›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 2464-2472.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

风化岩地基全螺纹玻璃纤维增强聚合物抗浮锚杆承载特征现场试验

白晓宇1,张明义1,刘 鹤2,寇海磊1   

  1. 1.青岛理工大学 土木工程学院,山东 青岛 266033;2.青岛市户外广告与亮化管理办公室,山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-24 出版日期:2014-09-10 发布日期:2014-09-16
  • 通讯作者: 张明义,男,1958年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学及地基基础的试验、教学和研究工作。E-mail: zmy58@163.com E-mail:baixiaoyu538@163.com
  • 作者简介:白晓宇,男,1984年生,博士研究生,主要从事地基基础及地下工程领域的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51278261);教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(No. 20133721110003)。

Field test on load-bearing characteristics of full-thread GFRP anti-floating anchor in weathered rock site

BAI Xiao-yu1, ZHANG Ming-yi1, LIU He2, KOU Hai-lei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao Technological University, Qingdao, Shandong 266033, China; 2. Outdoor Advertising and Lighting Management Office of Qingdao, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China
  • Received:2013-05-24 Online:2014-09-10 Published:2014-09-16

摘要: 玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)抗浮锚杆是一种由树脂和玻璃纤维复合而成的新型材料,与传统的钢筋锚杆相比,它具有比强度高、耐腐蚀性强和抗电磁干扰能力强的优点。基于6根GFRP抗浮锚杆和4根钢筋抗浮锚杆现场足尺拉拔破坏性试验,研究了中风化花岗岩中GFRP抗浮锚杆的承载特征和界面黏结特性。试验结果表明,抗浮锚杆的破坏形式有2种:锚杆和砂浆界面剪切破坏,砂浆和围岩界面剪切破坏。直径为28 mm 的GFRP抗浮锚杆和钢筋抗浮锚杆的极限抗拔承载力均为225 kN,直径为32 mm GFRP抗浮锚杆极限抗拔承载力为250 kN,能够满足工程实际需要;GFRP抗浮锚杆与砂浆(第一界面)的平均黏结强度为1.50~1.54 MPa;GFRP抗浮锚杆砂浆与围岩(第二界面)的平均黏结强度为0.32~0.37 MPa,略低于钢筋抗浮锚杆第二界面的平均黏结强度;直径为32 mm的GFRP抗浮锚杆第二界面平均黏结强度高于直径为28 mm的GFRP抗浮锚杆。在此基础上,进一步分析论证了GFRP抗浮锚杆的破坏机制,为GFRP抗浮锚杆的工程应用提供了理论依据。

关键词: 中风化花岗岩, 全螺纹GFRP抗浮锚杆, 极限抗拔承载力, 第一界面, 第二界面

Abstract: The glass fiber reinforced plastics(GFRP) anti-floating anchor is one kind of new materials which bonds by the resin and the glass fiber. Compared with the steel bar anchor rod, it has the high specific strength, nonelectric conductivity, nonmagnetic nature and corrosion resistance. Based on the full-scale drawing destructive field tests of six GFRP anti-floating anchor and four steel bolts, the load-bearing characteristics and interface bond properties of GFRP anti-floating anchor in moderately weathered granite are studied. By the test results, several conclusions are drawn: (1) There are two failure modes of anti-floating anchor as follows: shear failure between the anchorage rod and grout; and shear failure between the grout and surrounding rock mass. (2) Under the condition of M32.5 grout and the anchorage length with 2.0 m, ultimate anti-lifting bearing capacity of GFRP anti-floating anchor and steel bolt with diameter of 28 mm are 225 kN, ultimated anti-lifting bearing capacity of GFRP anti-floating anchors with diameter of 32 mm is 250 kN, which can be satisfied with engineering demands. (3) The average bond strength between GFRP anti-floating anchor and grout (the first interface) is 1.50-1.54 MPa; (4) The average bond strength between the grout and surrounding rock mass (the second interface) is 0.32-0.37 MPa, which is slightly lower than the average bond strength of the second interface of steel bolt; (5) The average bond strength of the second interface of GFRP anti-floating anchor with diameter of 32 mm is higher than GFRP anti-floating anchor with diameter of 28 mm. According to the test results, the probable failure form and mechanism of GFRP anti-floating anchor are further analyzed. The research results can provide theoretical basis for application of GFRP anti-floating anchor.

Key words: moderately weathered granite, full-thread GFRP anti-floating anchor, ultimate anti-lifting bearing capacity, first interface;second interface

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[2] 贺建清,肖 兰,张文勇,高文华,. 基于改进的Mohr-Coulomb强度准则下岩石锚杆极限抗拔承载力计算[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2484-2488.
[3] 张 琰,郑卫锋,朱照清. 用于砂岩加固的锚杆的承载性能试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 367-371.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[6] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[7] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[8] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[9] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .
[10] 唐世斌,唐春安,李连崇,张永彬. 湿度扩散诱发的隧洞时效变形数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 697 -0703 .