›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1885-1891.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和残积土的土-水特征曲线试验及模拟

陈东霞1, 2,龚晓南2   

  1. 1. 厦门大学 建筑与土木工程学院,福建 厦门 361005;2. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-26 出版日期:2014-07-10 发布日期:2014-07-11
  • 作者简介:陈东霞,女,1976年生,博士生,主要从事残积土工程特性及非饱和土力学工程应用的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51209180)。

Experiment and modeling of soil-water characteristic curve of unsaturated residual soil

CHEN Dong-xia1, 2,GONG Xiao-nan2   

  1. 1. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China; 2. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Received:2013-12-26 Online:2014-07-10 Published:2014-07-11

摘要: 土-水特征曲线是指基质吸力与含水率或饱和度的关系曲线。土-水特征及其相关数学模型可用于非饱和土性质如渗透系数和抗剪强度模型的建立。通常,土-水特征曲线仅有脱湿曲线。笔者详细讨论了初始含水率、干密度、竖向应力及干湿循环对脱湿曲线的影响。采用滤纸法测试了厦门地区残积土的土-水特征曲线(SWCC)及滞回环。结果表明,初始含水率对SWCC影响较小,最优含水率干侧试样SWCC的进气值小,滞回环小;湿侧试样的进气值大,滞回环大;最优含水率试样的滞回环居中。初始干密度对SWCC有显著影响,低干密度试样SWCC进气值小,脱湿速率快;高干密度试样SWCC进气值高,脱湿速率低。滞回环的大小随着初始干密度的减小而增大。不同竖向应力下SWCC变化较大。随着竖向应力的增加,进气值增大,脱湿速率减小,滞回环减小并趋于稳定。第1次干湿循环对SWCC影响最大,随着循环次数的增加,进气值减小,滞回环减小并趋于稳定。由于残积砂质黏性土SWCC的过渡区和残余区不易区分,残余含水率难以确定,因此,提出5种剔除残余含水率参数的修正SWCC模型,计算分析得出,修正Gardner模型最适合厦门地区残积土的SWCC建模。

关键词: 基质吸力, 土-水特征曲线, 土-水特征曲线模型, 残积土

Abstract: The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) is defined as the relationship between the suction and the water content or degree of saturation. The soil-water characteristics and related mathematical models can be used to model the unsaturated soil properties such as the permeability and the shear strength. Conventionally, only the drying soil-water characteristic curve of soil is determined. In this work, the influences of initial water content, initial dry density, the vertical stress and drying and wetting cycles are examined and discussed in detail. The SWCCs and hysteresis loops of residual soils in Xiamen were obtained by the filter paper method. The results show that the initial water content has negligible effect on SWCCs. The specimen at the wet of optimum moisture content (OMC) has the higher air entry value and the larger hysteresis loop than that of the soil specimen at the dry of OMC. The specimen with OMC lies between them. While, the initial dry density has considerable influence on SWCCs. The specimen at lower initial dry density exhibits smaller air entry value and higher rate of desorption than that of the specimen at higher initial dry density. The size of hysteresis loop decreases as the initial dry density increases. The specimens subjected to different vertical stresses have different SWCCs. The higher the applied load on the specimen, the higher the air entry value, the higher the rate of desorption, the smaller the size of hysteresis loop. In the drying and wetting process, the size of hysteresis loop has been substantially affected by the first drying and wetting cycle. With the increasing of drying and wetting cycle, the air entry value and the size of hysteresis hoop decrease. Since the features of soil-water characteristic of sandy clay are not well defined especially for the residual state of saturation, which desaturates continuously without a distinct break point, the residual suction or residual water content, one of the key parameters in the mathematical models of SWCC, is not well defined. As a result five improved models without the residual water content are proposed to describe the SWCCs of residual soil. The improved Gardner model has been found to be the most suitable model for all SWCCs of the residual sandy clay in Xiamen.

Key words: matric suction, soil-water characteristic curve(SWCC), SWCC models, residual soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 449
[1] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[2] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[3] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[4] 蔡雨, 徐林荣, 周德泉, 邓超, 冯晨曦, . 自平衡与传统静载试桩法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3011-3018.
[5] 洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[6] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[7] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[8] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[9] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[10] 丁瑜, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 贾羽, . 风化红砂岩残积土路基瞬态饱和区动态水压力 特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4740-4750.
[11] 包小华, 廖志广, 徐长节, 庞小朝, 谢雄耀, 崔宏志, . 不同渗流边界条件下粉砂边坡失稳模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3789-3796.
[12] 郭林坪,孔令伟,徐 超,杨爱武,. 厦门花岗岩残积土物理力学指标关联性定量表征初探[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 175-180.
[13] 张晨阳,张 明,张泰丽,孙 强,杨 龙,. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[14] 陶高梁,李 进,庄心善,肖衡林,崔惜琳,徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[15] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[3] 张 波,李术才,杨学英,王锡平. 三维黏弹性人工边界地震波动输入方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 774 -778 .
[4] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[5] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[6] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[7] 王云岗 ,章 光 ,胡 琦. 斜桩基础受力特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[8] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[9] 宋义敏 ,姜耀东 ,马少鹏 ,杨小彬 ,赵同彬 . 岩石变形破坏全过程的变形场和能量演化研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1352 -1356 .
[10] 夏艳华 ,白世伟 . 基于水平集的复杂三维地层模型建模及在地下工程中的应用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1445 -1450 .