›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 565-573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.033

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于统计参数的二维节理粗糙度系数非线性确定方法

王昌硕,王亮清,葛云峰,梁 烨,孙自豪,董曼曼,张 楠   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉430074
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-23 出版日期:2017-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 王亮清,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性与地质灾害防治的教学与科研工作。E-mail: wlq027@126.com E-mail:wcshuo@126.com
  • 作者简介:王昌硕,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体工程性质与稳定性方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41372310);中国博士后基金项目(No. 2015M570671);中国地质大学(武汉)中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(No. 1610491T07)。

A nonlinear method for determining two-dimensional joint roughness coefficient based on statistical parameters

WANG Chang-shuo, WANG Liang-qing, GE Yun-feng, LIANG Ye, SUN Zi-hao, DONG Man-man, ZHANG Nan   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2016-02-23 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372310), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2015M570671) and the Fundamental Research Funds for National University, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan)(1610491T07).

摘要: 岩体节理粗糙度系数JRC与其统计参数之间具有复杂的非线性关系,单一统计参数因存在对结构面形貌描述的片面性,从而导致JRC计算结果的可靠性较低。从结构面起伏角、起伏高度及其分布特征的角度选取了平均起伏角 、平均相对起伏度 、起伏角标准偏差 和起伏高度标准偏差 4个参数共同反映结构面形貌。以已知JRC试验反算值的102条结构面剖面线作为样本数据对支持向量机进行训练,构建JRC与所选取的统计参数之间的非线性映射关系,建立了JRC支持向量回归(SVR)预测模型,并通过Barton标准剖面线的JRC预测值与试验反算值的对比证明了模型的可靠性。以三峡库区秭归县马家沟滑坡所处地层岩体结构面为例,基于三维激光扫描试验获取了其表面形貌数据并建立了三维形貌模型,开展室内直剪试验反算得到了其JRC。实例JRC的计算结果表明,SVR模型预测结果与试验反算值的相对误差仅为4.5%,不同统计参数回归关系式对于相同剖面线的估算结果存在较大差异,表明基于所选取的统计参数,采用SVR模型预测得到的JRC更加可靠。该方法为JRC的定量确定提供了新思路。

关键词: 结构面, 统计参数, 节理粗糙度系数, 支持向量机, 三维激光扫描

Abstract: There is a complex nonlinear relationship between rock joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and the statistical parameters. And JRC value calculated using single statistical parameter is not reliable, since the description is one-sided on the morphology of discontinuity surface. Four parameters, average inclination angle , average relative amplitude , standard deviation of inclination angle and standard deviation of amplitude , are selected to describe the morphology of discontinuity surface. The training samples containing 102 profiles with available experimental back-calculated JRC values are chosen to establish the nonlinear relationship between JRC and the selected statistical parameters, then a JRC support vector regression (SVR) prediction model is established. The SVR model is proved to be reliable by comparing the predicted and experimental back-calculated JRC of Barton standard profiles. The discontinuities of Majiagou landslide in Zigui county, Three Gorges Reservoir Region are selected as a case. Three-dimensional laser scanning test is conducted to obtain the morphology data of discontinuity surface and a 3D model of discontinuity surface morphology is developed. Direct shear test is carried out to back calculate its JRC. The results show that JRC predicted by the SVR model and experimental back-calculated value have good consistency, and the relative error is only 4.5%. The JRC estimation results by different regression equations based on statistical parameters for the same profile have larger variation, which indicates that the JRC predicted by SVR model based on the chosen statistical parameters is more reliable. The results may also provide a new approach to quantitatively determine JRC.

Key words: discontinuities, statistical parameter, joint roughness coefficient, support vector machine, three-dimensional laser scanning

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 陈庆发, 杨承业, 尹庭昌, 王宇, . 金属矿山矿块单元结构体组合关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 74-82.
[2] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[3] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[4] 侯钦宽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 徐敏娜, 曹泽敏. 结构面粗糙度统计测量最小样本数确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1259-1269.
[5] 崔学杰, 晏鄂川, 陈 武. 基于改进遗传算法的岩体结构面产状聚类分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 374-380.
[6] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[7] 许江, 邬君宇, 刘义鑫, 雷娇, . 不同充填度下岩体剪切−渗流耦合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3416-3424.
[8] 阮永芬, 高春钦, 刘克文, 贾荣谷, 丁海涛, . 基于粒子群算法优化小波支持向量机的 岩土力学参数反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3662-3669.
[9] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[10] 许 江, 瞿佳美, 刘义鑫, 彭守建, 王 威, 吴善康, . 循环剪切荷载作用下充填物对结构面 剪切特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1627-1637.
[11] 郑青松, 刘恩龙, 刘明星, . 三轴试验下结构面倾角对制备岩样力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1854-1861.
[12] 朱仁杰, 车爱兰, 严 飞, 文 海, 葛修润, . 含贯通性结构面岩质边坡动力演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1907-1915.
[13] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[14] 许江, 雷娇, 刘义鑫, 邬君宇, . 充填物性质影响结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4129-4137.
[15] 葛云峰, 钟鹏, 唐辉明, 赵斌滨, 王亮清, 夏丁, 仇雅诗, 李鹏飞, 张莉, 闻炼, 曹天赐, . 基于钻孔图像的岩体结构面几何信息智能测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4467-4476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!