陡坡水库大坝渗透稳定性及渗透变形分析

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 1305-1311.

陡坡水库大坝渗透稳定性及渗透变形分析

罗长军¹，胡峰²，张磊奇²，王会午³

1. 华中科技大学水电与数字化工程学院，武汉430074；2. 河南省南阳市水利建筑勘测设计院，南阳473057； 3. 河南省南阳市水利局，南阳 473057

收稿日期:2004-11-10 出版日期:2006-08-10 发布日期:2013-11-26
作者简介:罗长军，男，1963年生，工学学士，副教授，主要从事工程勘察和岩土工程设计与治理等工作
基金资助:
河南大学自然科学基金重点项目（No. XK03ZDJZ161）

Analysis of seepage stability and deformation of dam for Doupo Reservoir

LUO Chang-jun¹, HU Feng², ZHANG Lei-qi², WANG Hui-wu³

1. College of Hydropower & Digital Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. Nanyang Hydraulic Construction Surveying and Designing Institute, Nanyang 473057, China; 3. Nanyang Water Resources Bureau, Nanyang 473057, China

Received:2004-11-10 Online:2006-08-10 Published:2013-11-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 陡坡水库存在大坝质量差、坝体发育大量裂缝、背水坡出现散浸现象、坝后沼泽化并形成一上升泉以及排水渠和鱼池有絮状析出物、渗漏量增大等问题，这些异常现象都是由坝体及坝基渗流引起的。在阐述坝体和坝基地质、水文地质条件情况下，分析了大坝渗漏成因及大坝的渗透稳定性，指出坝体实际浸润线及坝体渗漏量是不正常的，特别是1987年后当库水位高于194 m，同一库水位呈上升趋势，这是反常的。坝基实际渗漏量异常，存在管涌和接触冲刷问题，尤其库水位低至 193.84 m，坝后上升泉仍有沙沸现象。上述现象表明大坝渗流是危险的，并分析了散浸、析出物、上升泉及沼泽化、坝肩及绕坝渗漏等现象的成因。

关键词: 坝体, 坝基, 渗漏量, 渗透稳定性, 渗透变形, 陡坡水库

Abstract: Some questions such as disqualification dam, many cracks in developing dam body, disperse-impregnation in the downstream slope of dam, forming ascending spring owing to marshization in dam back, wadding educts coming from drainage ditch and rearing pond and a lot of seepage amount were occurred. These abnormal phenomena were brought by the seepages in the body and foundation of dam. On the circumstances of describing the dam body, foundation geological and hydrogeological conditions, cause of formation of the dam seepage and seepage stability of the dam were analyzed. It is pointed out that the actual saturation line and seepage amount of dam body were abnomal. Especially, the reservoir level was beyond 194 m after 1987, that compared with beforetime, it was abnomal that the identical reservoir level tended to go up. The actual seepage quantity of the dam foundation was unconventional, there were the questions of piping of the highly permeable layer and contact erosion, especially, the reservoir level was under 193.84 m, sand boil in ascending spring behind dam appears. Therefore, the seepage of dam was dangerous. The reasons of formation of dispersed-impregnation and exudates in dam, ascending spring, marshization, the seepage of shoulder and by-pass dam were analyzed.

Key words: dam body, dam foundation, seepage amount, seepage stability, deformation under seepage, Doupo Reservoir

中图分类号:

TV 641

罗长军，胡峰，张磊奇，王会午，. 陡坡水库大坝渗透稳定性及渗透变形分析[J]. , 2006, 27(8): 1305-1311.

LUO Chang-jun , HU Feng , ZHANG Lei-qi , WANG Hui-wu，. Analysis of seepage stability and deformation of dam for Doupo Reservoir[J]. , 2006, 27(8): 1305-1311.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	杨杰, 马春辉, 程琳, 吕高, 李斌, . 高陡边坡变形及其对坝体安全稳定影响研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2341-2353.
[2]	王克忠, 金志豪, 杨麦珍, 刘先亮, 刘华, . 取水塔基坑开挖过程倒悬岩坎围堰渗透稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 415-422.
[3]	袁涛，蒋中明，刘德谦，熊小虎，. 粗粒土渗透损伤特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1311-1316.
[4]	陈成, 詹良通, 徐文杰, 陈云敏, . 基于褶皱几何参数统计规律的渗漏量评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4588-4596.
[5]	陈成，詹良通，徐文杰，陈云敏, . 复合衬垫土工膜褶皱网络水力连通性分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3685-3694.
[6]	倪卫达，单治钢，刘晓,. 基于三维节理网络模拟的坝基岩体结构分类研究[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 287-296.
[7]	杨迎晓，龚晓南，周春平，金兴平,. 钱塘江冲海积粉土渗透破坏试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 243-249.
[8]	肖珍珍，王登银，陈建叶，杨宝全，张林，. 碾压混凝土高拱坝坝肩稳定及坝体开裂静动力分析[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3541-3547.
[9]	李美蓉，陈媛，张林，杨宝全 , . 复杂地质条件下多结构面对重力坝坝基稳定性的影响及处理[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 328-333.
[10]	张社荣，王超，孙博. Bayes约束随机场下坝基溶蚀区随机模拟方法及其影响分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2337-2346.
[11]	彭鹏，单治钢，王永明，贾海波，董育烦 . 基于饱和指数模型的坝基帷幕体防渗效果及耐久性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 221-226.
[12]	杨文东，张强勇，陈芳，李文纲　，王建洪　，贺如平　，曾纪全　. 基于承压板试验的岩体蠕变参数反演统一解析公式法[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 367-374.
[13]	张社荣，严磊，王超，孙博，撒文奇. 基于随机有限元法的溶蚀坝基系统建坝适应性评价[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 597-603.
[14]	常东升，张利民. 土体渗透稳定性判定准则[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 253-259.
[15]	宋彦辉，巨广宏，孙苗. 岩体波速与坝基岩体变形模量关系[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1507-1512.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed