›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 2163-2170.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

劈裂砂岩有、无砂粒填充条件下的多因素对渗流量影响对比分析

刘 杰,李建林,胡 静,蔡 健,赵宗勇   

  1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-24 出版日期:2014-08-12 发布日期:2014-08-14
  • 作者简介:刘杰,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程和水工结构方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)(No.2012CB426502);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51279091);中国水利水电科学研究院流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室开放研究基金项目(No. IWHR-SKL-2012221);宜昌市科学技术研究与开发项目(No. A2012-302-03)。

Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers

LIU Jie, LI Jian-lin, HU Jing, CAI Jian, ZHAO Zong-yong   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservior Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2014-01-24 Online:2014-08-12 Published:2014-08-14

摘要: 采用宜昌劈裂砂岩,在有、无砂岩填充条件下,分别从轴压、围压、劈裂面面积、凹凸高差、迹线长度、劈裂面2D投影面积、进出口长度、结构面粗糙度对渗流量的影响规律进行了对比分析。研究结果表明:有、无砂粒填充下轴压与渗流量均呈线性递增关系;无填充时围压与渗流量呈对数递减关系,有充填时围压与渗流量呈线性关系;无充填时渗流量与流面积呈三次函数关系,而充填后过流面积对渗流量几乎无影响;凹凸高差、2D面积与渗流量的关系也有相似规律,分析认为,这主要是砂粒充填后带来的过流通道要远大于上述三因素对过流通道的改变;无充填时,渗流量随迹线长度线性递减,有填充时该规律被淹没;无论有、无填充,渗流量与过流面粗糙度系数在一定范围内均呈现二次函数关系。这些规律能指导渗流测量时各因素的优先次序,可有效减少对次要影响因素的测量工作,同时可对渗流的数值模拟提供参考。

关键词: 劈裂砂岩, 渗流量, 凹凸高差, 节理粗糙度系数

Abstract: Taking the splitting sandstone from Yichang as the research object, the paper respectively studies about seepage flow variation rules caused by axial compressions, confining pressures, splitting surface area, concave-convex height different, trace length, 2D projected area of splitting surface, import and export length and joint roughness. The results suggest that the axial compression and seepage flow are in linear increasing relation whether the specimen is filled or not; confining pressures and seepage flow are in a relationship of logarithmic decrement when the specimen is unfilled, while in linear relation as the specimen is filled. Under non-filler condition, the seepage area has a cubic function to the seepage velocity, while there is no influence under filling condition, and at the same time, the concave-convex height difference, 2D projected area have the same rule with seepage velocity. Analysis suggests that the influence on seepage passages of the three factors is far from that caused by fillers; under non-filler condition, the trace length reduces linearly with the seepage velocity; the joint roughness coefficient shows a quadratic functional relationship with the seepage flow whether the specimen is filled or not. These rules can guide the priorities of factors in the seepage measurement, and effectively reduce the measurement of those secondary factors and provide a reference for numerical simulation of seepage.

Key words: splitting sandstone, seepage flow, concave-convex height different, joint roughness coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451
[1] 杨圣奇,陆家炜,田文岭,唐劲舟,. 不同节理粗糙度类岩石材料三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 21-32.
[2] 宋磊博,江 权,李元辉,杨成祥,冉曙光,王百林,刘 挺,. 基于剪切行为结构面形貌特征的描述[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 525-533.
[3] 王昌硕,王亮清,葛云峰,梁 烨,孙自豪,董曼曼,张 楠. 基于统计参数的二维节理粗糙度系数非线性确定方法[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 565-573.
[4] 刘 杰,李建林,赵宗勇,肖 蕾,蔡 健. 不同填充及加载路径下劈裂砂岩渗流特性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 45-0052.
[5] 许建聪,郭书太. 地下水封油库围岩地下水渗流量计算[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1295-1302.
[6] 黄润秋,徐德敏. 岩石(体)渗透性测试的体变量法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2961-2964.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙树林,李 方,谌 军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[2] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[3] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[4] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[5] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 陈立文,孙德安. 不同应力路径下水土耦合超固结黏土分叉分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2922 -2928 .
[9] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .