含水率影响下尾矿砂内摩擦角随标贯击数变化研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1340-1344.

含水率影响下尾矿砂内摩擦角随标贯击数变化研究

李志平^{1, 2}，彭振斌¹，肖尊群³，张岳安²

1. 中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院，长沙 410083；2. 化工部长沙设计研究院，长沙 410117；3. 中南大学土木工程学院，长沙 410075

收稿日期:2012-07-17 出版日期:2013-05-10 发布日期:2013-05-14
作者简介:李志平，男，1981年生，博士，工程师，主要从事尾矿坝工程技术方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(No. 2011CB710604)。

Variation of internal friction angle of tailings with standard penetration number under influence of water content

LI Zhi-ping^{1, 2}，PENG Zhen-bin¹，XIAO Zun-qun³，ZHANG Yue-an²

1. School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2. Changsha Design and Research Institute of Ministry of Chemical Industry, Changsha 410017, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

Received:2012-07-17 Online:2013-05-10 Published:2013-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 尾矿砂样品在运输和存放过程中均存在易扰动的特点，但考虑到工程造价以及人力资源等因素，目前在大部分上游式尾矿坝的工程地质勘察中难以建立现场试验室，所得抗剪强度指标与实际情况存在一定误差。针对这种现状，结合某铅锌矿尾矿坝现场试验结果，从现场简易试验获得的含水率和标准贯入击数进行分析，并对基于含水率影响下尾矿砂内摩擦角随标准贯入击数变化规律进行了研究，提出了考虑上覆压力作用下标准贯入击数的修正公式，并推出了用标准贯入击数估算尾矿砂内摩擦角的方法。通过几个实例验证：除当修正后的标准贯入击数N1>8（5%< <20%）情况下以外，该方法均能够有效地估算尾矿砂内摩擦角。研究结果表明，该方法在以后的上游式尾矿堆积坝的工程地质勘察工作中具有较强的应用价值。

关键词: 上游式尾矿坝, 尾矿砂, 含水率, 内摩擦角, 标准贯入击数

Abstract: The tailings sample has characteristics of easily to be disturbed in the process of both transportation and storage. However, limited by human resources as well as project budget, or else factors, it is impossible to establish field laboratory for all upstream tailings dam during their engineering geological exploration, thereby leading to errors between the shear strength index and practical situation. For this reason, an extensive field testing is carried out in a lead-zinc mine tailings dam, the water content and standard penetration number can be easily obtained from field testing; and the internal friction angles of tailings as it changes through standard penetration number under the influence of the water content are studied. Considering the effect of overburden pressure, a amended expressions of standard penetration number is proposed. And using the standard penetration number，a estimation method about the internal friction angle of tailings is deduced; Finally, several examples are given to verify that except for the situation when the amended standard penetration number is N1 >8（5%< <20%），this method can estimate the internal friction angle of tailings sand effectively. The results show that, the method has a high application value in upstream tailings dams’ engineering geological exploration in the future.

Key words: upstream tailings dam, tailings, water content, internal friction angle, standard penetration number

中图分类号:

TU 411

李志平，彭振斌，肖尊群，张岳安 . 含水率影响下尾矿砂内摩擦角随标贯击数变化研究[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1340-1344.

LI Zhi-ping ，PENG Zhen-bin ，XIAO Zun-qun ，ZHANG Yue-an . Variation of internal friction angle of tailings with standard penetration number under influence of water content[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1340-1344.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[2]	闫亚景, 闫永帅, 赵贵章, 张泰丽, 孙强, . 基于高密度电法的天然边坡水分运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2807-2814.
[3]	王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同胶结度断层泥强度参数与含水率关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1657-1662.
[4]	王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[5]	唐建新，腾俊洋，张闯，刘姝, . 层状含水页岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 33-41.
[6]	孙德安，张乾越，张龙，朱赞成，. 高庙子膨润土强度时效性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1191-1196.
[7]	陶高梁，李进，庄心善，肖衡林，崔惜琳，徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[8]	腾俊洋，唐建新，张闯, . 层状含水页岩的抗拉强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1317-1326.
[9]	吴孟桃，刘方成，陈巨龙，陈璐. 含水率对大应变下橡胶砂动剪模量和阻尼比的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 803-814.
[10]	曹亚鹏，文桃，米海珍，周凤玺，杨鹏，. 硫酸盐渍土含水率单次递减条件下的盐胀特性[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 881-888.
[11]	田密, 张帆, 李丽华, . 间接测量数据条件下岩土参数空间变异性定量分析方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4673-4680.
[12]	王国富，曹正龙，路林海，王蓉，王丹，韩帅，. 黄河冲积层静止土压力系数原位测定与分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3900-3906.
[13]	刘寒冰，张互助，王静，. 冻融及含水率对压实黏质土力学性质的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 158-164.
[14]	胡明鉴，蒋航海，崔翔，阮洋，刘海峰，张晨阳,. 钙质砂电导率与相关性问题初探[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 158-162.
[15]	刘德仁，张文清，黄新智，李承成,. 非饱和黄土边坡水热变化过程室内模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 236-240.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed