边坡稳定的非线性有限元分析

›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 2047-2050.

边坡稳定的非线性有限元分析

谭晓慧¹，王建国²，王印³

1. 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院，合肥 230009；2. 合肥工业大学土建工程学院，合肥 230009； 3. 同济大学地下建筑与工程学院，上海 200433

收稿日期:2006-11-17 出版日期:2008-08-11 发布日期:2013-08-02
作者简介:谭晓慧，女，1971年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土力学与工程的教学与研究工作。
基金资助:
安徽省教育厅青年基金项目（No.2005jq1021）；安徽省水利厅科研项目。

Nonlinear finite element analysis of slope stability

TAN Xiao-hui¹, WANG Jian-guo², WANG Yin³

1. School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; 3. School of Underground Architecture and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2006-11-17 Online:2008-08-11 Published:2013-08-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于有限元强度折减法，进行了边坡的弹塑性材料非线性及大变形几何非线性分析，并考虑了边坡的三维变形情况。在有限元分析中采用的是莫尔-库仑理想弹塑性模型，大变形分析采用的是更新的拉格朗日法。均质边坡的算例分析表明，有限元法与简化的毕肖普法的安全系数计算结果具有相同的规律，即安全系数都随着黏聚力及内摩擦角的增加而增加，随着重度的增加而减小，但是，各种有限元法的计算结果都比相应的毕肖普法的解要大，亦即毕肖普法偏于安全。各种方法对应的安全系数由大到小的顺序依次是：三维小变形有限元分析、二维大变形有限元分析、二维小变形有限元分析，简化的毕肖普法，前二者能更好地反映实际的边坡变形情况，二者的安全系数值也十分接近，因而是较好的方法。

关键词: 边坡稳定性, 有限元, 强度折减法, 材料非线性, 几何非线性

Abstract: Based on the strength reduction method of finite element method, the elastoplastic material nonlinearity and large deformation geometrical nonlinearity of the slope are studied; and three dimensional deformation features of the slope are also considered. In the finite element analysis, the realistic elastoplastic model of Mohr-Coulomb is adopted; and the method for describing the large deformation characteristic of the soil is updated Lagrangian method. Through analyzing a homogeneous slope, it’s concluded that there exists the same rule among the results of the finite elements and simplified Bishop method. The rule is that the factor of safety will become large if the cohesion and the internal friction angle become large, and it will become small with the increase of unit weight. However, the results of the finite element methods are always larger than the corresponding value of the simplified Bishop method, which means that the result of simplified Bishop method is inclined to conservative. The decreasing order of the four kinds of results of safety factor is Fs (three dimensional small deformation), Fs (two dimensional large deformation), Fs (two dimensional small deformation) and Fs (simply Bishop Method); among them the first two methods are the best one and their values are very close each other.

Key words: slope stability, finite elements, strength reduction method, material nonlinearity, geometrical nonlinearity

中图分类号:

TU 432

谭晓慧，王建国，王印 . 边坡稳定的非线性有限元分析[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2047-2050.

TAN Xiao-hui , WANG Jian-guo , WANG Yin . Nonlinear finite element analysis of slope stability[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2047-2050.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[2]	周小文, 程力, 周密, 王齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[3]	吴顺川, 马骏, 程业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[4]	余国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[5]	梅慧浩, 冷伍明, 聂如松, 刘文劼, 伍晓伟, . 重载铁路路基面动应力峰值随机分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1603-1613.
[6]	邱敏, 袁青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[7]	郑安兴, 罗先启, 陈振华, . 基于扩展有限元法的岩体水力劈裂耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.
[8]	王之东, 黎立云, 陈滔, 刘兵权, . 矿柱岩爆模型试验中能量释放研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[9]	王忠瑾, 方鹏飞, 谢新宇, 王奎华, 王文军, 李金柱, . 带肋竹节桩竖向抗压承载力影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 381-388.
[10]	周雄雄, 迟世春, 贾宇峰, 谢芸菲, . 高土石坝填筑过程的精细化模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 443-450.
[11]	代仲海，胡再强，尹小涛，吴振君，. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[12]	魏匡民，陈生水，李国英，吴俊杰, . 陡峻河谷高面板坝坝体与坝基接触效应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
[13]	李志远，李建波，林皋，韩泽军，. 基于子结构法的成层场地中沉积河谷的散射分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3453-3460.
[14]	郑安兴，罗先启，. 危岩水力劈裂分析的扩展有限元法[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3461-3468.
[15]	宋佳，古泉，许成顺，杜修力，. 饱和土动力方程全显式有限元法在 OpenSees中的实现与应用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3477-3485.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed