋体拉伸强度等因素对桩土应力比及路堤沉降的影响。结果表明:土拱效应发挥程度与桩-土相对位移密切相关,存在一个临界桩-土相对位移使得桩土应力比达到最大值,该临界桩-土相对位移约为6~8 mm。路堤高度与桩帽净间距之比越大,桩土应力比越大,路堤顶面差异沉降越小;桩帽宽度与桩帽净间距之比越大,桩土应力比越大,路堤顶面差异沉降越小。设置水平加筋体能有效提高桩土应力比并减小路堤顶面沉降;路堤越低,水平加筋体对桩土应力比的提高作用及对路面沉降的减小作用越明显;水平加筋体拉伸强度越高,这种作用越明显。桩承式加筋路堤三维土拱效应等沉面高度与桩帽净间距之比约为3.5。

关键词: 桩承式加筋路堤受力性状比较复杂, 土拱效应对路堤的承载变形性状具有重要影响。通过三维土拱效应模型试验, 研究桩-土相对位移、路堤高度、桩帽净间距和水平加筋体拉伸强度等因素对桩土应力比及路堤沉降的影响。结果表明:土拱效应发挥程度与桩-土相对位移密切相关, 存在一个临界桩-土相对位移使得桩土应力比达到最大值, 该临界桩-土相对位移约为6~8 mm。路堤高度与桩帽净间距之比越大, 桩土应力比越大, 路堤顶面差异沉降越小;桩帽宽度与桩帽净间距之比越大, 桩土应力比越大, 路堤顶面差异沉降越小。设置水平加筋体能有效提高桩土应力比并减小路堤顶面沉降;路堤越低, 水平加筋体对桩土应力比的提高作用及对路面沉降的减小作用越明显;水平加筋体拉伸强度越高, 这种作用越明显。桩承式加筋路堤三维土拱效应等沉面高度与桩帽净间距之比约为3.5。

Abstract: Soil arching has a notable influence on the behavior of piled reinforced embankment for its mechanically complex nature. A series of 3D model tests are conducted to explore the influence of the pile-soil relative displacement, embankment height, pile-cap spacing and horizontal reinforcement tension strength on the stress concentration ratio as well as the embankment settlement. The test results show that: soil arching is closely related to the pile-soil relative displacement and there exists a critical pile-soil relative displacement of approximate 6 to 8 mm which makes the stress concentration ratio reaching its maximum value. The bigger the ratio of embankment height is to the pile-cap clear spacing, the bigger the stress concentration ratio and the smaller the differential settlement on the surface of the embankment are; a bigger ratio of the cap width to the pile-cap clear spacing will result in a bigger stress concentration ratio and a smaller differential settlement. The installation of horizontal reinforcement within the embankment will effectively increase the stress concentration ratio and decrease the surface settlement; a low embankment as well as high tension strength of the reinforcement will enhance the function of the horizontal reinforcement. The equal settlement plane height is about 3.5 times the pile-cap clear spacing for 3D soil arch in piled reinforced embankments.

Key words: piled reinforced embankment, 3D soil arching, model test, soil stress concentration ratio, equal settlement plane

中图分类号: 

  • U 416.1+2
[1] 张志沛,彭 惠,饶 晓. 软土地基注浆扩散过程数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 652-0655.
[2] 王保田 ,武良金 ,向文俊 ,施接锋 ,吴育琦 . 改良膨胀土筑堤技术研究[J]. , 2005, 26(1): 87-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[2] 刘豆豆,陈卫忠,杨建平,谭贤君,周喜德. 脆性岩石卸围压强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2588 -2594 .
[3] 王桂尧,李 斌,罗 军,付宏渊. 粉土基质吸力的新型量测装置与土-水特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3678 -3682 .
[4] 卢应发,陈朱蕾,谢文良,吕志中. 垃圾卫生填埋中的一些岩土工程技术[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 91 -98 .
[5] 王志萍,胡敏云,夏玲涛. 垃圾填土压缩特性的室内试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1681 -1686 .
[6] 贾 强,应惠清,张 鑫. 锚杆静压桩技术在既有建筑物增设地下空间中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2053 -2057 .
[7] 路军富,王明年,贾媛媛,喻 渝,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道二次衬砌施作时机研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 843 -848 .
[8] 王成华,安建国. 含扩径桩的群桩基础竖向承载性状数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 580 -585 .
[9] 方 焘 ,刘新荣 ,耿大新 ,罗 照 ,纪孝团 ,郑明新 . 大直径变径桩竖向承载特性模型试验研究(I)[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2947 -2952 .
[10] 胡万雨 ,陈向浩 ,林 江 ,况磊强 . 瀑布沟水电站砾石土心墙初次蓄水期原位钻孔渗流试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1259 -1263 .