晚更新世黄土渗透性的各向异性及其机制研究

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1313-1318.

晚更新世黄土渗透性的各向异性及其机制研究

梁燕^{1, 2}，邢鲜丽²，李同录²，徐平³，刘树林⁴

1.长安大学公路学院特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室，西安 710064；2.长安大学地质工程与测绘学院，西安 710054； 3.中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司，西安 710075；4.中国有色金属工业西安勘察设计研究院，西安 710054

收稿日期:2011-03-31 出版日期:2012-05-10 发布日期:2012-05-14
作者简介:梁燕，女，1968年生，博士，讲师，主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 40972182）

Study of the anisotropic permeability and mechanism of Q3 loess

LIANG Yan^{1, 2}, XING Xian-li², LI Tong-lu², XU Ping³, LIU Shu-lin⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Education Ministry on Highway Engineering of Special Region, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China; 2. School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China; 3. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China; 4. Xi’an Engineering Investigation and Design Research Institute of China National Nonferrous Metals Industry, Xi’an 710054, China

Received:2011-03-31 Online:2012-05-10 Published:2012-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 非饱和黄土的渗透性是非饱和黄土性质的重要组成部分。研究黄土不同方向的渗透性对确定其湿陷范围和由于水的渗透引起的黄土滑坡具有很重要的理论意义。研究了黄土渗透性的各向异性特征及其机制。以具有明显各向异性的西安Q3原状黄土为研究对象，用TEN型张力计测量了黄土试样不同方向的、不同含水率下的吸力；用变水头渗透试验测量了黄土竖直和水平方向的饱和渗透系数。结果表明，当体积含水率在23%～41%时，张力计沿不同方向插入土样所测吸力相差不大；竖直方向的饱和渗透系数是水平方向的4.02倍。在吸力测量的基础上，根据土-水特征曲线，确定了竖直和水平方向的非饱和黄土的渗透系数。得出在黄土不同方向，随着吸力的增大或减小，渗透系数减小或增大；竖直方向的渗透系数普遍地大于水平方向的渗透系数；当吸力小于57 kPa时，随着吸力的增大，竖向渗透系数与水平向渗透系数的差值减小。通过观测黄土的结构，得出黄土结构对其渗透性有重要影响。

关键词: 原状Q3黄土, 各向异性, 非饱和土, 渗透性, 微观结构, 机制

Abstract: The permeability of unsaturated loess is an important part of its properties. The research on loess permeability in different directions is particularly important to determine the range of loess collapse and the study of loess landslides caused by the infiltration of water in the loess. So, the anisotropic permeability and mechanism of Q3 loess are studied. The test samples are the undisturbed Q3 loess with obvious anisotropy from a building site in Xi’an city. The matrix suctions at different volumetric water contents and in different directions are measured with tensiometer. The saturated hydraulic conductivity is measured by falling head permeability test. The results show, while tensiometer is inserted vertically and paralleling with soil layer into samples, that the suctions are very close as the volumetric water content is between 0.23 and 0.41; and the saturated hydraulic conductivity in vertical direction is 4.02 times as that in horizontal direction. Further, the correlation function between the hydraulic conductivity and suction for unsaturated loess in vertical and horizontal directions is obtained by the soil-water characteristic curve based on the measured suctions. It can be obtained that the hydraulic conductivity reduces/increases with the matrix suction increases/reduces in both directions of the loess. The hydraulic conductivity in vertical is generally higher than that in horizontal. The difference of hydraulic conductivity between vertical and horizontal directions reduces with the matrix suction increases when matrix suction is less than 57 kPa. Structure observation shows that the anisotropy of loess structure has a significant effect on the anisotropic permeability.

Key words: undisturbed Q3 loess, anisotropy, soil moisture, permeability, microstructure, mechanisms

中图分类号:

U 419.1

梁燕，邢鲜丽，李同录，徐平，刘树林 . 晚更新世黄土渗透性的各向异性及其机制研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1313-1318.

LIANG Yan , XING Xian-li , LI Tong-lu , XU Ping , LIU Shu-lin . Study of the anisotropic permeability and mechanism of Q3 loess[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1313-1318.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[2]	徐杰, 周建, 罗凌晖, 余良贵, . 高岭-蒙脱混合黏土渗透各向异性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
[3]	邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[4]	李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[5]	张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, . 卢氏膨胀岩湿胀软化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 561-570.
[6]	程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[7]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[8]	史吏, 胡东东, 蔡袁强, 潘晓东, 孙宏磊, . 增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压实时响应及加固机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[9]	于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[10]	楼烨, 张广清. 压裂液黏度对循环水力压裂影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 109-118.
[11]	范运辉, 朱其志, 倪涛, 张坤, 张振南, . 基于弹性张量离散化的脆延转变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 181-188.
[12]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[13]	刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[14]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[15]	朱雷, 黄润秋, 陈国庆, 严明, . 岩质斜坡中缓倾角破裂系统形成演化的力学模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 53-62.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed