›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1306-1312.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

天津滨海新区浅层超软土加固技术现场对比试验

董志良,周 琦,张功新,邱青长,罗 彦,李 燕   

  1. 中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广州 510230
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-01 出版日期:2012-05-10 发布日期:2012-05-14
  • 作者简介:董志良,男,1965年生,博士,教授级高工,主要从事软基处理、环境岩土工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    科技部科研院所技术开发研究专项资金项目(No. 2008EG124222,No. 2009EG124217,No. 2010EG124227)。

Field comparison test of reinforcement technology of shallow ultra-soft soil in Tianjin Binhai New Area

DONG Zhi-liang, ZHOU Qi, ZHANG Gong-xin, QIU Qing-chang, LUO Yan, LI Yan   

  1. CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510230, China
  • Received:2010-11-01 Online:2012-05-10 Published:2012-05-14

摘要: 分析天津滨海新区浅层超软土加固处理存在的问题,提出常规方案、单排单管方案和单排单管加密方案。依托天津滨海新区某工程,开展现场对比试验。结合各种监测检测成果,对比分析3种方案加固效果,并提出进一步优化改进建议。工程实践表明,经过3种方案加固处理,吹填淤泥表层会形成具有一定强度和厚度的硬壳层,土体物理力学性质明显改善,均能满足后续吹填砂垫层和机械插板的施工要求。另外,单排单管方案和加密方案加固效果明显优于常规方案,尤其有利于硬壳层厚度的形成。从长远加固效果角度出发,单排单管方案及加密方案更可取。

关键词: 吹填淤泥, 浅层超软土加固, 常规方案, 单排单管方案, 单排单管加密方案, 硬壳层

Abstract: Some problems of reinforcement of shallow ultra-soft soil in Tianjin Binhai New Area are analysed. Three reinforcement schemes of shallow ultra-soft soil are proposed, including conventional scheme, single-row to single-tube scheme and small spacing scheme. Relying on a project in Tianjin Binhai New Area, field comparison test is carried out. A comparative analysis of the reinforcement effect of three schemes is done with monitoring test results and some further recommendations for reinforcement are provided. Engineering practice shows that, a hard crust with a certain strength and thickness forms after treated by three reinforcement schemes and the physico-mechanical properties of soil are significantly improved, which fully meet the construction requirements of hydraulic fill sand cushion and prefabricated vertical drains. In addition, the reinforcement effects of single-row to single-tube scheme and small spacing scheme are significantly better than that of conventional reinforcement scheme. The first two schemes are beneficial to the formation of hard crust thickness, which are preferable from the point of view of long-term perspective.

Key words: hydraulic mud fill, reinforcement of shallow ultra-soft soil, conventional scheme, single-row to single-tube scheme, small spacing single-row to single-tube scheme, hard crust

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[2] 王 桦 ,卢 正 ,姚海林 ,胡 智 ,董启朋 , . 交通荷载作用下低路堤软土地基硬壳层应力扩散作用研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 164-170.
[3] 鲍树峰,董志良 ,莫海鸿 ,武冬青,. 高黏粒含量新吹填淤泥加固新技术室内研发[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 61-67.
[4] 鲍树峰 ,莫海鸿 ,董志良 ,陈平山 ,邱青长,. 新近吹填淤泥地基负压传递特性及分布模式研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3569-3576.
[5] 吴跃东 ,石晓燕 ,刘 坚 ,刁红国 , . 真空预压加固区硬壳层的水分运移解析解[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 110-114.
[6] 刘青松 ,张春雷 ,汪顺才 ,朱 伟 ,大木宜章,. 淤泥堆场人工硬壳层地基极限承载力室内模拟研究[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 667-670.
[7] 问延煦,周 健,贾敏才. 考虑封闭作用和应力扩散的软土地基临塑荷载[J]. , 2007, 28(8): 1715-1718.
[8] 贾永刚,董好刚,单红仙,刘小丽,刘红军. 黄河三角洲粉质土硬壳层特征及成因研究[J]. , 2007, 28(10): 2029-2035.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周火垚,施建勇. 饱和软黏土中足尺静压桩挤土效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3291 -3296 .
[2] 董 云,何卫忠,孙 蔚. 隔堤填筑路堤的稳定性及变形破坏模式分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2471 -2478 .
[3] 叶 斌,叶冠林,长屋淳一. 采用土工合成材料的新型护岸结构的动态数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 442 -446 .
[4] 高彦斌,崔玉军. 微气候能量分析法在岩土工程分析中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 433 -439 .
[5] 石 崇,徐卫亚,周家文,张金龙. 节理面透射模型及其隔振性能研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 729 -734 .
[6] 庞大鹏,陈剑平,王丹微. 节理网络分形在隧道超前地质预报中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1415 -1420 .
[7] 杨荣伟,程晓辉. 光弹颗粒材料的直剪实验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 103 -109 .
[8] 孙 博,周仲华,张虎元,张永霞,郑 龙. 夯土建筑遗址表面温度变化特征及预报模型[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 867 -871 .
[9] 王松鹤,骆亚生. 复杂应力下黄土蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 43 -47 .
[10] 林 萍 ,叶冠林 ,陈 楠 ,王建华 ,桥本正. 冻结法施工旁通道的冻土压力现场监测方法[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2555 -2560 .