顶管施工中管道受力性能的现场试验研究

›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 1273-1277.

顶管施工中管道受力性能的现场试验研究

魏纲¹，徐日庆¹，余剑英²，王众¹

1. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310027；2. 浙江大学城市学院工程分院土木系，杭州 310015

收稿日期:2004-02-11 出版日期:2005-08-10 发布日期:2013-12-26
作者简介:魏纲，男，1977年生，博士研究生，主要从事软土地基处理及非开挖技术研究

Site-based experimental study on pipe behavior during pipe jacking

WEI Gang¹, XU Ri-qing¹, YU Jian-ying², WANG Zhong¹

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310015, China

Received:2004-02-11 Online:2005-08-10 Published:2013-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对顶进过程中管道纵向与环向钢筋应力及管土接触压力进行了现场测试。实测数据分析表明，管节开始顶进时轴力随顶进距离增大而增大，顶进到一定距离后，基本维持在一定范围内。管顶和管底的内侧钢筋受拉，外侧钢筋受压；管节两侧的内侧钢筋受压，外侧受拉。钢筋混凝土管道可看作柔性管道。环向钢筋受力很小，但变动较大。管土接触压力随管道的顶进一开始缓慢上升，到一定距离后基本保持在一定范围内。注浆对管顶接触压力影响较大，注浆后压力明显减小，可取为上覆土重；对左右两侧接触压力影响较小。注浆前左右两侧跟管顶压力相差不大，注浆后则要明显大于管顶压力。

关键词: 顶管, 管道应力, 管土接触压力, 现场监测

Abstract: Vertical and annular reinforcing steel bar stress and pipe-soil contact pressure during pipe jacking were monitored on the spot. Field data were analyzed. It showed that axis force increased along with pipe jacking at the very start, and it maintained stated basically when jacking to a certain distance. When inner side reinforcing steel bar of tip and bottom pipe were pulled, outer side were pressed. And both sides of pipe were just contrary. Reinforced concrete pipe could be regarded as flexible pipe. Annular reinforcing steel bar bears very little but with great alteration. Pipe-soil contact pressure increased slowly along with pipe jacking, and it also maintained stated basically after some distance. Contact pressure of tip pipe was greatly affected by grouting. The pressure decreased obviously after grouting and it could be adopted as up-earth gravity. Contact pressures of both sides were affected less. Compared with the tip pipe, they were almost the same before grouting and noticeably bigger after grouting.

Key words: pipe jacking, pipe stress, pipe-soil contact pressure, site monitoring

中图分类号:

TU 473.2

魏纲，徐日庆，余剑英，王众，. 顶管施工中管道受力性能的现场试验研究[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1273-1277.

WEI Gang, XU Ri-qing, YU Jian-ying, WANG Zhong，. Site-based experimental study on pipe behavior during pipe jacking[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1273-1277.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	何海杰, 兰吉武, 高武, 陈云敏, 马鹏程, 肖电坤, . 压缩空气排水井在填埋场滑移控制中的应用及分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 343-350.
[2]	董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[3]	吴建涛, 叶霄, 李国维, 蒋超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[4]	陈晋龙，李锦辉，程鹏，宋磊，周腾. 植被作用下土质覆盖层渗透特性的现场试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 222-228.
[5]	许度，冯夏庭，李邵军，吴世勇，邱士利，周扬一，高要辉，. 基于三维激光扫描的锦屏地下实验室岩体变形破坏特征关键信息提取技术研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 488-495.
[6]	庄海洋，张艳书，薛栩超，徐烨,. 深软场地地铁狭长深基坑变形特征实测与已有统计结果的对比分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
[7]	沈建文，刘力,. 盾构隧道施工对临近桥桩影响数值及现场监测研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 709-714.
[8]	陈孝湘，张培勇，丁士君，唐自强,. 大口径三维曲线顶管顶力估算及实测分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 547-552.
[9]	沙鹏，伍法权，李响，梁宁，常金源，. 高地应力条件下层状地层隧道围岩挤压变形与支护受力特征[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1407-1414.
[10]	李雪，周顺华，宫全美，陈长江, . 大断面深埋高水压地铁盾构隧道周边土压力作用模式评价[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1415-1420.
[11]	张治国，张孟喜，王卫东,. 顶管推进引起施工场地竖向附加荷载分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 121-128.
[12]	徐鹏飞，李耀良，徐伟，. 压入式沉井施工对环境影响的现场监测研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1084-1094.
[13]	王双，夏才初，葛金科，. 考虑泥浆套不同形态的顶管管壁摩阻力计算公式[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 159-166.
[14]	景路，袁聚云，袁勇 . 顶管工程中的地层损失参数和土体变形计算[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 173-178.
[15]	杨仙，张可能，黎永索，彭环云，黄常波 . 深埋顶管顶力理论计算与实测分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 757-761.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed