›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 2017-2024.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

颗粒运移对蒋家沟土体渗透性影响的试验研究

王志兵,汪 稔,胡明鉴,陈能远,吕士展   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-02 出版日期:2011-07-10 发布日期:2011-06-30
  • 作者简介:王志兵,男,1982年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50709035);中科院院长奖获得者科研启动专项基金(No. 09120111A01)

Effects of particle transport characteristics on permeability of soils from Jiangjiagou ravine

WANG Zhi-bing,WANG Ren,HU Ming-jian,CHEN Neng-yuan,LÜ Shi-zhan   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2010-11-02 Online:2011-07-10 Published:2011-06-30

摘要: 对蒋家沟流域泥石流源区两种分散性不同的土(G1土具有强分散性,G2土无分散性)进行室内土柱自滤试验,研究了土柱在常水头(水头为5 cm)渗流过程中颗粒运移对土柱不同部位渗透性的影响。入渗液采用了煮沸过的清水与浓度为1 g/L的悬浮液(悬浮颗粒的粒径范围为1.6~104.74 μm)。在清水渗流过程中,两种土样的入口处土层渗透性随着时间而增大,出口处土层的渗透性先增大后减少。在悬浮液渗流过程中,两种土的各土层的渗透性都有下降趋势,但在入口处土层最为显著,G1土样下降了一个数量级以上,G2下降了近两个数量级,且G2土所用时间较G1土短,即G2土的渗透性减少速率更加明显;两土柱中渗透流量都有显著减少。研究表明:土体的分散性在颗粒运移过程逐渐占主导地位,即强分散性土自身颗粒的运移明显,能抵消一部分外来颗粒的积聚堵塞作用。从试验结束后土柱的外观图像观察也发现,入渗的悬浮颗粒在土柱的各个位置都有分布,但主要沉积在入口处,这与土柱各层渗透性的变化相吻合。此外,两种土流失的颗粒都只是集中于渗流的开始阶段,流失颗粒粒径范围集中在数微米至数十微米之间

关键词: 泥石流, 颗粒, 运移, 堵塞, 渗透性

Abstract: Permeability variations of two types of soils (G1 soil with high dispersibility, G2 without) from debris flow source area in Jiangjiagou ravine (Yunnan province) due to fine particles transport were evaluated under constant head condition (the constant pressure head is 5 cm) in soils column. Boiled tap water and suspension of 1 g/L particles (the size range: 1.6-104.74 μm) was successively used as inflow water for both soil column experiments. During the stage of boiled tap water seepage flow, permeability coefficient of both the soil layers near the inlet of the column decrease, while that of both the soil layers near the outlet of the column first increased, then decreased. During the stage of particles suspension seepage flow, permeability coefficient of both the soil layers along the column decreased; and the most severe decreases of permeability occurred near the inlet of the columns. The permeability coefficient of soil G1 reduced by more than one order of magnitude; the permeability coefficient of soil G2 reduced by about two orders of magnitude; and the amount of time spent reaching those values in soil G2 was less than in soil G1. That is the rate of the decrease of permeability coefficient in soil G2 was more than in soil G1. Flow rate for both soils significantly decreased in this stage. The results show that the dispersion played a leading role in the seepage process. In other words, the process of itself particles release and transport can affect the pore concentration and offset the clogging effect induced by the deposition of the foreign particles. After the experiments, the pore space of both the soil layers near the inlet of the columns were almost filled by the foreign particles, and the filling rate gradually decreased along the column by observed with the naked eye, which was in agreement with the results of the permeability coefficient decrease of the soils along the column. In addition, the mass loss of particles only occurred in the first several tens of minutes, and the sizes of the loss particles from the two soils fell within the same range of 1–100 μm

Key words: debris flow, fine particles, transport, clogging, permeability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军 , 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[2] 彭家奕, 张家发, 沈振中, 叶加兵, . 颗粒形状对粗粒土孔隙特征和渗透性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 592-600.
[3] 杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透 特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[4] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[5] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[6] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[7] 周梦佳, 温彦锋, 邓刚, 王蕴嘉, 宋二祥, . 堆石料单颗粒劈裂试验破碎强度随机性与 尺寸效应的三维离散元模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 503-510.
[8] 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 闫宪洋, . 黏土岩饱和过程中水分运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3327-3334.
[9] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[10] 李玲, 刘金泉, 刘造保, 刘桃根, 王伟, 邵建富, . 砂-黏土混合物高压压实性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3502-3514.
[11] 孙博, 杨怀德, 谷玲, 刘跃, 唐碧华, 赵桂连, 张连明. 基于UDEC颗粒模型的不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3679-3688.
[12] 沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[13] 胡明鉴, 崔 翔, 王新志, 刘海峰, 杜 韦, . 细颗粒对钙质砂渗透性的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2925-2930.
[14] 毛小龙, 刘月田, 关文龙, 任兴南, 冯月丽, 丁祖鹏, . 一种适用于孔隙体积应变的有效应力方程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3004-3010.
[15] 张凌凯, 王睿, 张建民, 唐新军, . 考虑颗粒破碎效应的堆石料静动力本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2547-2554.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .