石灰稳定红黏土强度的长期碳化效应

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 73-79.

石灰稳定红黏土强度的长期碳化效应

谈云志¹，喻波¹，郑爱¹，付伟²，张华¹，万智³

1. 三峡大学三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室，湖北宜昌443002；2. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司，武汉 430056； 3. 湖南省交通科学研究院，长沙 410015

收稿日期:2012-12-10 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:谈云志，男，1979年生，博士，副教授，主要从事特殊土土力学方面的教学与科研工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助（No.51009084）；湖南省交通运输厅科技进步与创新计划资助（No.200910，No.201045）

Long-term carbonated effect on strength of lime stabilized laterite soils

TAN Yun-zhi¹，YU Bo¹，ZHENG Ai¹，FU Wei²，ZHANG Hua¹，WAN Zhi³

1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards in Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. China Commnnications Construction Corporation Second Highway Consulfans, Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430056, China; 3. Hunan Communications Research Institute, Changsha 410015, China

Received:2012-12-10 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 碳化效应是石灰稳定土强度增长机理之一，但长期的碳化作用是否对其强度一直起促进作用？如果没有压实作用，碳化效果到底如何？这些关键问题还没有得到充分的论证。采用灰土拌和后击实养护和养护后再击实的不同制样方法，通过承载比CBR试验，探讨压实作用对碳化效应的影响。制备4种初始含水率的击实试样，开展碳酸溶液和纯水浸泡下的CBR试验，论证长期碳化对石灰稳定土强度的作用效果。结果表明，自然养护90 d后再击实试样的CBR值明显低于击实后养护的试样；初始含水率为34%时前者约为后者的12倍。另外，碳酸溶液浸泡15 d后的试样CBR值均小于纯水浸泡的试样CBR值，但初始含水率越大其影响程度越小，当初始含水率大于34%后两者之间的强度基本没有差别。为进一步佐证长期碳化作用能弱化石灰稳定土的强度，开展不同浸泡时间的无侧限抗压强度试验，发现石灰土的强度呈现先增大后减少的变化趋势，再次证实长期的碳化作用弱化石灰稳定土的强度。最后，利用热重分析法测试经过碳酸溶液浸泡前后的石灰稳定土，发现长期碳化溶解了部分石灰土中的碳酸钙和硅酸盐类胶结物。借助扫描电镜图片和孔隙尺寸分布曲线，从微观角度揭示不同击实和养护方式对石灰稳定土强度的影响机制。

关键词: 石灰稳定土, 碳化效应, 长期作用, 红黏土

Abstract: Carbonation is one of the strength enhanced mechanism for lime stabilized soil. But there has many major problems need solution. For example, whether the long-term carbonation is always beneficial to its strength? If limed soil were not compacted tightly, how about was the carbonated effect of it? So, California bearing ratio CBR tests were performed to evaluated the influence of compacted degree on carbonated effect by preparation samples under curing before and after compacted conditional. And also, CBR tests were carried out to prove the long-term carbonation effect on the strength of lime stabilized soil by analyzing the strength variation of four kinds of initial water contents compacted specimens which were under immersion in carbonate solution and pure water separately. The results show that the CBR values of sample compacted after natural curing 90 days are significantly lower the strength of samples which compacted before curing, when their initial moisture content is 34.0%; the former CBR are about 12 times as the later ones. And, the CBR of samples immersion in carbonic acid solution 15 days are less than pure water immersion ones. But, the higher initial water content is, the smaller the influence is. For example, the initial moisture content is greater than 34.0%, the CBR values are obviously difference between them. In addition, it carried out unconfined compressive strength test under different soaking times, the results further evidence that long-term carbonation can reduce the strength of stabilized soil. Finally, thermo-gravimetric analysis tests are performed to the limed soil to determine the content of calcium carbonate and to evaluate whether or not there are degradation and migration after soaking in carbonate solution. And, it reveals the effect mechanism of different compactions and curing methods on the strength of lime stabilization by scanning electron microscopy photographs and pore size distribution curves.

Key words: lime stabilized soil, carbonated effect, long-term effect, laterite soil

中图分类号:

TU 443

谈云志，喻波，郑爱，付伟，张华，万智 . 石灰稳定红黏土强度的长期碳化效应[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 73-79.

TAN Yun-zhi ，YU Bo ，ZHENG Ai ，FU Wei ，ZHANG Hua ，WAN Zhi . Long-term carbonated effect on strength of lime stabilized laterite soils[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 73-79.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	谈云志, 胡焱, 邓永锋, 曹玲, 左清军, 明华军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰抑制红黏土收缩的行为与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4213-4219.
[2]	孙德安，何家浩，高游. 广吸力范围内压实红黏土的强度特性[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 51-56.
[3]	程允，韦昌富，牛庚，. 干湿循环作用对岩溶区红黏土剪切强度的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 191-196.
[4]	王家全，刘垒雷，朱庆盛，张昊,. 红黏土地层静压闭口管桩残余应力模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1878-1886.
[5]	穆坤，孔令伟，张先伟，尹松. 红黏土工程性状的干湿循环效应试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2247-2253.
[6]	白冰，赵晓龙，许韬. 多级升温及降温引起的饱和红黏土的热响应试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 25-32.
[7]	李志勇，董城，邹静蓉，邹维列,. 湘南地区红黏土动态回弹模量试验与预估模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1840-1846.
[8]	谈云志，喻波，刘云，左清军，胡莫珍，郑爱. 重塑石灰土的强度恢复方法与机制初探[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 633-639.
[9]	谈云志，喻波，刘晓玲，万智，汪洪星，. 压实红黏土失水收缩过程的孔隙演化规律[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 369-375.
[10]	谈云志，胡新江，喻波，刘晓玲，万智，张振华,. 压实红黏土的恒体积膨胀力与细观机制研究[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 653-658.
[11]	言志信，张刘平，江平，段建，任志华 , . 锚固上覆红黏土岩体边坡的地震动力响应[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 753-758.
[12]	孙德安，刘文捷，吕海波,. 桂林红黏土的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3345-3351.
[13]	孙志亮，郭爱国，太俊. 膨胀土与红黏土石灰改性对比试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 150-155.
[14]	傅鑫晖，韦昌富，颜荣涛，张芹，赖友华，. 非饱和红黏土的强度特性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 204-209.
[15]	谈云志，郑爱，吴翩，付伟 . 红黏土承载比的土团尺寸效应研究[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1242-1246.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed