填土压实质量检测及机载压实集成系统分析

›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 605-608.

填土压实质量检测及机载压实集成系统分析

范云，汪英珍

烟台大学土木工程系，山东烟台 264005

收稿日期:2003-01-10 出版日期:2004-04-10 发布日期:2014-07-17
作者简介:范云，男，1954年生，教授，主要从事道路与铁道工程专业方向的教学及研究。
基金资助:
国家重大技术装备研制项目（科技攻关）计划资助项目（合同号：ZZ01-14-04-03）

Checking of quality of earth-fill compaction and analysis for compaction machine assembling system

FAN Yun, WANG Ying-zhen

Department of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China

Received:2003-01-10 Online:2004-04-10 Published:2014-07-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对既有及正在开发中的填土压实检测技术的原理及实测方法进行了系统的介绍、分析及论证。在此基础上，阐述了开发填土压实检测与压实机械集成系统的必要性、研制机载集成系统时所依据的力学模型、实现途径及国内外关于压实机械集成系统研究、开发的最新进展，介绍了压实机械集成系统的工作原理及工作特性，同时指出了为适应当前及未来土建工程对填土压实质量（特别是沉降量及沉降速率等方面）的基本要求，应以填土压实层的力学强度（K30、动刚度系数等）作为开发压实机械集成系统时的参考对比指标。

关键词: 压实系数, K30, 动刚度系数, 信号传感器, 压实层, 压实机械集成系统

Abstract: This paper introduces, analyses and appraises the principle and operating rule of newly and existing earth—filled compaction checking technology. Based on making penetrating analysis, this paper expounds the necessity, mechanical model, the accomplishing ways and newly international preparing advance of developing compaction machine assembling system. The basic principle and working properties of compaction machine assembling system are also described; and that for satisfying basic needs of earth-fill compaction quality in civil engineering (such as quantity of settlement, rate of settlement and so on) the mechanical intensity (such as K30, dynamic rigidity coefficient and so on) should be taken for standard of reference in preparing compaction machine assembling system.

Key words: compaction coefficient, K30, dynamic rigidity coefficient, signal sensor, compaction layer, compaction machine assembling system

中图分类号:

U 416.06

范云，汪英珍. 填土压实质量检测及机载压实集成系统分析[J]. , 2004, 25(4): 605-608.

FAN Yun, WANG Ying-zhen . Checking of quality of earth-fill compaction and analysis for compaction machine assembling system[J]. , 2004, 25(4): 605-608.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	谢兴华，王国庆. 深厚覆盖层坝基防渗墙深度研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2708 -2712 .
[2]	宋晶，王清，孙铁，李晓茹，张中琼，焦志亮. 吹填土自重沉淤阶段孔隙水压力消散的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2935 -2940 .
[3]	李廷，徐振华，罗俊. 基桩声波透射法检测数据评判体系研究[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3165 -3172 .
[4]	夏力农，雷鸣，聂重军. 桩顶荷载对负摩阻力性状影响的现场试验[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 664 -668 .
[5]	叶为民，黄伟，陈宝，郁陈，王驹. 双电层理论与高庙子膨润土的体变特征[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 1899 -1903 .
[6]	胡云世，苏辉，成怡冲，艾智勇. 层状可压缩岩基三维固结问题的状态空间解[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 176 -180 .
[7]	郑杰文，贾永刚，刘晓磊，单红仙，杨忠年. 黄河三角洲沉积物抗侵蚀性动态变化差异研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 290 -0296 .
[8]	张红，郑颖人，杨臻，王谦源，葛苏鸣. 黄土隧洞支护结构设计方法探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 473 -478 .
[9]	戚炜，王勇智，姜伏伟. 黄河某高拱坝岩体力学参数的选取[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 478 -483 .
[10]	陈建功，周陶陶，张永兴. 深部洞室围岩分区破裂化的冲击破坏机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2629 -2634 .